The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Fruits, foliage and the evolution of primate colour vision
Open accessAbstract
Primates are apparently unique amongst the mammals in possessing trichromatic colour vision. However, not all primates are trichromatic. Amongst the haplorhine (higher) primates, the catarrhines possess uniformly trichromatic colour vision, whereas most of the platyrrhine species exhibit polymorphic colour vision, with a variety of dichromatic and trichromatic phenotypes within the population. It has been suggested that trichromacy in primates and the reflectance functions of certain tropical fruits are aspects of a coevolved seed–dispersal system: primate colour vision has been shaped by the need to find coloured fruits amongst foliage, and the fruits themselves have evolved to be salient to primates and so secure dissemination of their seeds. We review the evidence for and against this hypothesis and we report an empirical test: we show that the spectral positioning of the cone pigments found in trichromatic South American primates is well matched to the task of detecting fruits against a background of leaves. We further report that particular trichromatic platyrrhine phenotypes may be better suited than others to foraging for particular fruits under particular conditions of illumination; and we discuss possible explanations for the maintenance of polymorphic colour vision amongst the platyrrhines.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A review of the evolution of animal colour vision and visual communication signals
Osorio, D., & Vorobyev, M. (2008) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/j.visres.2008.06.018 · Cited by 401
The genetics of normal and defective color vision
Neitz, J., & Neitz, M. (2011) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/j.visres.2010.12.002 · Cited by 377
Evolution of colour vision in mammals
Jacobs, G. H. (2009) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2009.0039 · Cited by 356
Seeing, Doing, and Knowing: A Philosophical Theory of Sense Perception
Matthen, M. (2005) · doi:10.1093/0199268509.001.0001 · Cited by 333
Evolution and spectral tuning of visual pigments in birds and mammals
Hunt, D. M., Carvalho, L. S., Cowing, J. A., & Davies, W. L. (2009) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2009.0044 · Cited by 234
Allocating structure to function: the strong links between neuroplasticity and natural selection
Anderson, M. L., & Finlay, B. L. (2014) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00918 · Cited by 115
“…from reflectance (Kingdom, 2003), social communication involving detection of blood oxygenation, (Changizi et al., 2006), foraging for fruits (Regan et al., 2001), or distinction of leaf age for folivory (Lucas et al., 1997) have all been offered; clearly it is likely that trichromacy…”
BackgroundBayesian natural selection and the evolution of perceptual systems
Geisler, W. S., & Diehl, R. L. (2002) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2001.1055 · Cited by 101
Coding of the contrasts in natural images by populations of neurons in primary visual cortex (V1)
Clatworthy, P. L., Chirimuuta, M., Lauritzen, J. S., & Tolhurst, D. J. (2003) · Vision Research · doi:10.1016/s0042-6989(03)00277-3 · Cited by 54
ROWE, M. P., & JACOBS, G. H. (2007) · Visual Neuroscience · doi:10.1017/s0952523807230159 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Regan, B. C., Julliot, C., Simmen, B., Viénot, F., Charles–Dominique, P., & Mollon, J. D.
- Venue
- Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 2001-03-29
- Volume
- 356
- Issue
- 1407
- Pages
- 229-283
- ISSN
- 0962-8436 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-2970
- OpenAlex
- W2149414844
- Cited by
- 578
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 45.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.