Standard cross-cultural sample
Open accessAbstract
The Standard Cross-Cultural Sample contains the best-described society in each of 186 cultural provinces of the world, chosen so that cultural independence of each unit in terms of historical origin and cultural diffusion could be considered maximal with respect to the others societies in the sample. Often the time period chosen is that of the earliest high quality ethnographic description. Hence the SCCS is primarily a sample of preindustrial societies. The original paper, published in the journal Ethnology in 1969, presented the first research results of the Cross-Cultural Cumulative Coding Center (CCCCC), a unit established in 1968 by Murdock and White at the University of Pittsburgh, with support from the National Science Foundation. The center was organized to offer to scholars a representative sample of the world's known and well described cultures, each pinpointed to the smallest identifiable subgroup of the society in question at a specific point in time, and to provide the first set of coded data for the sample. The sample selected by Murdock and White has the advantages of providing a sample size sufficiently large to test multivariate hypotheses but sufficiently small to allow complete coding by different authors; one with pinpointing of dates and focal groups and with a rich ethnographic bibliography and multiple data quality ratings that facilitate cumulative coding of comparative data on a wide variety of topics. Although the SCCS maximizes the relative independence of sample cases, the 1969 article also provides standard Galton's problem controls for historical nonindependence of cases, and demonstrates with illustrations of their use that Galton’s problem controls are needed to make valid statistical inferences even with a relatively large cross-cultural sample. This cautionary scientific result has not been properly emphasized by the Human Relations Area Files, with which the SCCS has no 1 This paper is reprinted in modified form with permission of the journal editorial office as published in Ethnology 8:329-369. Page breaks are identified as per original article. Footnotes were added in 2002 by DRW to provide additional information, and links to the on-line dataset at http://eclectic.ss.uci.edu/~drwhite/worldcul/Sccs34.htm provide the list of societies in Table 1 and data on these societies Appendix A (go there). One page and several references mistakenly omitted in earlier on-line editions of this update have been restore in this addition, and the abstract has been added. connection other than the fact that for some SCCS societies, but not all, there exist partial ethnographic materials housed by HRAF. The SCCS has served as a basis for a cumulative series of data coded by diverse authors in hundreds of publications on many different types of societal characteristics. Cumulative ethnographic codes and codebooks are published in the World Cultures electronic journal, which adds the geographical coordinates and computerizing mapping through SPSS and the journal's MAPTAB program, written by Douglas R. White. The SCCS and its SPSS database and codebooks currently contain more than 2,000 variables contributed by nearly a hundred different studies and as many authors. These variables include those of Murdock’s Ethnographic Atlas in a form most useful for testing hypotheses because they are collated with the standard sample societies. The design, contributor and topics, and some of the major results of studies using the SCCS are reviewed by D. R. White, Standard Cross-Cultural Sample. International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, 2nd edition, 2008. New York:
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The Standard Cross-Cultural Sample consists of 186 worldwide cultural populations, many of which are small-scale aboriginal societies.
“The Standard Cross-Cultural Sample (SCCS) consists of 186 worldwide cultural populations, many of which are small-scale aboriginal societies.”
From Pathogens and Politics: Further Evidence That Parasite Prevalence Predicts Authoritarianism (2013) · cites this paper as [34]
Cites
The Method of Multiple Working Hypotheses
Chamberlin, T. C. (1965) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.148.3671.754 · Cited by 1,080 · see citing works
Murdock, G. P. (1967) · Ethnology · doi:10.2307/3772751 · Cited by 933 · see citing works
Self-citationTylor, E. B. (1889) · The Journal of the Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland · doi:10.2307/2842423 · Cited by 558 · see citing works
Murdock, G. P. (1957) · American Anthropologist · doi:10.1525/aa.1957.59.4.02a00090 · Cited by 409 · see citing works
Self-citationMurdock, G. P. (1983) · Cited by 362 · see citing works
Self-citationOrtiz, S., & Textor, R. B. (1968) · Man · doi:10.2307/2798609 · Cited by 261 · see citing works
Two Solutions to Galton's Problem
Naroll, R. S. (1961) · Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1086/287778 · Cited by 234 · see citing works
The Proposed HRAF Probability Sample
Naroll, R. S. (1967) · Behavior Science Notes · doi:10.1177/106939716700200202 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Cultural Dimensions: A Factor Analysis of the World Ethnographic Sample1
Sawyer, J., & Levine, R. A. (1966) · American Anthropologist · doi:10.1525/aa.1966.68.3.02a00060 · Cited by 77 · see citing works
Murdock, G. P. (1968) · Ethnology · doi:10.2307/3772896 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
Self-citationA F ifth S olution to G alton's P roblem 1
Naroll, R. S. (1964) · American Anthropologist · doi:10.1525/aa.1964.66.4.02a00090 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
Two Further Solutions to Galton's Problem1
Naroll, R. S., & D’Andrade, R. G. (1963) · American Anthropologist · doi:10.1525/aa.1963.65.5.02a00050 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Regional and Worldwide Variations in Culture
Barry, H. (1968) · Ethnology · doi:10.2307/3772748 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Societal Research Archives System : Retrieval, quality control and analysis of comparative data
White, D. R. (1968) · Social Science Information · doi:10.1177/053901846800700306 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hunter-gatherers and human evolution.
Marlowe, F. W. (2005) · Evolutionary Anthropology: Issues, News, and Reviews · doi:10.1002/evan.20046 · Cited by 944 · see citing works
A Cross-Cultural Perspective on Romantic Love
Jankowiak, W. R., & Fischer, E. F. (1992) · Ethnology · doi:10.2307/3773618 · Cited by 646 · see citing works
Fincher, C. L., & Thornhill, R. (2012) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x11000021 · Cited by 526 · see citing works
Pathogen prevalence and human mate preferences
Gangestad, S. W., & Buss, D. M. (1993) · Ethology and Sociobiology · doi:10.1016/0162-3095(93)90009-7 · Cited by 521 · see citing works
McKay, R. T., & Dennett, D. C. (2009) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x09990975 · Cited by 474 · see citing works
Murray, D. R., & Schaller, M. (2010) · Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology · doi:10.1177/0022022109349510 · Cited by 446 · see citing works
McKay, R., & Whitehouse, H. (2015) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0038455 · Cited by 353 · see citing works
Brain Size, Cranial Morphology, Climate, and Time Machines [and Comments and Reply]
Beals, K. L., Smith, C. L., Dodd, S. M., Angel, J. L., Armstrong, E., Blumenberg, B., Girgis, F. G., Turkel, S., Gibson, K. R., Henneberg, M., et al. (1984) · Current Anthropology · doi:10.1086/203138 · Cited by 332 · see citing works
Johnson, D. D. P. (2005) · Human Nature · doi:10.1007/s12110-005-1017-0 · Cited by 323 · see citing works
Demography and childcare in preindustrial societies
Hewlett, B. S. (1991) · Journal of Anthropological Research · doi:10.1086/jar.47.1.3630579 · Cited by 216 · see citing works
Fincher, C. L., & Thornhill, R. (2008) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2008.0688 · Cited by 199 · see citing works
Pathogens and Politics: Further Evidence That Parasite Prevalence Predicts Authoritarianism
Murray, D. R., Schaller, M., & Suedfeld, P. (2013) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0062275 · Cited by 182 · see citing works
Group morality and intergroup relations: Cross-cultural and experimental evidence
Cohen, T. R., Montoya, R. M., & Insko, C. A. (2006) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167206291673 · Cited by 163 · see citing works
WINKELMAN, M. J. (1990) · Ethos · doi:10.1525/eth.1990.18.3.02a00040 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
Schacht, R., & Kramer, K. L. (2019) · Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution · doi:10.3389/fevo.2019.00230 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
Pathogen Prevalence, Group Bias, and Collectivism in the Standard Cross-Cultural Sample
Cashdan, E., & Steele, M. (2013) · Human Nature · doi:10.1007/s12110-012-9159-3 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
Eastwick, P. W. (2009) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0016845 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Neuroenhancement of love and marriage: the chemicals between us.
Savulescu, J., & Sandberg, A. (2008) · Neuroethics · doi:10.1007/s12152-007-9002-4 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Corporate Scandals and Regulation
HAIL, L., TAHOUN, A., & WANG, C. (2018) · Journal of Accounting Research · doi:10.1111/1475-679x.12201 · Cited by 111 · see citing works
Ecological influences on human behavioural diversity: a review of recent findings
Nettle, D. (2009) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2009.05.013 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Letendre, K., Fincher, C. L., & Thornhill, R. (2010) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1469-185x.2010.00133.x · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Cultural comparison research designs in food, eating, and nutrition
Sobal, J. (1998) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/s0950-3293(98)00029-9 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Starvation and famine: Cross-cultural codes and some hypothesis tests
Dirks, R. (1993) · Cross-Cultural Research · doi:10.1177/106939719302700103 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
An Ethnological Analogy and Biogenetic Model for Interpretation of Religion and Ritual in the Past
Winkelman, M. J. (2022) · Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory · doi:10.1007/s10816-021-09523-9 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
“1 was screened against the SCCS Social Complexity variables (CosSci v149-v158, Murdock & Provost, 1973), with the variables with significant correlations entered into an autocorrelation multiple regression analysis.”
MethodInfluentialRobust evidence that mobile hunter-gatherers participated in war: Comment on Fry (2025)
Glowacki, L. (2025) · Evolution and Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2025.106658 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
- Authors
- Murdock, G. P., & White, D. R.
- Venue
- Ethnology
- Publisher
- JSTOR
- Published
- 1969-10
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 329
- ISSN
- 0014-1828 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W96167583
- Cited by
- 1,149
- References
- 14
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 55 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 53 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 40 · 2016: 57 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 35 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 26
- FWCI
- 73.79
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Locations
- Ethnology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Anthropology › Cross-Cultural and Social Analysis
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
- Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Language and cultural evolution
- Keywords
- Standard Cross-Cultural Sample, cross-cultural comparison, pre-industrial societies, cultural province, Galton's problem, cultural independence, Human Relations Area Files, multivariate hypothesis testing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review