The DOI matches its Crossref record; 56 of the 56 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The livestock reservoir for antimicrobial resistance: a personal view on changing patterns of risks, effects of interventions and the way forward
Open accessAbstract
The purpose of this review was to provide an updated overview on the use of antimicrobial agents in livestock, the associated problems for humans and current knowledge on the effects of reducing resistance in the livestock reservoir on both human health and animal production. There is still limiting data on both use of antimicrobial agents, occurrence and spread of resistance as well as impact on human health. However, in recent years, emerging issues related to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus , Clostridium difficile , Escherichia coli and horizontally transferred genes indicates that the livestock reservoir has a more significant impact on human health than was estimated 10 years ago, where the focus was mainly on resistance in Campylobacter and Salmonella . Studies have indicated that there might only be a marginal if any benefit from the regular use of antibiotics and have shown that it is possible to substantially reduce the use of antimicrobial agents in livestock production without compromising animal welfare or health or production. In some cases, this should be done in combination with other measures such as biosecurity and use of vaccines. To enable better studies on both the global burden and the effect of interventions, there is a need for global harmonized integrated and continuous surveillance of antimicrobial usage and antimicrobial resistance, preferably associated with data on production and animal diseases to determine the positive and negative impact of reducing antimicrobial use in livestock.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Call of the wild: antibiotic resistance genes in natural environments
Allen, H. K., Donato, J., Wang, H. H., Cloud-Hansen, K. A., Davies, J., & Handelsman, J. (2010) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2312 · Cited by 2,361
Food Animals and Antimicrobials: Impacts on Human Health
Marshall, B. M., & Levy, S. B. (2011) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00002-11 · Cited by 2,241
Fleming, A. (1929) · PubMed Central · Cited by 1,647
García-Álvarez, L., Holden, M. T., Lindsay, H., Webb, C. R., Brown, D. F., Curran, M. D., Walpole, E., Brooks, K., Pickard, D. J., Teale, C., et al. (2011) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(11)70126-8 · Cited by 939
Staphylococcus aureus CC398: Host Adaptation and Emergence of Methicillin Resistance in Livestock
Price, L. B., Stegger, M., Hasman, H., Aziz, M., Larsen, J., Andersen, P. S., Pearson, T., Waters, A. E., Foster, J. T., Schupp, J., et al. (2012) · mBio · doi:10.1128/mbio.00305-11 · Cited by 858
Self-citationAntibiotic resistance in the environment: a link to the clinic?
Wright, G. D. (2010) · Current Opinion in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.mib.2010.08.005 · Cited by 831
Further Observations on Penicillin
Abraham, E. P., Chain, E., Fletcher, C. M., Gardner, A. D., Heatley, N. G., Jennings, M. A., & Florey, H. W. (1941) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(00)72122-2 · Cited by 821
Transforming clinical microbiology with bacterial genome sequencing
Didelot, X., Bowden, R., Wilson, D. J., Peto, T. E. A., & Crook, D. W. (2012) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg3226 · Cited by 799
The evolving threat of antimicrobial resistance: Options for action
Kapi, A. (2014) · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · Cited by 714
Rapid Whole-Genome Sequencing for Investigation of a Neonatal MRSA Outbreak
Köser, C. U., Holden, M. T. G., Ellington, M. J., Cartwright, E. J. P., Brown, N. M., Ogilvy-Stuart, A. L., Hsu, L. Y., Chewapreecha, C., Croucher, N. J., Harris, S. R., et al. (2012) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1109910 · Cited by 654
Cited by
Global monitoring of antimicrobial resistance based on metagenomics analyses of urban sewage
Hendriksen, R. S., Munk, P., Njage, P., van Bunnik, B., McNally, L., Lukjancenko, O., Röder, T., Nieuwenhuijse, D., Pedersen, S. K., Kjeldgaard, J., et al. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-08853-3 · Cited by 1,199
Self-citationSalmonellosis: the role of poultry meat
Antunes, P., Mourão, J., Campos, J., & Peixe, L. (2016) · Clinical Microbiology and Infection · doi:10.1016/j.cmi.2015.12.004 · Cited by 620
Cabello, F. C., Godfrey, H. P., Buschmann, A. H., & Dölz, H. J. (2016) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(16)00100-6 · Cited by 507
Munk, P., Knudsen, B. E., Lukjancenko, O., Duarte, A. S. R., Van Gompel, L., Luiken, R. E. C., Smit, L. A. M., Schmitt, H., Garcia, A. D., Hansen, R. B., et al. (2018) · Nature Microbiology · doi:10.1038/s41564-018-0192-9 · Cited by 355
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Aarestrup, F. M.
- Venue
- Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 2015-06-05
- Volume
- 370
- Issue
- 1670
- Pages
- 20140085
- ISSN
- 0962-8436 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-2970
- OpenAlex
- W1977678315
- Cited by
- 298
- References
- 56
- FWCI
- 13.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The livestock reservoir for antimicrobial resistance: a personal view on changing patterns of risks, effects of interventions and the way forward. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rstb.2014.0085
- The paper
- Aarestrup, F. M. (2015). The livestock reservoir for antimicrobial resistance: a personal view on changing patterns of risks, effects of interventions and the way forward. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2014.0085
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
