Cited by 284Language and cultural evolutionEvolutionary Game Theory and CooperationEvolution and Genetic Dynamics

How Darwinian is cultural evolution?

Open access
Claidière, Nicolas, Scott-Phillips, Thomas C., Sperber, Dan·2014·Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Abstract

Darwin-inspired population thinking suggests approaching culture as a population of items of different types, whose relative frequencies may change over time. Three nested subtypes of populational models can be distinguished: evolutionary, selectional and replicative. Substantial progress has been made in the study of cultural evolution by modelling it within the selectional frame. This progress has involved idealizing away from phenomena that may be critical to an adequate understanding of culture and cultural evolution, particularly the constructive aspect of the mechanisms of cultural transmission. Taking these aspects into account, we describe cultural evolution in terms of cultural attraction , which is populational and evolutionary, but only selectional under certain circumstances. As such, in order to model cultural evolution, we must not simply adjust existing replicative or selectional models but we should rather generalize them, so that, just as replicator-based selection is one form that Darwinian selection can take, selection itself is one of several different forms that attraction can take. We present an elementary formalization of the idea of cultural attraction.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rstb.2013.0368

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Humans may favour machines catering to non-factual stories and narratives that match concepts and ideas preferred by human cognition, such as those appealing to intuitive expectations about the natural world or to specific religious practices.

    “For instance, humans may favour machines catering to non-factual stories and narratives that match concepts and ideas preferred by human cognition 157 , such as those appealing to intuitive expectations about the natural world 158,159 or to specific religious practices 160 .”

    From Machine culture (2023) · cites this paper as [158]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [1]Aunger R (ed.) 2000 Darwinizing culture. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  2. [7]Mesoudi A 2011 Cultural evolution. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  3. [30]Claidière N 2009 Darwinian theories of cultural evolution: models and mechanisms. PhD dissertation Ecole Normale Supérieure & Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Claidière, N., Scott-Phillips, T. C., & Sperber, D.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Evolutionary Anthropology Research Group, Department of Anthropology, Durham University, Dawson Building, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE, UK
Venue
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Published
2014-05-19
Volume
369
Issue
1642
Pages
20130368
ISSN
  • 0962-8436 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-2970
OpenAlex
W2111925413
Cited by
284
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 1
FWCI
241.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • Durham Research Online (Durham University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Funders
Economic and Social Research Council (ES/K001647/1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Language and cultural evolution
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
Keywords
cultural evolution, Darwinian selection, cultural attractions, cultural transmission, replicator dynamics, evolutionary models, population thinking
MeSH terms
Cultural Evolution, Humans, Models, Theoretical, Population Dynamics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review