The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The promise of a DNA taxonomy
Open accessAbstract
Not only is the number of described species a very small proportion of the estimated extant number of taxa, but it also appears that all concepts of the extent and boundaries of ‘species’ fail in many cases. Using conserved molecular sequences it is possible to define and diagnose molecular operational taxonomic units (MOTU) that have a similar extent to traditional ‘species’. Use of a MOTU system not only allows the rapid and effective identification of most taxa, including those not encountered before, but also allows investigation of the evolution of patterns of diversity. A MOTU approach is not without problems, particularly in the area of deciding what level of molecular difference defines a biologically relevant taxon, but has many benefits. Molecular data are extremely well suited to re–analysis and meta–analysis, and data from multiple independent studies can be readily collated and investigated by using new parameters and assumptions. Previous molecular taxonomic efforts have focused narrowly. Advances in high–throughput sequencing methodologies, however, place the idea of a universal, multi–locus molecular barcoding system in the realm of the possible.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Base-Calling of Automated Sequencer Traces Using Phred. II. Error Probabilities
Ewing, B., & Green, P. (1998) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.8.3.186 · Cited by 5,439
Barcoding animal life: cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 divergences among closely related species
Hebert, P. D. N., Ratnasingham, S., & de Waard, J. R. (2003) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsbl.2003.0025 · Cited by 4,466
Hofreiter, M., Serre, D., Poinar, H. N., Kuch, M., & Pääbo, S. (2001) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/35072071 · Cited by 781
Hofreiter, M. (2001) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/29.23.4793 · Cited by 684
Cited by
ABGD, Automatic Barcode Gap Discovery for primary species delimitation
PUILLANDRE, N., LAMBERT, A., BROUILLET, S., & ACHAZ, G. (2012) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.2011.05239.x · Cited by 3,324
Sequence-Based Species Delimitation for the DNA Taxonomy of Undescribed Insects
Pons, J., Barraclough, T. G., Gomez-Zurita, J., Cardoso, A., Duran, D. P., Hazell, S., Kamoun, S., Sumlin, W. D., & Vogler, A. P. (2006) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1080/10635150600852011 · Cited by 2,775
Identification of Birds through DNA Barcodes
Hebert, P. D. N., Stoeckle, M. Y., Zemlak, T. S., & Francis, C. M. (2004) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0020312 · Cited by 2,653
DAYRAT, B. (2005) · Biological Journal of the Linnean Society · doi:10.1111/j.1095-8312.2005.00503.x · Cited by 2,007
DNA barcoding: how it complements taxonomy, molecular phylogenetics and population genetics
Hajibabaei, M., Singer, G. A. C., Hebert, P. D. N., & Hickey, D. A. (2007) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.tig.2007.02.001 · Cited by 1,160
Metadata
- Authors
- Blaxter, M. L.
- Venue
- Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 2004-04-29
- Volume
- 359
- Issue
- 1444
- Pages
- 669-679
- ISSN
- 0962-8436 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-2970
- OpenAlex
- W2116116608
- Cited by
- 553
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 32.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The promise of a DNA taxonomy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rstb.2003.1447
- The paper
- Blaxter, M. L. (2004). The promise of a DNA taxonomy. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2003.1447
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.