Cited by 209Animal Behavior and ReproductionEvolutionary Psychology and Human BehaviorAnimal Vocal Communication and Behavior

Hormones and Mating System Affect Sex and Species Differences in Immune Function among Vertebrates

Klein, Sabra L·2000·Behavioural Processes

Abstract

Males generally exhibit reduced immune responses as well as increased intensity and prevalence of infections compared to female conspecifics. Physiologically, these sex differences may reflect the immunosuppressive effects of androgens. In addition to suppressing immune function, androgens maintain several characteristics important for reproductive success. Thus, a dynamic relationship is assumed to exist among hormones, secondary sex traits, and the immune system. Ultimately, the extent to which this relationship exists may be related to the mating system. Because polygynous males generally have higher circulating testosterone concentrations and rely more heavily on testosterone-dependent traits for reproductive success than monogamous males, sex differences in immune function are hypothesised to be more pronounced among polygynous as compared to monogamous species. Additionally, if secondary sex traits are used to advertise infection status, then females should be able to use the condition of male secondary sex traits to discern the immune/infection status of males during mate selection. The purpose of this review is to survey current studies that examine both the proximate mechanisms and ultimate function of variation in immune function and susceptibility to infection and determine whether immunological variation influences mate preference and possibly reproductive success.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0376-6357(00)00125-x

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Females typically display stronger immune responses and reduced pathogen load compared to males.

    “Whilst other studies looking at sex differences and immunity suggest that females typically display stronger immune responses and reduced pathogen load compared to males (Klein 2000), greater sociality in females (Macdonald 1979, 1983) may increase viral transmission opportunities.”

    From Red fox viromes in urban and rural landscapes (2020) · cites this paper as Klein 2000

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Klein, S. L.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Klein, Sabra L
Venue
Behavioural Processes
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-10
Volume
51
Issue
1-3
Pages
149-166
ISSN
0376-6357 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2082091413
Cited by
209
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 5
FWCI
7.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Behavioural Processes (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Johns Hopkins University
  • National Institute of Mental Health
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology › Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
Keywords
mating systems, androgens, testosterone, polygyny, monogamy, infection susceptibility, mate choice, immunosuppression, reproductive success, vertebrates

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review