Cited by 11Evolutionary Game Theory and CooperationExperimental Behavioral Economics StudiesGame Theory and Applications

Signalling boosts the evolution of cooperation in repeated group interactions

Open access
Martinez-Vaquero, Luis A., Santos, Francisco C., Trianni, Vito·2020·Journal of The Royal Society Interface

Abstract

Many biological and social systems show significant levels of collective action. Several cooperation mechanisms have been proposed, yet they have been mostly studied independently. Among these, direct reciprocity supports cooperation on the basis of repeated interactions among individuals. Signals and quorum dynamics may also drive cooperation. Here, we resort to an evolutionary game-theoretical model to jointly analyse these two mechanisms and study the conditions in which evolution selects for direct reciprocity, signalling, or their combination. We show that signalling alone leads to higher levels of cooperation than when combined with reciprocity, while offering additional robustness against errors. Specifically, successful strategies in the realm of direct reciprocity are often not selected in the presence of signalling, and memory of past interactions is only exploited opportunistically in the case of earlier coordination failure. Differently, signalling always evolves, even when costly. In the light of these results, it may be easier to understand why direct reciprocity has been observed only in a limited number of cases among non-humans, whereas signalling is widespread at all levels of complexity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rsif.2020.0635

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Skyrms B. 2010 Signals: evolution, learning, and information. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  2. Wilson EO. 1975 Sociobiology: the new synthesis. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
  3. Maynard Smith J, Szathmary E. 1995 The major transitions in evolution. Oxford, UK: Freeman.
  4. Maynard Smith J, Harper D. 2003 Animal signals. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  5. Dunbar R. 1998 Grooming, gossip, and the evolution of language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  6. Hauser M, McAuliffe K, Blake PR. 2009 Evolving the ingredients for reciprocity and spite. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 364, 3255-3266. (doi:10.1098/rstb. 2009.0116) · DOI
  7. Whitlock M, Davis B, Yeaman S. 2007 The costs and benefits of resource sharing: reciprocity requires resource heterogeneity. J. Evol. Biol. 20, 1772-1782. (doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2007.01387.x) · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Martinez-Vaquero, L. A., Santos, F. C., & Trianni, V.
Affiliations
  • National Research Council (IT)
  • Instituto de Engenharia de Sistemas e Computadores Investigação e Desenvolvimento (PT)
Venue
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
Published
2020-11
Volume
17
Issue
172
Pages
20200635
ISSN
  • 1742-5662 (ISSN-L)
  • 1742-5689
OpenAlex
W3095652294
Cited by
11
References
60
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3
FWCI
2.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of The Royal Society Interface (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • European Research Consortium for Informatics and Mathematics (Alain Bensoussan Fellowship)
  • Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (PTDC/EEI-SII/5081/2014, PTDC/MAT/STA/3358/2014, UIDB/50021/2020)
  • H2020 LEIT Information and Communication Technologies (952215)
  • FP7 People: Marie-Curie Actions (631297)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Game Theory and Applications
Keywords
evolution of cooperation, direct reciprocity, signaling, costly signaling, error resilience, collective action, evolutionary game theory
MeSH terms
Cooperative Behavior, Biological Evolution, Game Theory, Memory, Models, Theoretical

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review