The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Infectious diseases, reproductive effort and the cost of reproduction in birds
Abstract
Reproductive effort can have profound effects on subsequent performance. Field experiments on the collared flycatcher (Ficedula albicollis) have demonstrated a number of trade-offs between life-history traits at different ages. The mechanism by which reproductive effort is mediated into future reproductive performance remains obscure. Anti-parasite adaptations such as cell-mediated immunity may probably also be costly. Hence the possibility exists of a trade-off between reproductive effort and the ability to resist parasitic infection. Serological tests on unmanipulated collared flycatchers show that pre-breeding nutritional status correlates positively with reproductive success and negatively with susceptibility to parasitism (viruses, bacteria and protozoan parasites). Both immune response and several indicators of infectious disease correlate negatively with reproductive success. Similar relations are found between secondary sexual characters and infection parameters. For brood-size-manipulated birds there was a significant interaction between experimentally increased reproductive effort and parasitic infection rate with regard to both current and future fecundity. It seems possible that the interaction between parasitic infection, nutrition and reproductive effort can be an important mechanism in the ultimate shaping of life-history variation in avian populations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The genetical theory of natural selection
Fisher, R. A. (1930) · doi:10.5962/bhl.title.27468 · Cited by 17,617
Pleiotropy, natural selection, and the evolution of senescence
Williams, G. C. (1957) · Evolution · doi:10.2307/2406060 · Cited by 1,912
Cited by
The physiology of life history trade-offs in animals
Zera, A. J., & Harshman, L. G. (2001) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.32.081501.114006 · Cited by 1,577
Variation in immune defence as a question of evolutionary ecology
Schmid-Hempel, P. (2003) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2002.2265 · Cited by 722
Hanssen, S. A., Hasselquist, D., Folstad, I., & Erikstad, K. E. (2005) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2005.3057 · Cited by 339
Hormones and Mating System Affect Sex and Species Differences in Immune Function among Vertebrates
Klein, S. L. (2000) · Behavioural Processes · doi:10.1016/s0376-6357(00)00125-x · Cited by 209
BOHEC, C. L., GAUTHIER‐CLERC, M., GRÉMILLET, D., PRADEL, R., BÉCHET, A., GENDNER, J., & MAHO, Y. L. (2007) · Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2656.2007.01268.x · Cited by 79
Metadata
- Authors
- Gustafsson, L., Nordling, D., Andersson, M. S., Sheldon, B. C., & Qvarnström, A.
- Venue
- Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 1994-11-29
- Volume
- 346
- Issue
- 1317
- Pages
- 323-331
- ISSN
- 0962-8436 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-2970
- OpenAlex
- W4248428238
- Cited by
- 321
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 9.49
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Infectious diseases, reproductive effort and the cost of reproduction in birds. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rstb.1994.0149
- The paper
- Gustafsson, L., Nordling, D., Andersson, M. S., Sheldon, B. C., & Qvarnström, A. (1994). Infectious diseases, reproductive effort and the cost of reproduction in birds. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1994.0149
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.