Cited by 1,149Cross-Cultural and Social AnalysisCultural Differences and ValuesLanguage and cultural evolution

Standard cross-cultural sample

Open access
Murdock, George P., White, Douglas R.·1969·Ethnology

Abstract

The Standard Cross-Cultural Sample contains the best-described society in each of 186 cultural provinces of the world, chosen so that cultural independence of each unit in terms of historical origin and cultural diffusion could be considered maximal with respect to the others societies in the sample. Often the time period chosen is that of the earliest high quality ethnographic description. Hence the SCCS is primarily a sample of preindustrial societies. The original paper, published in the journal Ethnology in 1969, presented the first research results of the Cross-Cultural Cumulative Coding Center (CCCCC), a unit established in 1968 by Murdock and White at the University of Pittsburgh, with support from the National Science Foundation. The center was organized to offer to scholars a representative sample of the world's known and well described cultures, each pinpointed to the smallest identifiable subgroup of the society in question at a specific point in time, and to provide the first set of coded data for the sample. The sample selected by Murdock and White has the advantages of providing a sample size sufficiently large to test multivariate hypotheses but sufficiently small to allow complete coding by different authors; one with pinpointing of dates and focal groups and with a rich ethnographic bibliography and multiple data quality ratings that facilitate cumulative coding of comparative data on a wide variety of topics. Although the SCCS maximizes the relative independence of sample cases, the 1969 article also provides standard Galton's problem controls for historical nonindependence of cases, and demonstrates with illustrations of their use that Galton’s problem controls are needed to make valid statistical inferences even with a relatively large cross-cultural sample. This cautionary scientific result has not been properly emphasized by the Human Relations Area Files, with which the SCCS has no 1 This paper is reprinted in modified form with permission of the journal editorial office as published in Ethnology 8:329-369. Page breaks are identified as per original article. Footnotes were added in 2002 by DRW to provide additional information, and links to the on-line dataset at http://eclectic.ss.uci.edu/~drwhite/worldcul/Sccs34.htm provide the list of societies in Table 1 and data on these societies Appendix A (go there). One page and several references mistakenly omitted in earlier on-line editions of this update have been restore in this addition, and the abstract has been added. connection other than the fact that for some SCCS societies, but not all, there exist partial ethnographic materials housed by HRAF. The SCCS has served as a basis for a cumulative series of data coded by diverse authors in hundreds of publications on many different types of societal characteristics. Cumulative ethnographic codes and codebooks are published in the World Cultures electronic journal, which adds the geographical coordinates and computerizing mapping through SPSS and the journal's MAPTAB program, written by Douglas R. White. The SCCS and its SPSS database and codebooks currently contain more than 2,000 variables contributed by nearly a hundred different studies and as many authors. These variables include those of Murdock’s Ethnographic Atlas in a form most useful for testing hypotheses because they are collated with the standard sample societies. The design, contributor and topics, and some of the major results of studies using the SCCS are reviewed by D. R. White, Standard Cross-Cultural Sample. International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, 2nd edition, 2008. New York:

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/3772907

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Murdock, G. P., & White, D. R.
Venue
Ethnology
Publisher
JSTOR
Published
1969-10
Volume
8
Issue
4
Pages
329
ISSN
0014-1828 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W96167583
Cited by
1,149
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 55 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 53 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 40 · 2016: 57 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 35 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 26
FWCI
73.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Ethnology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Anthropology › Cross-Cultural and Social Analysis
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Language and cultural evolution
Keywords
Standard Cross-Cultural Sample, cross-cultural comparison, pre-industrial societies, cultural province, Galton's problem, cultural independence, Human Relations Area Files, multivariate hypothesis testing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review