Cited by 105Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorAnimal Behavior and ReproductionStress Responses and Cortisol

Behavioural and physiological plasticity in social hierarchies

Open access
Milewski, T. M., Lee, W., Champagne, F. A., Curley, J. P.·2022·Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B

Abstract

Individuals occupying dominant and subordinate positions in social hierarchies exhibit divergent behaviours, physiology and neural functioning. Dominant animals express higher levels of dominance behaviours such as aggression, territorial defence and mate-guarding. Dominants also signal their status via auditory, visual or chemical cues. Moreover, dominant animals typically increase reproductive behaviours and show enhanced spatial and social cognition as well as elevated arousal. These biobehavioural changes increase energetic demands that are met via shifting both energy intake and metabolism and are supported by coordinated changes in physiological systems including the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal and hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axes as well as altered gene expression and sensitivity of neural circuits that regulate these behaviours. Conversely, subordinate animals inhibit dominance and often reproductive behaviours and exhibit physiological changes adapted to socially stressful contexts. Phenotypic changes in both dominant and subordinate individuals may be beneficial in the short-term but lead to long-term challenges to health. Further, rapid changes in social ranks occur as dominant animals socially ascend or descend and are associated with dynamic modulations in the brain and periphery. In this paper, we provide a broad overview of how behavioural and phenotypic changes associated with social dominance and subordination are expressed in neural and physiological p…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rstb.2020.0443

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Milewski, T. M., Lee, W., Champagne, F. A., & Curley, J. P.
Affiliations
The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Corresponding author
Curley, J. P.
Venue
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
Published
2022-01-10
Volume
377
Issue
1845
Pages
20200443-20200443
ISSN
  • 0962-8436 (ISSN-L)
  • 1471-2970
OpenAlex
W4206229874
Cited by
105
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 15
FWCI
17.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
Keywords
social dominance, social hierarchy, dominance behavior, subordination, behavioral plasticity, physiological plasticity, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal axis, social stress, aggression, reproductive behavior, social cognition, energy metabolism, gene expression
MeSH terms
Aggression, Animals, Hierarchy, Social, Reproduction, Social Dominance, Territoriality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review