Cited by 124Primate Behavior and EcologyChild and Animal Learning DevelopmentNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Vicarious reinforcement in rhesus macaques (Macaca Mulatta)

Open access
Chang, Steve W. C., Winecoff, Amy A., Platt, Michael L.·2011·Frontiers in Neuroscience

Abstract

What happens to others profoundly influences our own behavior. Such other-regarding outcomes can drive observational learning, as well as motivate cooperation, charity, empathy, and even spite. Vicarious reinforcement may serve as one of the critical mechanisms mediating the influence of other-regarding outcomes on behavior and decision-making in groups. Here we show that rhesus macaques spontaneously derive vicarious reinforcement from observing rewards given to another monkey, and that this reinforcement can motivate them to subsequently deliver or withhold rewards from the other animal. We exploited Pavlovian and instrumental conditioning to associate rewards to self (M1) and/or rewards to another monkey (M2) with visual cues. M1s made more errors in the instrumental trials when cues predicted reward to M2 compared to when cues predicted reward to M1, but made even more errors when cues predicted reward to no one. In subsequent preference tests between pairs of conditioned cues, M1s preferred cues paired with reward to M2 over cues paired with reward to no one. By contrast, M1s preferred cues paired with reward to self over cues paired with reward to both monkeys simultaneously. Rates of attention to M2 strongly predicted the strength and valence of vicarious reinforcement. These patterns of behavior, which were absent in non-social control trials, are consistent with vicarious reinforcement based upon sensitivity to observed, or counterfactual, outcomes with respect to another individual. Vicarious reward may play a critical role in shaping cooperation and competition, as well as motivating observational learning and group coordination in rhesus macaques, much as it does in humans. We propose that vicarious reinforcement signals mediate these behaviors via homologous neural circuits involved in reinforcement learning and decision-making.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fnins.2011.00027

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Rhesus macaques display basic aspects of complex social behaviors typically considered uniquely human, including social imitation, prosocial behaviors, and understanding others' perceptions.

    “Critically, rhesus macaques display basic aspects of complex social behaviors that are typically considered ‘uniquely human’ (Frith and Frith, 2007; Saxe, 2006). These include social imitation (Ferrari et al., 2006; Subiaul, 2004), prosocial behaviors (Chang et al., 2011; Masserman et al., 1964), as well as understanding others’ perceptions (Flombaum and Santos, 2005; Santos et al., 2006).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Sutton R. S. Barto A. G. (1998). Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction. London: MIT Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chang, S. W. C., Winecoff, A. A., & Platt, M. L.
Affiliations
Duke University (US)
Corresponding author
Chang, Steve W. C.
Venue
Frontiers in Neuroscience
Published
2011
Volume
5
Pages
27-27
ISSN
  • 1662-453X (ISSN-L)
  • 1662-4548
OpenAlex
W2088134342
Cited by
124
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 8
FWCI
13.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Frontiers in Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH086712, R01MH095894)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
vicarious reinforcement, rhesus monkeys, social learning, potential outcomes, observational learning, cooperation, attention to others, classical conditioning, operant conditioning, reward valuation, group decision making

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review