Cited by 67Evolution and Paleontology StudiesGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesPaleontology and Evolutionary Biology

The platypus is not a rodent: DNA hybridization, amniote phylogeny and the palimpsest theory

Open access
Kirsch, John A. W., Mayer, Gregory C.·1998·Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences

Abstract

We present DNA–hybridization data on 21 amniotes and two anurans showing that discrimination is obtained among most of these at the class and lower levels. Trees generated from these data largely agree with conventional views, for example in not associating birds and mammals. However, the sister relationships found here of the monotremes to marsupials, and of turtles to the alligator, are surprising results which are nonetheless consistent with the results of some other studies. The Marsupionta hypothesis of Gregory is reviewed, as are opinions about the placement of chelonians. Anatomical and reproductive data considered by Gregory do not unequivocally preclude a marsupial–monotreme special relationship, and there is other recent evidence for placing turtles within the Diapsida. We conclude that the evidential meaning of the molecular data is as shown in the trees, but that the topologies may be influenced by a base–compositional bias producing a seemingly slow evolutionary rate in monotremes, or by algorithmic artefacts (in the case of turtles as well).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rstb.1998.0278

Cites

123 of 123 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This divergence estimate is similar to previous estimates but seems at odds with fossil evidence, perhaps owing to relatively recent reductions of mutational rates in the monotreme lineage.

    “Although similar to previous estimates 32 , this value seems to be at odds with fossil evidence, perhaps owing to relatively recent reductions of mutational rates in the monotreme lineage 33 .”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 124 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kirsch, J. A. W., & Mayer, G. C.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin System (US)
Corresponding author
Kirsch, John A. W.
Venue
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences
Published
1998-07-29
Volume
353
Issue
1372
Pages
1221-1237
ISSN
  • 0962-8436 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-2970
OpenAlex
W2163609591
Cited by
67
References
124
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
7.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Evolution and Paleontology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology
Keywords
platypus, monotremes, amniote phylogeny, DNA hybridization, turtles, Diapsida, base composition bias, molecular phylogenetic tree
MeSH terms
Animals, DNA, Marsupialia, Models, Theoretical, Nucleic Acid Hybridization, Phylogeny, Platypus, Rodentia, Evolution, Molecular

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review