Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 522

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Adaptive individual differences within single populations

Open access
Wilson, David Sloan·1998·Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences

Abstract

Phenotypic differences can exist between species, between local populations of the same species and between individuals within single local populations. At all scales, phenotypic differences can be either adaptive or non–adaptive. Using natural selection to explain differences between closely related species was controversial during the 1940s but had become common by the 1960s. Similarly, the adaptive nature of differences between local populations was initially controversial but had become widely accepted by the 1980s. The interpretation of differences at the finest scale—between individuals within single populations—is still unresolved. This paper reviews studies of adaptive individual differences in resource use and response to risk. A general conceptual framework for thinking about adaptive individual differences within populations can unite subjects as seemingly different as speciation and personality psychology.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rstb.1998.0202

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. Clark A. B. & Ehlinger T. J. 1987 Pattern and adaptation in individual behavioral di¡erences. In Perspectives in ethology (ed. P. P. G. Bateson & P. H. Klopfer) pp. 1^47. New York: Plenum. · DOI
  2. Coleman K. & Wilson D. S. 1998 Individual di¡erences are context speci¢c in pumpkinseed sun¢sh. Anim. Behav. (In the press.)
  3. Dobzhansky T. 1970 Genetics of the evolutionary process. New York: Columbia University Press.
  4. Ehlinger T. J. & Wilson D. S. 1988 Complex foraging polymorphism in bluegill sun¢sh. Proc. Natn. Acad. Sci. USA 85 1878^1882. · DOI
  5. Endler J. A. 1986 Natural selection in the wild. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.
  6. Gilbert L. E. 1983 Coevolution and mimicry. In Coevolution (ed. D. J. Futuyma & M. Slatkin) pp. 263^281. Sunderland MA: Sinauer Associates.
  7. Greenwood P. H. 1984 African cichlids and evolutionary theories. In Evolution of ¢sh species £ocks (ed. A. A. Echelle & I. Korn¢eld) pp. 141^154. Orono ME: University of Maine Press.
  8. 10.1111/j.1095-8649.1997.tb01539.x · DOI
  9. Krause J. & Godin J.-G. J. 1996 In£uence of prey foraging posture on £ight behavior and predation risk: predators take advantage of unwary prey. Behav. Ecol. 7 264^271. · DOI
  10. Lack D. 1961 Darwin's ¢nches. Cambridge University Press.
  11. 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1995.tb00505.x · DOI · Paper page
  12. Paterson H. E. H., 1978, More evidence against speciation by reinforcement, S. Afr. J. Sci., 74
  13. Paterson H. E. H. 1980 A comment on `mate recognition systems'. Evolution 34 330^331. · DOI
  14. Robinson B. W. & Wilson D. S. 1994 Character displacement and release in ¢sh: a neglected literature. Am. Nat. 144 596^627. · DOI
  15. 10.1007/BF01237711 · DOI
  16. Robinson B. W. Wilson D. S. & Shea G. O. 1996 Trade-o¡s of ecological specialization in pumpkinseed sun¢sh. Ecology 77 170^178. · DOI
  17. Shuster S. M. & Wade M. J. 1991 Equal mating success among male reproductive strategies in a marine isopod. Nature 350 608^610. · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.27.1.111 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Smith T. B. Wayne R. K. Girman D. J. & Bruford M. S. 1997 A role for ecotones in generating rainforest diversity. Science 276 1855^1857. · DOI
  20. Stephens D. W. & Krebs J. R. 1986 Foraging theory. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.
  21. Wilson D. S. 1989 The diversi¢cation of single gene pools by density- and frequency-dependent selection. In Speciation and its consequences (ed. D. Otte & J. A. Endler) pp. 366^386. Sunderland MA: Sinauer Associates.
  22. Wilson D. S., 1982, Speciation and the economics of mate choice, Evol.Theory, 6, 24
  23. Wilson D. S. & Turelli M. 1986 Stable underdominance and the evolutionary invasion of empty niches. Am. Nat. 127 835^850. · DOI
  24. 10.1037/0735-7036.107.3.250 · DOI
  25. Wilson D. S. Clark A. B. Coleman K. & Dearstyne T. 1994 Shyness and boldness in humans and other animals.Trends Ecol. Evol. 9 442^446. · DOI
  26. Wilson D. S. Muzzall P. M. & Ehlinger T. J. 1996 Parasites morphology and habitat use in a bluegill sun¢sh (Lepomis macrochirus) population. Copeia 1996 348^354. · DOI

Cited by

See all 522

Metadata

Authors
Wilson, D. S.
Venue
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences
Published
1998-02-28
Volume
353
Issue
1366
Pages
199-205
ISSN
  • 0962-8436 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-2970
OpenAlex
W2065093701
Cited by
522
References
1
FWCI
5.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green
Licence
royalsociety.org/journals/ethics-policies/data-sharing-mining/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Adaptive individual differences within single populations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rstb.1998.0202
The paper
Wilson, D. S. (1998). Adaptive individual differences within single populations. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1998.0202

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.