Cited by 36Prion Diseases and Protein MisfoldingDeath, Funerary Practices, and MourningPacific and Southeast Asian Studies

Mortuary rites of the South Fore and kuru

Open access
Whitfield, Jerome T, Pako, Wandagi H, Collinge, John, Alpers, Michael P·2008·Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Abstract

This paper is part of a wider study to explain the historical spread and changing epidemiological patterns of kuru by analysing factors that affect the transmission of kuru. Part of the study has been to look at the mortuary feasts that were the means of transmission of the kuru agent. This paper shows the complexity of Fore eschatology, and the variations and contradictions of human behaviour in relation to mortuary rites and the transmission of kuru. It also confirms that oral ingestion was the primary route of inoculation though some cases of parenteral inoculation may have occurred. The exclusion of alternative routes of transmission is of importance owing to the dietary exposure of the UK and other populations to bovine spongiform encephalopathy prions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rstb.2008.0074

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Fore did not talk about rubbing their bodies with brain tissue when describing earlier events and have recently denied the practice.

    “However, the Fore did not talk about rubbing their bodies with brain tissue when describing earlier events and have recently denied the practice (52).”

    From Kuru (2012) · cites this paper as [52]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) concludes that intentional rubbing of brain tissue on mourners did not occur, and §5 says it was never rubbed on their bodies. These passages support the paper’s account of the practice, but do not establish the specific claims that the Fore omitted it when describing earlier events or recently denied it. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A recent investigation of Fore mortuary practices has shown that, by consuming deceased relatives, the Fore were ensuring that the souls of the departed reached the land of the dead, to be reborn as ancestors.

    “A recent investigation of Fore mortuary practices has shown that, by consuming deceased relatives, the Fore were ensuring that the souls of the departed reached the land of the dead, to be reborn as ancestors (52).”

    From Kuru (2012) · cites this paper as [52]

  • The Fore still believe that kuru is caused by malicious sorcerers.

    “The Fore still believe that kuru is caused by malicious sorcerers”

    From Kuru (2012) · cites this paper as [52]

    The Introduction discusses mortuary practices and kuru transmission, while section 3 mentions sorcerers only in describing a person's occult power. Neither passage says that the Fore still believe malicious sorcerers cause kuru. Searches for sorcery, current beliefs, and explanations of kuru found no passage establishing that claim; no page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Alpers, M. P. 1968 Kuru: implications of its transmissibility for the interpretation of its changing epidemiologic pattern. In The central nervous system: some experimental models of neurological diseases, International Academy of Pathology Monograph no. 9 (eds O. T. Bailey & D. E. Smith), pp. 234–251. Baltimore, MD: Williams and Wilkins.
  2. Alpers M.P. A history of kuru PNG Med. J 50 2007 10 19 19354007
  3. Berndt R.M. Excess and restraint: social control among a New Guinea mountain people 1962 University of Chicago Press Chicago, IL
  4. Gajdusek, D. C. 1971 Introductory remarks. Introduction of the paper of Dr. Holmes. In Proc. Conf. on Atypical Virus Infections: Possible Relevance to Animal Models and Rheumatic Disease, Atlanta, Georgia, 7–8 December 1968 (eds C. L. Christian, P. E. Phillips & R. C. Williams Jr), pp. 131, 160–162. New York, NY: The Arthritis Foundation.
  5. Glasse, R. M. 1967 Cannibalism in the kuru region of New Guinea. Trans. NY Acad. Sci. (Series 2) 29, 748–754. 5234844
  6. Klitzman R.L. Alpers M.P. Gajdusek D.C. The natural incubation period of kuru and the episodes of transmission in three clusters of patients Neuroepidemiology 3 1984 3 20 doi:10.1159/000110837 · DOI
  7. Mathews J.D. Glasse R. Lindenbaum S. Kuru and cannibalism Lancet 2 1968 449 452 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(68)90482-0 4174170 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Whitfield, J. T., Pako, W. H., Collinge, J., & Alpers, M. P.
Affiliations
  • Curtin University (AU)
  • Papua New Guinea Institute of Medical Research (PG)
  • MRC Prion Unit (GB)
Corresponding author
Whitfield, Jerome T
Venue
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Published
2008-11-27
Volume
363
Issue
1510
Pages
3721-3724
ISSN
  • 0962-8436 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-2970
OpenAlex
W2077450109
Cited by
36
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
0.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • eSpace (Curtin University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Prion Diseases and Protein Misfolding
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Death, Funerary Practices, and Mourning
  • Social Sciences › Geography, Planning and Development › Pacific and Southeast Asian Studies
Keywords
kuru, funerary practices, Fore people, eschatology, prion transmission, oral transmission, blood-borne transmission, bovine spongiform encephalopathy, prion disease
MeSH terms
Cannibalism, Ethnicity, Folklore, Humans, Kuru, Mortuary Practice, Papua New Guinea, History, 20th Century

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review