The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A supra-ordinal classification of the Brachiopoda
Abstract
A new classification of the Brachiopoda is proposed to take into account recent advances in our understanding of the anatomy, shell morphology, ontogeny and phylogeny of the phylum. The use of phylogenetic analysis to help rationalize this new information did not obviate the dilemma facing all previous classifications of how best to reconcile fossil and living data. Over 95% of all recognized genera are founded on extinct species, with the greatest diversity occurring in Cambro-Ordovician times when all but two of the 26 major groups constituting the phylum first appeared. Only five of these groups survive to the present day, albeit as well dispersed representatives of the early diversity. To com pare phylogenies extrapolated from these data, phylogenetic analyses of Recent and Cambro-Ordovician groups were conducted independently by using 55 biological characters for the former group and 69 morphological (and inferred anatomical) features for the latter; only 12 characters were common to both exercises. The cladogram derived for seven Recent suprafamilial taxa, with Phoronis and cyclostome and ctenostome bryozoans as outgroups, is virtually the same as that being obtained by studies of the brachiopod genome. It is also largely compatible with the cladogram for 33 Cambro-Ordovician suprafamilial taxa with Phoronis as outgroup. This cladogram has, in turn, been subjected to stratocladistic tests and has been shown to be consistent with the stratigraphic records of the taxa analysed. A reconciliation of the genealogies derived from the Recent and Cambro-Ordovician data, represented by 14 taxa and clades (with Phoronis as outgroup), was effected by using the 19 synapomorphies characterizing these groups. The resultant cladogram shows living organophosphatic-shelled lingulids (and discinids) as a sister group to a clade of all other living brachiopods. This clade, however, includes the extinct organophosphatic-shelled paterinids and the organocalcitic-shelled craniids. The inclusion of the craniids, in particular, is a cladistic compromise that is inconsistent with genetic and some anatomical and morphological evidence. It was therefore decided to accommodate these inconsistencies by dividing the Brachiopoda into three subphyla, each typified by Recent species with early Palaeozoic ancestors and defined by easily identifiable synapomorphies. The inarticulated Linguliformea, consisting of two classes (Lingulata and Paterinata), is characterized by an organophosphatic shell with a stratiform secondary layer and by planktotrophic larvae. Its modern representatives are the lingulids and discinids. The inarticulated Craniiformea is primarily distinguished by an organocarbonate shell with a laminar secondary layer and the absence of a pedicle throughout ontogeny. The craniids are the sole Recent descendants. The mainly articulated Rhynchonelliformea is the largest subphylum as it embraces five Classes (Chileata, Obolellata, Kutorginata, Strophomenata and Rhynchonellata). Its synapomorphies include an organocarbonate shell with a fibrous secondary layer, the presence of a pedicle without a coelomic core and the development of a recognizable diductor muscle system controlling the opening of the valves about a hinge axis defined by interareas. All Recent brachiopod species articulating with cyrtomatodont teeth and sockets are rhynchonelliforms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
MacClade 4.0: analysis of phylogeny and character evolution
(2001) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.39-2183 · Cited by 5,554
Treatise on Invertebrate Paleontology
Moore, R. C. (1950) · The Micropaleontologist · doi:10.2307/1483846 · Cited by 3,623
Animal evolution: interrelationships of the living phyla
(2012) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.50-1469 · Cited by 1,039
Molecular Phylogeny of the Animal Kingdom
Field, K. G., Olsen, G. J., Lane, D. J., Giovannoni, S. J., Ghiselin, M. T., Raff, E. C., Pace, N. R., & Raff, R. A. (1988) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.3277277 · Cited by 750
(1940) · Andalas University Repository (Andalas University) · Cited by 591
Evidence from 18 S Ribosomal DNA that the Lophophorates Are Protostome Animals
Halanych, K. M., Bacheller, J. D., Aguinaldo, A. M. A., Liva, S. M., Hillis, D. M., & Lake, J. A. (1995) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7886451 · Cited by 579
Phylogeny as a Central Principle in Taxonomy: Phylogenetic Definitions of Taxon Names
de Queiroz, K., & Gauthier, J. (1990) · Systematic Zoology · doi:10.2307/2992353 · Cited by 573
Gingerich, P. D., Patterson, C., & Rosen, D. E. (1977) · Systematic Zoology · doi:10.2307/2412685 · Cited by 506
Systematics and the Fossil Record: documenting evolutionary patterns
Smith, A. B. (1994) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781444313918 · Cited by 456
The fossil record and the early evolution of the Metazoa
Morris, S. C. (1993) · Nature · doi:10.1038/361219a0 · Cited by 389
Cited by
Peterson, K. J., & Eernisse, D. J. (2001) · Evolution & Development · doi:10.1046/j.1525-142x.2001.003003170.x · Cited by 529
Phylogeny of the Metazoa Based on Morphological and 18S Ribosomal DNA Evidence
Zrzavý, J. (1998) · Cladistics · doi:10.1006/clad.1998.0070 · Cited by 438
The ‘biomineralization toolkit’ and the origin of animal skeletons
Murdock, D. J. E. (2020) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/brv.12614 · Cited by 177
Origin and evolution of animal life cycles
NIELSEN, C. (1998) · Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · doi:10.1017/s0006323197005136 · Cited by 158
Homologous skeletal secretion in tommotiids and brachiopods
Balthasar, U., Skovsted, C. B., Holmer, L. E., & Brock, G. A. (2009) · Geology · doi:10.1130/g30323a.1 · Cited by 60
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Williams, A., Carlson, S. J., Brunton, C. H. C., Holmer, L. E., & Popov, L.
- Venue
- Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 1996-09-30
- Volume
- 351
- Issue
- 1344
- Pages
- 1171-1193
- ISSN
- 0962-8436 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-2970
- OpenAlex
- W2108438564
- Cited by
- 477
- References
- 37
- FWCI
- 10.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A supra-ordinal classification of the Brachiopoda. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rstb.1996.0101
- The paper
- Williams, A., Carlson, S. J., Brunton, C. H. C., Holmer, L. E., & Popov, L. (1996). A supra-ordinal classification of the Brachiopoda. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1996.0101
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.