The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Phylogeny of Campylobacters, Wolinellas, Bacteroides gracilis, and Bacteroides ureolyticus by 16S Ribosomal Ribonucleic Acid Sequencing
Abstract
Partial 16S ribosomal ribonucleic acid sequences were determined for Campylobacter concisus, Campylobacter fetus subsp. intestinalis, Campylobacter sputorum subsp. bubulus, Wolinella curva, Wolinella recta, Wolinella succinogenes, Bacteroides gracilis, and Bacteroides ureolyticus. These sequences were compared with previously published sequences of Campylobacter laridis, Campylobacter jejuni, Campylobacter coli, Campylobacter pylori, Thiovulum sp., Escherichia coli, and Bacteroides fragilis, and percentages of homology were calculated. With the exception of C. pylori, all of the campylobacters formed a tight phylogenetic cluster. Within this cluster were the following organisms that have been classified as species of Wolinella and Bacteroides: W. curva, W. recta, B. gracilis, and B. ureolyticus. The average level of interspecies homology within this group was 94.4%. W. succinogenes and C. pylori formed a second cluster with a level of interspecies homology of 90.4%. The average level of homology of the W. succinogenes-C. pylori cluster with species of the campylobacter cluster was 85.1%. Thiovulum sp. was only 83% homologous with either of the two clusters. Based upon the sequence data, we suggest that all members of the campylobacter cluster should be placed in the genus Campylobacter. However, formal resolution of the taxonomic status of the campylobacter cluster may require additional information provided by other experimental methods.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Evolution of Protein Molecules
JUKES, T. H., & CANTOR, C. R. (1969) · Mammalian Protein Metabolism · doi:10.1016/b978-1-4832-3211-9.50009-7 · Cited by 11,032
Cited by
Dewhirst, F. E., Chen, T., Izard, J., Paster, B. J., Tanner, A. C. R., Yu, W.-H., Lakshmanan, A., & Wade, W. G. (2010) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.00542-10 · Cited by 3,352
Self-citationChen, T., Yu, W.-H., Izard, J., Baranova, O. V., Lakshmanan, A., & Dewhirst, F. E. (2010) · Database · doi:10.1093/database/baq013 · Cited by 1,162
“Briefly, sequences were manually aligned in a secondary structure-based database using the program RNA (19).”
MethodBacteremia Associated With Toothbrushing and Dental Extraction
Lockhart, P. B., Brennan, M. T., Sasser, H. C., Fox, P. C., Paster, B. J., & Bahrani-Mougeot, F. K. (2008) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/circulationaha.107.758524 · Cited by 851
Self-citationVANDAMME, P., FALSEN, E., ROSSAU, R., HOSTE, B., SEGERS, P., TYTGAT, R., & DE LEY, J. (1991) · International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology · doi:10.1099/00207713-41-1-88 · Cited by 697
Molecular Analysis of Bacterial Species Associated with Childhood Caries
Becker, M. R., Paster, B. J., Leys, E. J., Moeschberger, M. L., Kenyon, S. G., Galvin, J. L., Boches, S. K., Dewhirst, F. E., & Griffen, A. L. (2002) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.40.3.1001-1009.2002 · Cited by 546
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- PASTER, B. J., & DEWHIRST, F. E.
- Venue
- International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology
- Publisher
- Microbiology Society
- Published
- 1988-01-01
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 56-62
- ISSN
- 0020-7713 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-2102
- OpenAlex
- W2148795079
- Cited by
- 212
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 26.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Phylogeny of Campylobacters, Wolinellas, Bacteroides gracilis, and Bacteroides ureolyticus by 16S Ribosomal Ribonucleic Acid Sequencing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1099/00207713-38-1-56
- The paper
- PASTER, B. J., & DEWHIRST, F. E. (1988). Phylogeny of Campylobacters, Wolinellas, Bacteroides gracilis, and Bacteroides ureolyticus by 16S Ribosomal Ribonucleic Acid Sequencing. International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology. https://doi.org/10.1099/00207713-38-1-56
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
