The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Advanced database methodology for the Collation of Connectivity data on the Macaque brain (CoCoMac)
Open accessAbstract
The need to integrate massively increasing amounts of data on the mammalian brain has driven several ambitious neuroscientific database projects that were started during the last decade. Databasing the brain's anatomical connectivity as delivered by tracing studies is of particular importance as these data characterize fundamental structural constraints of the complex and poorly understood functional interactions between the components of real neural systems. Previous connectivity databases have been crucial for analysing anatomical brain circuitry in various species and have opened exciting new ways to interpret functional data, both from electrophysiological and from functional imaging studies. The eventual impact and success of connectivity databases, however, will require the resolution of several methodological problems that currently limit their use. These problems comprise four main points: (i) objective representation of coordinate–free, parcellation–based data, (ii) assessment of the reliability and precision of individual data, especially in the presence of contradictory reports, (iii) data mining and integration of large sets of partially redundant and contradictory data, and (iv) automatic and reproducible transformation of data between incongruent brain maps. Here, we present the specific implementation of the ‘collation of connectivity data on the macaque brain’ (CoCoMac) database (http://www.cocomac.org). The design of this database addresses the methodological challenges listed above, and focuses on experimental and computational neuroscientists' needs to flexibly analyse and process the large amount of published experimental data from tracing studies. In this article, we explain step–by–step the conceptual rationale and methodology of CoCoMac and demonstrate its practical use by an analysis of connectivity in the prefrontal cortex.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Distributed hierarchical processing in the primate cerebral cortex
Felleman, D. J., & Van Essen, D. C. (1991) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/1.1.1 · Cited by 7,783
A relational model of data for large shared data banks
Codd, E. F. (1970) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/362384.362685 · Cited by 5,547
The anatomical basis of functional localization in the cortex
Passingham, R. E., Stephan, K. E., & Kötter, R. (2002) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn893 · Cited by 1,024
Self-citationCingulate cortex of the rhesus monkey: II. Cortical afferents
Vogt, B. A., & Pandya, D. N. (1987) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.902620208 · Cited by 854
Architectonic subdivision of the orbital and medial prefrontal cortex in the macaque monkey
Carmichael, S. T., & Price, J. L. (1994) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.903460305 · Cited by 656 · cited 3×
“For example, Carmichael & Price (1994), Matelli et al. (1991) and Vogt et al. (1987) each describe an area 24c.”
BackgroundMethodCingulate cortex of the rhesus monkey: I. Cytoarchitecture and thalamic afferents
Vogt, B. A., Pandya, D. N., & Rosene, D. L. (1987) · Journal of Comparative Neurology · doi:10.1002/cne.902620207 · Cited by 604
Hilgetag, C., O'Neill, M. A., & Young, M. P. (2000) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2000.0550 · Cited by 167
Self-citation
Cited by
Complex networks: structure and dynamics
BOCCALETTI, S., LATORA, V, MORENO, Y., CHAVEZ, M., & HWANG, D. (2006) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2005.10.009 · Cited by 11,010
The Human Connectome: A Structural Description of the Human Brain
Sporns, O., Tononi, G., & Kötter, R. (2005) · PLoS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.0010042 · Cited by 3,260
Self-citationSituating the default-mode network along a principal gradient of macroscale cortical organization
Margulies, D. S., Ghosh, S. S., Goulas, A., Falkiewicz, M., Huntenburg, J. M., Langs, G., Bezgin, G., Eickhoff, S. B., Castellanos, F. X., Petrides, M., et al. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1608282113 · Cited by 2,321
Bassett, D. S., & Sporns, O. (2017) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.4502 · Cited by 2,398
Large-scale brain networks in cognition: emerging methods and principles
Bressler, S. L., & Menon, V. (2010) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2010.04.004 · Cited by 2,348
Metadata
- Authors
- Stephan, K. E., Kamper, L., Bozkurt, A., Burns, G. A. P. C., Young, M. P., & Kötter, R.
- Venue
- Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 2001-08-29
- Volume
- 356
- Issue
- 1412
- Pages
- 1159-1186
- ISSN
- 0962-8436 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-2970
- OpenAlex
- W2145687948
- Cited by
- 368
- References
- 7
- FWCI
- 5.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Advanced database methodology for the Collation of Connectivity data on the Macaque brain (CoCoMac). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rstb.2001.0908
- The paper
- Stephan, K. E., Kamper, L., Bozkurt, A., Burns, G. A. P. C., Young, M. P., & Kötter, R. (2001). Advanced database methodology for the Collation of Connectivity data on the Macaque brain (CoCoMac). Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2001.0908
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.