The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Public information for the assessment of quality: a widespread social phenomenon
Open accessAbstract
We propose that the use of public information about the quality of environmental resources, obtained by monitoring the sampling behaviour of others, may be a widespread social phenomenon allowing individuals to make faster, more accurate assessments of their environment. To demonstrate this (i) we define public information and distinguish it from other kinds of social information; (ii) we review empirical work demonstrating the benefits and costs of using public information to estimate food patch quality; (iii) we examine recent work showing that individuals may also be using public information to improve their estimates of the quality of such disparate environmental parameters as breeding patches, opponents and mates; and finally (iv) we suggest avenues of future work to better understand the nature of public information use and when it might be used or ignored. Such work should lead to a more complete understanding of the behaviour of individuals in social aggregations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Optimal foraging, the marginal value theorem
Charnov, E. L. (1976) · Theoretical Population Biology · doi:10.1016/0040-5809(76)90040-x · Cited by 5,374
Cited by
Consensus decision making in animals
Conradt, L., & Roper, T. J. (2005) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2005.05.008 · Cited by 872
How is female mate choice affected by male competition?
Wong, B. B. M., & Candolin, U. (2005) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1017/s1464793105006809 · Cited by 455
The influence of relationships on neophobia and exploration in wolves and dogs
Moretti, L., Hentrup, M., Kotrschal, K., & Range, F. (2015) · Animal Behaviour · doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2015.06.008 · Cited by 130
Vicarious reinforcement in rhesus macaques (Macaca Mulatta)
Chang, S. W. C., Winecoff, A. A., & Platt, M. L. (2011) · Frontiers in Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnins.2011.00027 · Cited by 124
“Such vicarious reinforcement may be driven by an intrinsic tendency to observe the experience of others to gather information, as can occur in foraging (Cheney and Seyfarth, 1990; Valone and Templeton, 2002).”
BackgroundInadvertent social information and the avoidance of parasitized male mice: A role for oxytocin
Kavaliers, M., Choleris, E., Ågmo, A., Braun, W. J., Colwell, D. D., Muglia, L. J., Ogawa, S., & Pfaff, D. W. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0600410103 · Cited by 87
Metadata
- Authors
- Valone, T. J., & Templeton, J. J.
- Venue
- Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 2002-11-29
- Volume
- 357
- Issue
- 1427
- Pages
- 1549-1557
- ISSN
- 0962-8436 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-2970
- OpenAlex
- W2095111769
- Cited by
- 419
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Public information for the assessment of quality: a widespread social phenomenon. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rstb.2002.1064
- The paper
- Valone, T. J., & Templeton, J. J. (2002). Public information for the assessment of quality: a widespread social phenomenon. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2002.1064
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.