The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The unholy trinity: taxonomy, species delimitation and DNA barcoding
Open accessAbstract
Recent excitement over the development of an initiative to generate DNA sequences for all named species on the planet has in our opinion generated two major areas of contention as to how this ‘DNA barcoding’ initiative should proceed. It is critical that these two issues are clarified and resolved, before the use of DNA as a tool for taxonomy and species delimitation can be universalized. The first issue concerns how DNA data are to be used in the context of this initiative; this is the DNA barcode reader problem (or barcoder problem). Currently, many of the published studies under this initiative have used tree building methods and more precisely distance approaches to the construction of the trees that are used to place certain DNA sequences into a taxonomic context. The second problem involves the reaction of the taxonomic community to the directives of the ‘DNA barcoding’ initiative. This issue is extremely important in that the classical taxonomic approach and the DNA approach will need to be reconciled in order for the ‘DNA barcoding’ initiative to proceed with any kind of community acceptance. In fact, we feel that DNA barcoding is a misnomer. Our preference is for the title of the London meetings—Barcoding Life. In this paper we discuss these two concerns generated around the DNA barcoding initiative and attempt to present a phylogenetic systematic framework for an improved barcoder as well as a taxonomic framework for interweaving classical taxonomy with the goals of ‘DNA barcoding’.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Basic local alignment search tool
Altschul, S. F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E. W., & Lipman, D. J. (1990) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1990.9999 · Cited by 98,669
Barcoding animal life: cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 divergences among closely related species
Hebert, P. D. N., Ratnasingham, S., & de Waard, J. R. (2003) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsbl.2003.0025 · Cited by 4,466
Genome-scale approaches to resolving incongruence in molecular phylogenies.
Rokas, A., Williams, B. L., King, N., & Carroll, S. B. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02053 · Cited by 1,512
Gatesy, J., Baker, R., & Hayashi, C. (2004) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1080/10635150490423971 · Cited by 110
Cited by
The integrative future of taxonomy
Padial, J. M., Miralles, A., De la Riva, I., & Vences, M. (2010) · Frontiers in Zoology · doi:10.1186/1742-9994-7-16 · Cited by 1,915
DNA barcoding: how it complements taxonomy, molecular phylogenetics and population genetics
Hajibabaei, M., Singer, G. A. C., Hebert, P. D. N., & Hickey, D. A. (2007) · Trends in Genetics · doi:10.1016/j.tig.2007.02.001 · Cited by 1,160
Quantitative criteria for species delimitation
TOBIAS, J. A., SEDDON, N., SPOTTISWOODE, C. N., PILGRIM, J. D., FISHPOOL, L. D. C., & COLLAR, N. J. (2010) · Ibis · doi:10.1111/j.1474-919x.2010.01051.x · Cited by 1,092
Integrative Taxonomy: A Multisource Approach to Exploring Biodiversity
Schlick-Steiner, B. C., Steiner, F. M., Seifert, B., Stauffer, C., Christian, E., & Crozier, R. H. (2010) · Annual Review of Entomology · doi:10.1146/annurev-ento-112408-085432 · Cited by 1,080
Delimiting Species without Monophyletic Gene Trees
Knowles, L. L., & Carstens, B. C. (2007) · Systematic Biology · doi:10.1080/10635150701701091 · Cited by 788
Metadata
- Authors
- DeSalle, R., Egan, M. G., & Siddall, M.
- Venue
- Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 2005-09-14
- Volume
- 360
- Issue
- 1462
- Pages
- 1905-1916
- ISSN
- 0962-8436 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-2970
- OpenAlex
- W1995824068
- Cited by
- 942
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 31.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The unholy trinity: taxonomy, species delimitation and DNA barcoding. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rstb.2005.1722
- The paper
- DeSalle, R., Egan, M. G., & Siddall, M. (2005). The unholy trinity: taxonomy, species delimitation and DNA barcoding. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2005.1722
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.