The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Recombination rate variation and speciation: theoretical predictions and empirical results from rabbits and mice
Open accessAbstract
Recently diverged taxa may continue to exchange genes. A number of models of speciation with gene flow propose that the frequency of gene exchange will be lower in genomic regions of low recombination and that these regions will therefore be more differentiated. However, several population-genetic models that focus on selection at linked sites also predict greater differentiation in regions of low recombination simply as a result of faster sorting of ancestral alleles even in the absence of gene flow. Moreover, identifying the actual amount of gene flow from patterns of genetic variation is tricky, because both ancestral polymorphism and migration lead to shared variation between recently diverged taxa. New analytic methods have been developed to help distinguish ancestral polymorphism from migration. Along with a growing number of datasets of multi-locus DNA sequence variation, these methods have spawned a renewed interest in speciation models with gene flow. Here, we review both speciation and population-genetic models that make explicit predictions about how the rate of recombination influences patterns of genetic variation within and between species. We then compare those predictions with empirical data of DNA sequence variation in rabbits and mice. We find strong support for the prediction that genomic regions experiencing low levels of recombination are more differentiated. In most cases, reduced gene flow appears to contribute to the pattern, although disentangling the relative contribution of reduced gene flow and selection at linked sites remains a challenge. We suggest fruitful areas of research that might help distinguish between different models.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable gene
Smith, J. M., & Haigh, J. (1974) · Genetical Research · doi:10.1017/s0016672300014634 · Cited by 3,415
Gutenkunst, R. N., Hernandez, R. D., Williamson, S. H., & Bustamante, C. D. (2009) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000695 · Cited by 1,906
Chromosomal rearrangements and speciation
Rieseberg, L. H. (2001) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/s0169-5347(01)02187-5 · Cited by 1,457
Markov chain Monte Carlo without likelihoods
Marjoram, P., Molitor, J., Plagnol, V., & Tavaré, S. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0306899100 · Cited by 1,199
Drive Against Hotspot Motifs in Primates Implicates the PRDM9 Gene in Meiotic Recombination
Myers, S., Bowden, R., Tumian, A., Bontrop, R. E., Freeman, C., MacFie, T. S., McVean, G., & Donnelly, P. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1182363 · Cited by 683
Sympatric speciation in palms on an oceanic island
Savolainen, V., Anstett, M.-C., Lexer, C., Hutton, I., Clarkson, J. J., Norup, M. V., Powell, M. P., Springate, D., Salamin, N., & Baker, W. J. (2006) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature04566 · Cited by 681
Prdm9 Controls Activation of Mammalian Recombination Hotspots
Parvanov, E. D., Petkov, P. M., & Paigen, K. (2010) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1181495 · Cited by 610
Interpreting the estimated timing of migration events between hybridizing species
STRASBURG, J. L., & RIESEBERG, L. H. (2011) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.2011.05048.x · Cited by 79
Cited by
Climate change, adaptation, and phenotypic plasticity: the problem and the evidence
Merilä, J., & Hendry, A. P. (2014) · Evolutionary Applications · doi:10.1111/eva.12137 · Cited by 1,369
Cruickshank, T. E., & Hahn, M. W. (2014) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/mec.12796 · Cited by 1,061
Genomics and the origin of species
Seehausen, O., Butlin, R. K., Keller, I., Wagner, C. E., Boughman, J. W., Hohenlohe, P. A., Peichel, C. L., Saetre, G.-P., Bank, C., Brännström, Å., et al. (2014) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3644 · Cited by 1,016
Self-citationFinding the genomic basis of local adaptation: pitfalls, practical solutions, and future directions
Hoban, S., Kelley, J. L., Lotterhos, K. E., Antolin, M. F., Bradburd, G., Lowry, D. B., Poss, M. L., Reed, L. K., Storfer, A., & Whitlock, M. C. (2016) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/688018 · Cited by 876
Hybridization, Introgression, and the Nature of Species Boundaries
(2014) · Journal of Heredity · doi:10.1093/jhered/esu033 · Cited by 745
Metadata
- Authors
- Nachman, M. W., & Payseur, B. A.
- Venue
- Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 2012-02-05
- Volume
- 367
- Issue
- 1587
- Pages
- 409-421
- ISSN
- 0962-8436 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-2970
- OpenAlex
- W2159580843
- Cited by
- 376
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 9.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Recombination rate variation and speciation: theoretical predictions and empirical results from rabbits and mice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rstb.2011.0249
- The paper
- Nachman, M. W., & Payseur, B. A. (2012). Recombination rate variation and speciation: theoretical predictions and empirical results from rabbits and mice. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2011.0249
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.