Cited by 1,582Child and Animal Learning DevelopmentPrimate Behavior and EcologyLanguage and cultural evolution

Humans Have Evolved Specialized Skills of Social Cognition: The Cultural Intelligence Hypothesis

Herrmann, Esther, Call, Josep, Hernàndez-Lloreda, María Victoria, Hare, Brian, Tomasello, Michael·2007·Science

Abstract

Humans have many cognitive skills not possessed by their nearest primate relatives. The cultural intelligence hypothesis argues that this is mainly due to a species-specific set of social-cognitive skills, emerging early in ontogeny, for participating and exchanging knowledge in cultural groups. We tested this hypothesis by giving a comprehensive battery of cognitive tests to large numbers of two of humans' closest primate relatives, chimpanzees and orangutans, as well as to 2.5-year-old human children before literacy and schooling. Supporting the cultural intelligence hypothesis and contradicting the hypothesis that humans simply have more “general intelligence,” we found that the children and chimpanzees had very similar cognitive skills for dealing with the physical world but that the children had more sophisticated cognitive skills than either of the ape species for dealing with the social world.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.1146282

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • People develop a vast array of their capabilities through the process of social learning.

    “People develop a vast array of their capabilities through the process of social learning (Henrich, 2017; Herrmann et al., 2007; Heyes, 2018; Tomasello, 1999).”

    From Stories in Action. (2022) · cites this paper as Herrmann et al., 2007

  • In many cases, domains of cognition rather than performance on single tasks are most interesting for comparative analysis.

    “in many cases, it is domains of cognition rather than performance on single tasks that is most interesting for comparative analysis (e.g., Herrmann et al. 2007).”

    From How does cognition evolve? Phylogenetic comparative psychology (2012) · cites this paper as Herrmann et al. 2007

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Herrmann, E., Call, J., Hernàndez-Lloreda, M. V., Hare, B., & Tomasello, M.
Affiliations
  • Universidad Complutense de Madrid (ES)
  • Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, D-04103, Germany.
Corresponding author
Herrmann, Esther
Venue
Science
Published
2007-09-07
Volume
317
Issue
5843
Pages
1360-1366
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W1979486681
Cited by
1,582
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 49 · 2025: 89 · 2024: 102 · 2023: 83 · 2022: 113 · 2021: 94 · 2020: 103 · 2019: 129 · 2018: 117 · 2017: 93 · 2016: 80 · 2015: 56 · 2014: 75 · 2013: 81 · 2012: 100
FWCI
78.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Language and cultural evolution
Keywords
social cognition, human evolution, chimpanzees, orangutans, child cognitive development, primate cognition, general intelligence
MeSH terms
Animals, Child Development, Child, Preschool, Pan troglodytes, Cognition, Cultural Evolution, Culture, Biological Evolution, Female, Humans, Intelligence Tests, Male, Organ Size, Pongo pygmaeus, Species Specificity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review