Cited by 551Action Observation and SynchronizationMotor Control and AdaptationFree Will and Agency

Automatic imitation

Heyes, Cecilia·2011·Psychological Bulletin

Abstract

"Automatic imitation" is a type of stimulus-response compatibility effect in which the topographical features of task-irrelevant action stimuli facilitate similar, and interfere with dissimilar, responses. This article reviews behavioral, neurophysiological, and neuroimaging research on automatic imitation, asking in what sense it is "automatic" and whether it is "imitation." This body of research reveals that automatic imitation is a covert form of imitation, distinct from spatial compatibility. It also indicates that, although automatic imitation is subject to input modulation by attentional processes, and output modulation by inhibitory processes, it is mediated by learned, long-term sensorimotor associations that cannot be altered directly by intentional processes. Automatic imitation provides an important tool for the investigation of the mirror neuron system, motor mimicry, and complex forms of imitation. It is a new behavioral phenomenon, comparable with the Stroop and Simon effects, providing strong evidence that even healthy adult humans are prone, in an unwilled and unreasoned way, to copy the actions of others.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0022288

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Humans show robust automatic imitation when they observe hand, arm, foot and mouth movements.

    “Humans show robust automatic imitation when they observe hand, arm, foot and mouth movements (Heyes, 2011).”

    From Mirror neurons: from origin to function (2014) · cites this paper as Heyes, 2011

  • Observing a congruent action speeds up an unrelated task response, whereas observing an incongruent action slows it down.

    “In cognitive psychology, it is studied by means of automatic imitation -the finding that observing congruent actions facilitates, whereas observing incongruent actions impedes, unrelated task responses (Brass et al., 2000;Cracco, Bardi, et al., 2018;Heyes, 2011;Sturmer, Aschersleben, & Prinz, 2000).”

    From Automatic imitation of multiple agents: A computational model (2019) · cites this paper as Heyes, 2011

  • The cue activates short-term intentional stimulus-response associations formed for the task, while the observed movement activates long-term automatic stimulus-response associations formed through genetic disposition or learning.

    “In particular, the cue is thought to activate short-term intentional stimulus-response (S-R) associations established solely for the purpose of the task, whereas the stimulus movement instead activates long-term automatic S-R associations established as a consequence of genetic disposition or learning experience (Heyes, 2011).”

    From Automatic imitation of multiple agents: A computational model (2019) · cites this paper as Heyes, 2011

  • The dual-route framework treats the imperative cue and the observed movement as being processed along separate routes.

    “An influential framework to interpret automatic imitation is the dual-route framework (Heyes, 2011), which assumes that the imperative cue and the stimulus movement operate via different routes.”

    From Automatic imitation of multiple agents: A computational model (2019) · cites this paper as Heyes, 2011

  • The general compatibility effect includes a spatial component.

    “The most common measure of imitation inhibition, the general compatibility effect, also includes a spatial component (Heyes, 2011).”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Heyes, C.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Heyes, Cecilia
Venue
Psychological Bulletin
Published
2011
Volume
137
Issue
3
Pages
463-483
ISSN
  • 0033-2909 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1455
OpenAlex
W4240799150
Cited by
550
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 51 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 42 · 2017: 38 · 2016: 47 · 2015: 46 · 2014: 34 · 2013: 49 · 2012: 24
FWCI
50.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychological Bulletin (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Free Will and Agency
Keywords
automatic imitation, stimulus-response compatibility, mirror neuron system, sensorimotor associations, attentional modulation, inhibitory processes, action observation, spatial compatibility
MeSH terms
Humans, Imitative Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review