Cited by 192Animal Behavior and ReproductionMathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology ModelsComplex Network Analysis Techniques

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Infectious disease and group size: more than just a numbers game

Open access
Nunn, Charles L., Jordán, Ferenc, McCabe, Collin M., Verdolin, Jennifer L., Fewell, Jennifer H.·2015·Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Abstract

Increased risk of infectious disease is assumed to be a major cost of group living, yet empirical evidence for this effect is mixed. We studied whether larger social groups are more subdivided structurally. If so, the social subdivisions that form in larger groups may act as barriers to the spread of infection, weakening the association between group size and infectious disease. To investigate this ‘social bottleneck’ hypothesis, we examined the association between group size and four network structure metrics in 43 vertebrate and invertebrate species. We focused on metrics involving modularity, clustering, distance and centralization. In a meta-analysis of intraspecific variation in social networks, modularity showed positive associations with network size, with a weaker but still positive effect in cross-species analyses. Network distance also showed a positive association with group size when using intraspecific variation. We then used a theoretical model to explore the effects of subgrouping relative to other effects that influence disease spread in socially structured populations. Outbreaks reached higher prevalence when groups were larger, but subgrouping reduced prevalence. Subgrouping also acted as a ‘brake’ on disease spread between groups. We suggest research directions to understand the conditions under which larger groups become more subdivided, and to devise new metrics that account for subgrouping when investigating the links between sociality and infectious disease risk.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rstb.2014.0111

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 0 references

Research works printed but not linked: 67

  1. 10.2307/1936609 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/S0065-3454(08)60405-2 · DOI
  3. 10.2307/1941192 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.34.030102.151725 · DOI
  5. 10.1645/GE-310R · DOI
  6. 10.1093/beheco/arh028 · DOI
  7. 10.2307/2389485 · DOI
  8. 10.1007/s00265-005-0005-z · DOI
  9. 10.1093/molbev/msp018 · DOI
  10. 10.1093/beheco/4.1.36 · DOI
  11. 10.1126/science.290.5494.1168 · DOI
  12. 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2002.tb00859.x · DOI
  13. 10.1098/rspb.2001.1950 · DOI
  14. 10.1006/jtbi.2001.2524 · DOI
  15. Schmid-Hempel P, 1998, Parasites in social insects
  16. 10.1098/rstb.2014.0102 · DOI
  17. 10.1098/rstb.2014.0108 · DOI
  18. 10.1007/s00442-007-0834-8 · DOI
  19. 10.1007/s002650050523 · DOI
  20. 10.1051/apido:19870401 · DOI
  21. 10.1093/jee/49.6.831 · DOI
  22. 10.1163/156853992X00011 · DOI
  23. 10.1093/beheco/6.2.159 · DOI
  24. 10.2307/3565589 · DOI
  25. 10.1098/rsbl.2007.0393 · DOI
  26. 10.1086/666081 · DOI
  27. 10.1017/S0031182012002259 · DOI
  28. Cohen J, 1988, Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
  29. 10.1007/s10682-011-9526-2 · DOI
  30. 10.1098/rsif.2014.0349 · DOI
  31. 10.1371/journal.pone.0095039 · DOI
  32. 10.7208/chicago/9780226090009.001.0001 · DOI
  33. 10.1007/978-3-662-43550-2 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1098/rstb.2014.0107 · DOI
  35. 10.1073/pnas.0712149105 · DOI
  36. R Development Core Team, 2014, R: A language and environment for statistical computing
  37. Csardi G, 2006, The igraph software package for complex network research, InterJournal Complex Syst., 1695
  38. 10.1103/PhysRevE.60.7332 · DOI
  39. 10.1007/s00265-008-0600-x · DOI
  40. 10.1016/j.socnet.2010.03.006 · DOI
  41. 10.1007/BF01386390 · DOI
  42. Opsahl T, 2009, Structure and evolution of weighted networks
  43. 10.1073/pnas.96.8.4472 · DOI
  44. 10.1007/s10329-009-0153-2 · DOI
  45. Borenstein M, 2005, Comprehensive meta-analysis
  46. Lajeunesse M, 2009, Meta Analysis and the Comparative Phylogenetic Method, Am. Nat., 174, 369, 10.1086/603628 · DOI
  47. Lajeunesse MJ, 2011, phyloMeta: a program for phylogenetic comparative analyses with meta-analysis, Bioinformatics, 27, 2603, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr438 · DOI
  48. Orme D Freckleton R Thomas G Petzoldt T Fritz S& Isaac N. 2011 caper: comparative analyses of phylogenetics and evolution in R. See http://R-Forge.R-project.org/projects/caper/. · DOI
  49. 10.1038/44766 · DOI · Paper page
  50. 10.1086/343873 · DOI · Paper page
  51. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl505 · DOI · Paper page
  52. 10.1073/pnas.0605858103 · DOI
  53. 10.1007/s10682-007-9180-x · DOI
  54. 10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.02.023 · DOI
  55. 10.1016/0020-7101(88)90067-0 · DOI
  56. 10.2307/1403510 · DOI
  57. 10.1046/j.1365-2664.2000.00553.x · DOI
  58. Burnham KP, 2002, Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach
  59. 10.18637/jss.v019.i09 · DOI
  60. Gramacy RB, 2012, Categorical inputs, sensitivity analysis, optimization and importance tempering with tgp version 2, an R package for treed Gaussian process models, J. Stat. Soft., 33, 1
  61. Wlasiuk G, 2010, Promiscuity and the rate of molecular evolution at primate immunity genes, Evolution, 64, 2204
  62. Nunn CL, 2002, Spleen size, disease risk and sexual selection: a comparative study in primates, Evol. Ecol. Res., 4, 91
  63. 10.1038/nature05260 · DOI
  64. 10.1111/j.1365-2583.2006.00682.x · DOI
  65. 10.1016/j.cub.2007.06.008 · DOI
  66. 10.1007/s00040-013-0282-x · DOI
  67. 10.1371/journal.pone.0021677 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–163 of 163

Metadata

Authors
Nunn, C. L., Jordán, F., McCabe, C. M., Verdolin, J. L., & Fewell, J. H.
Affiliations
  • Duke University (US)
  • University of Trento (IT)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Arizona State University (US)
Corresponding author
Nunn, Charles L.
Venue
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Published
2015-05-26
Volume
370
Issue
1669
Pages
20140111
ISSN
  • 0962-8436 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-2970
OpenAlex
W1966269069
Cited by
192
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 5
FWCI
2.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Applied Mathematics › Mathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Network Analysis Techniques
Keywords
infectious diseases, group size, social networks, network modularity, network distance, network centralization, network clustering, disease spread, sociality, animal social structure, vertebrates, invertebrates
MeSH terms
Animals, Behavior, Animal, Communicable Diseases, Invertebrates, Models, Biological, Population Density, Risk Factors, Social Behavior, Species Specificity, Vertebrates

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review