The DOI matches its Crossref record.
When does matriliny fail? The frequencies and causes of transitions to and from matriliny estimated from a de novo coding of a cross-cultural sample
Abstract
The question of when and why societies have transitioned away from matriliny to other types of kinship systems—and when and why they transition towards matriliny—has a long history in anthropology, one that is heavily engaged with both evolutionary theory and cross-cultural research methods. This article presents tabulations from a new coding of ethnographic documents from the Standard Cross-Cultural Sample (SCCS), tallying claims of transitions in kinship systems both away from and to matriliny using various levels of stringency. We then use our counts as the outcome variables in a set of Bayesian analyses that simultaneously estimate the probability of a transition occurring given societal covariates alongside the conditional probability of detecting a transition given the volume of ethnographic data available to code. Our goal is to estimate the cross-cultural and comparative frequency of transitions away from and to matriliny, as well as to explore potential causes underlying these patterns. We find that transitions away from matriliny have been significantly more common than ‘reverse transitions' to matriliny. Our evidence suggests that both rates may be, in part, an artefact of the colonial and globalizing period during which the data comprising much of the current ethnographic record were recorded. Analyses of the correlates of transitions away from matriliny are consistent with several of the key causal arguments made by anthropologists over the past century, especially with respect to subsistence transition (to pastoralism, intensive agriculture and market economies), social complexity and colonialism, highlighting the importance of ecological factors in such transitions. This article is part of the theme issue ‘The evolution of female-biased kinship in humans and other mammals’.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Alternatively the change in kinship systems may have occurred later, when agro-pastoral economies intensified, which led to higher degree of wealth accumulation and transmission66. This may have transformed social organisations towards patrilocality and father-to-son transmission41,42.”
From Patrilineal segmentary systems provide a peaceful explanation for the post-Neolithic Y-chromosome bottleneck (2024) · cites this paper as [42]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 90
- Morgan LH, 1877, Ancient society
- Murdock GP, 1949, Social structure
- Schneider DM, 1961, Matrilineal kinship, 1
- Stone L. 2014 Kinship and gender: an introduction. New York NY: Routledge.
- Schneider DM, 1961, Matrilineal kinship
- 10.2307/3772907 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/9781444302714.ch3 · DOI
- Bachofen JJ, Myth, religion, and mother right: selected writings of J. J. Bachofen
- Gough K, 1961, Matrilineal kinship, 445
- Gough K, 1961, Matrilineal kinship, 631
- Douglas M, 1969, Man in Africa, 121
- Darwin CR, 1859, On the origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life, 10.5962/bhl.title.82303 · DOI
- Tylor EB, 1871, Primitive culture: volume 1
- Tylor EB, 1871, Primitive culture: volume 2
- Morgan LH, 1871, Systems of consanguinity and affinity of the human family
- Engels F, 1884, The origins of the family, private property and the state
- Junod HA, 1927, Life of a South African tribe: Vol. 1
- 10.5479/sil.120833.39088000479063 · DOI
- Riasanovsky VA, 1937, Fundamental principles of Mongolian law
- Knight C, 2007, Émergence et évolution de la parenté, 25
- Boas F, 1897, The Social Organization and the Secret Societies of the Kwakiutl Indians. Washington: Report of the U.S. National Museum, 1895
- 10.1002/j.1834-4461.1931.tb00015.x · DOI
- Lowie RH, 1920, Primitive society
- Leach ER, 1961, Rethinking anthropology
- Malinowski B, 1927, Sex and repression in savage society
- Speck FG, 1922, Micmac hunting territories in Nova Scotia and Newfoundland
- 10.1525/ae.1977.4.3.02a00090 · DOI
- Radcliffe-Brown AR, 1952, Structure and function in primitive society
- Malinowski B, 1939, The group and the individual in functional analysis, AJS, 44, 938
- 10.1007/s12110-011-9107-7 · DOI
- Richards AI, 1950, African systems of kinship and marriage, 83
- Tylor EB, 1896, The matriarchal family system, Nineteenth Century, 40, 81
- 10.1098/rstb.2018.0080 · DOI
- 10.1098/rstb.2018.0072 · DOI
- 10.1525/aa.1971.73.3.02a00040 · DOI
- Labby D, 1976, The demystification of Yap: dialectics of culture on a Micronesian island
- Murdock GP, 1959, Evolution and anthropology: a centennial appraisal, 126
- Murdock GP, 1959, Africa: its peoples and their culture history
- 10.1525/aa.1956.58.3.02a00030 · DOI
- Gsell S, Histoire ancienne de l'Afrique du Nord
- Nicolaisen J, 1963, Ecology and culture of the pastoral Tuareg: with particular reference to the Tuareg of Ahaggar and Ayr
- Aberle D, 1961, Matrilineal kinship, 655
- 10.1098/rspb.2003.2535 · DOI
- 10.2307/586694 · DOI
- 10.1177/106939717400900201 · DOI
- 10.1007/s12110-011-9105-9 · DOI
- 10.1016/S1090-5138(02)00122-8 · DOI
- 10.1098/rstb.2010.0017 · DOI
- Gluckman M, 1950, African systems of kinship and marriage, 166
- 10.2307/1158464 · DOI
- 10.1525/aa.1989.91.3.02a00050 · DOI
- 10.1016/0162-3095(80)90015-1 · DOI
- 10.1525/ae.1978.5.1.02a00110 · DOI
- Flinn M, 1981, Uterine vs. agnatic kinship variability and associated cousin marriage preferences: an evolutionary biological analysis, Nat. Sel. Social Behav., 26, 439
- 10.1017/S0140525X00045520 · DOI
- 10.1016/0022-5193(64)90038-4 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0022-5193(64)90039-6 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev.es.05.110174.001545 · DOI
- 10.1098/rspb.2012.1926 · DOI
- 10.1086/202775 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.179.4068.90 · DOI
- 10.1080/14442211003730736 · DOI
- 10.1098/rstb.2010.0017 · DOI
- 10.1098/rspb.2009.0088 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1017/CBO9780511542466.019 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2018.06.002 · DOI
- Opie C Shultz S Atkinson QD Currie T Mace R. 2014 Phylogenetic reconstruction of Bantu kinship challenges main sequence theory of human social evolution. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111 17 414-17 419. (doi:10.1073/pnas.1415744111) · DOI
- 10.1525/aa.1957.59.4.02a00090 · DOI
- White DR, 1986, Ethnographic bibliography of the standard cross-cultural sample, World Cultures, 2, 1
- Krippendorff K, 2018, Content analysis: an introduction to its methodology
- Holton J, 2016, Classic grounded theory: applications with qualitative and quantitative data
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0158391 · DOI
- 10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[2248:ESORWD]2.0.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1890/02-5078 · DOI
- 10.1111/ecog.02445 · DOI
- Neath AA, 1997, On the efficacy of Bayesian inference for nonidentifiable models, Am. Stat., 51, 225, 10.1080/00031305.1997.10473967 · DOI
- 10.1017/S0266466698144043 · DOI
- 10.1080/00031305.2013.778787 · DOI
- 10.3758/s13423-017-1272-1 · DOI
- 10.1214/06-BA116 · DOI
- R Core Team, 2018, R: A language and environment for statistical computing
- Murdock GP, 1967, Ethnographic atlas
- 10.1198/016214505000000105 · DOI
- Herlihy LH, 2007, Matrifocality and women's power on the Miskito coast, Ethnology, 46, 133
- Helms MW, 1971, Asang: adaptations to culture contact in a Miskito community
- Silverblatt IM, 1987, Moon, sun, and witches: gender ideologies and class in Inca and colonial Peru, 10.1515/9781400843343 · DOI
- Stearns ML, 1981, Haida culture in custody: The Masset Band
- Blackman MB, 1990, Handbook of North American Indians. Northwest, 240
- Blackman MB, 1977, Ethnohistoric changes in the Haida Potlatch complex, Arctic Anthropology, 14, 39
- 10.1098/rstb.2018.0077 · DOI
Cited by
Guyon, L., Guez, J., Toupance, B., Heyer, E., & Chaix, R. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-47618-5 · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- Shenk, M. K., Begley, R. O., Nolin, D. A., & Swiatek, A.
- Venue
- Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
- Publisher
- The Royal Society
- Published
- 2019-07-15
- Volume
- 374
- Issue
- 1780
- Pages
- 20190006
- ISSN
- 0962-8436
- 1471-2970
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: When does matriliny fail? The frequencies and causes of transitions to and from matriliny estimated from a de novo coding of a cross-cultural sample. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1098/rstb.2019.0006
- The paper
- Shenk, M. K., Begley, R. O., Nolin, D. A., & Swiatek, A. (2019). When does matriliny fail? The frequencies and causes of transitions to and from matriliny estimated from a de novo coding of a cross-cultural sample. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2019.0006