Cited by 23Animal Behavior and Welfare StudiesWildlife Ecology and ConservationAnimal Behavior and Reproduction

Physiological plasticity in elephants: highly dynamic glucocorticoids in African and Asian elephants

Open access
Pokharel, Sanjeeta Sharma, Brown, Janine L·2023·Conservation Physiology

Abstract

Slowly reproducing and long-lived terrestrial mammals are often more at risk from challenges that influence fitness and survival. It is, therefore, important to understand how animals cope with such challenges and how coping mechanisms translate over generations and affect phenotypic plasticity. Rapidly escalating anthropogenic challenges may further diminish an animal's ability to reinstate homeostasis. Research to advance insights on elephant stress physiology has predominantly focused on relative or comparative analyses of a major stress response marker, glucocorticoids (GCs), across different ecological, anthropogenic, and reproductive contexts. This paper presents an extensive review of published findings on Asian and African elephants from 1980 to 2023 (May) and reveals that stress responses, as measured by alterations in GCs in different sample matrices, often are highly dynamic and vary within and across individuals exposed to similar stimuli, and not always in a predictable fashion. Such dynamicity in physiological reactivity may be mediated by individual differences in personality traits or coping styles, ecological conditions, and technical factors that often are not considered in study designs. We describe probable causations under the 'Physiological Dynamicity Model', which considers context-experience-individuality effects. Highly variable adrenal responses may affect physiological plasticity with potential fitness and survival consequences. This review also addresses the significance of cautious interpretations of GCs data in the context of normal adaptive stress versus distress. We emphasize the need for long-term assessments of GCs that incorporate multiple markers of 'stress' and 'well-being' to decipher the probable fitness consequences of highly dynamic physiological adrenal responses in elephants. Ultimately, we propose that assessing GC responses to current and future challenges is one of the most valuable and informative conservation tools we have for guiding conservation strategies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/conphys/coad088

Cites

282 of 282 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Introductions of new individuals can be stressful, and glucocorticoid concentrations are commonly used as stress indicators for welfare management.

    “Introductions of new individuals can be stressful; therefore, glucocorticoid concentrations are commonly used as stress indicators for welfare management [34].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. PA, Becker PR (2000) Review of stress in marine mammals. J Aquat Ecosyst Stress Recover 7: 335-354. https://doi.org/10.1023/ A:1009968113079. · DOI
  2. Mason G (2006) Stereotypic animal behaviour: fundamentals and applica- tions to welfare. Cabi publishing, Wallingford UK pp. 325-356
  3. Romero LM, Wingfield JC (2015) Tempests, poxes, predators, and people: Stress in wild animals and how they cope. Tempests, poxes, predators, and people. Oxford Univeristy Press, New York
  4. Wild D (2013) The immunoassay handbook: theory and applications of ligand binding, ELISA and related techniques. Elsevier, Newnes.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pokharel, S. S., & Brown, J. L.
Affiliations
Smithsonian Institution (US)
Venue
Conservation Physiology
Published
2023-01-01
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
coad088-coad088
ISSN
2051-1434 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4388989883
Cited by
23
References
282
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 5
FWCI
7.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Conservation Physiology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Shared Earth Foundation, Friends of the National Zoo, Anela Kolohe Foundation, Smithsonian Women’s Committee, Smithsonian Scholarly Studies Program
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
Keywords
elephants, glucocorticoids, stress physiology, physiological plasticity, Loxodonta africana, Asian elephant, individual differences, coping styles, adrenal response, well-being, conservation, long-lived mammals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review