Towards integrative taxonomy
Abstract
Delineating species boundaries correctly is crucial to the discovery of life's diversity because it determines whether or not different individual organisms are members of the same entity. The gap in communication between the different disciplines currently involved in delimiting species is an important and overlooked problem in the so-called ‘taxonomy crisis’. To solve this problem, it is suggested that taxonomy become integrative, and this integration is seen as the real challenge for the future of taxonomy. ‘Integrative taxonomy’ is defined as the science that aims to delimit the units of life's diversity from multiple and complementary perspectives (phylogeography, comparative morphology, population genetics, ecology, development, behaviour, etc.). Some workers have already collaborated and successfully adopted an integrative approach to taxonomy. However, it is now time for the whole discipline to evolve. A radical change in mentality is needed concerning the creation of names in order to achieve this integration and to prevent the over-abundance of both synonyms and names of doubtful application from worsening. Integrative taxonomy gives priority to species delineation over the creation of new species names. Furthermore, it is emphasized that describing morphological diversity, referred to as ‘morphodiversity’, does not require the naming of any single set of specimens. Seven guidelines are proposed to help integrative taxonomists recognize cases when species are supported by broad biological evidence and therefore are deserving of an official name.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Contemporary mammal systematics focuses on evaluating the number of independent lines of evidence that support or refute distinctiveness of a taxon (integrative taxonomy).
“Contemporary mammal systematics now focuses on evaluating the number of independent lines of evidence that support or refute distinctiveness of a taxon (i.e., integrative taxonomy; Dayrat 2005; Padial”
From How many mammal species are there now? Updates and trends in taxonomic, nomenclatural, and geographic knowledge (2025) · cites this paper as Dayrat 2005
Cited by
Sorted by citations
DNA barcoding: error rates based on comprehensive sampling
Meyer, C. P., & Paulay, G. (2005) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0030422 · Cited by 1,957 · see citing works
Jones, F. C. (2008) · Environmental Reviews · doi:10.1139/a07-010 · Cited by 300 · see citing works
Shortfalls and opportunities in terrestrial vertebrate species discovery
Moura, M. R., & Jetz, W. (2021) · Nature Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1038/s41559-021-01411-5 · Cited by 196 · see citing works
Cryptic species conservation: a review
Hending, D. (2025) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/brv.13139 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Gómez Daglio, L., & Dawson, M. N. (2017) · Invertebrate Systematics · doi:10.1071/is16055 · Cited by 98 · see citing works
A paradigm shift in our view of species drives current trends in biological classification
Padial, J. M., & De la Riva, I. (2021) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/brv.12676 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Lawley, J. W., Gamero-Mora, E., Maronna, M. M., Chiaverano, L. M., Stampar, S. N., Hopcroft, R. R., Collins, A. G., & Morandini, A. C. (2021) · PeerJ · doi:10.7717/peerj.11954 · Cited by 71 · see citing works
“As genetic datasets necessary for species delimitation have grown, “integrative taxonomy” that explicitly incorporates molecular data (Dayrat, 2005) is becoming more common.”
BackgroundInfluentialBurgin, C. J., Zijlstra, J. S., Becker, M. A., Handika, H., Alston, J. M., Widness, J., Liphardt, S., Huckaby, D. G., & Upham, N. S. (2025) · Journal of Mammalogy · doi:10.1093/jmammal/gyaf047 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
- Authors
- DAYRAT, B.
- Venue
- Biological Journal of the Linnean Society
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2005-06-24
- Volume
- 85
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 407-415
- ISSN
- 0024-4066 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-8312
- OpenAlex
- W1949176574
- Cited by
- 2,007
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 132 · 2025: 128 · 2024: 126 · 2023: 146 · 2022: 138 · 2021: 155 · 2020: 168 · 2019: 147 · 2018: 129 · 2017: 120 · 2016: 96 · 2015: 99 · 2014: 78 · 2013: 80 · 2012: 57
- FWCI
- 21.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Biological Journal of the Linnean Society (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Invertebrate Taxonomy and Ecology
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Coleoptera Taxonomy and Distribution
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Plant Diversity and Evolution
- Keywords
- integrative taxonomy, species delimitation, species names, synonyms, phylogeography, population genetics, comparative morphology, nomenclature
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review