The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Transfer of Bacteroides succinogenes (Hungate) to Fibrobacter gen. nov. as Fibrobacter succinogenes comb. nov. and Description of Fibrobacter intestinalis sp. nov.
Abstract
A comparison of 16S ribosomal ribonucleic acid sequences showed that strains classified as Bacteroides succinogenes are not closely related to other species of Bacteroides, including the type species, Bacteroides fragilis. Flavobacterium heparinum, for example, is more closely related to B. fragilis than B. succinogenes is. Therefore, we propose that B. succinogenes strains be renamed as members of a new genus, Fibrobacter. An analysis of 16S ribosomal ribonucleic acid sequence data revealed that there are two species within this new genus. Isolates from rumina are placed in Fibrobacter succinogenes; the type strain is strain S85 (= ATCC 19169). Isolates from ceca of nonruminant animals are placed in Fibrobacter intestinalis; the type strain is strain NR9 (= ATCC 43854). Members of Fibrobacter succinogenes can be differentiated from Fibrobacter intestinalis by their requirement for biotin; the site of isolation may not be diagnostic. Fibrobacter succinogenes consists of two subspecies; the cells of Fibrobacter succinogenes subsp. succinogenes strains are broad rods that are often pleomorphic and coccoid (type strain, S85), whereas cells of Fibrobacter succinogenes subsp. elongata are slender rods (type strain, HM2 [= ATCC 43856]).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Microbial Cellulose Utilization: Fundamentals and Biotechnology
Lynd, L. R., Weimer, P. J., van Zyl, W. H., & Pretorius, I. S. (2002) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.66.3.506-577.2002 · Cited by 4,726
Stewart, C. S., Flint, H. J., & Bryant, M. P. (1997) · The Rumen Microbial Ecosystem · doi:10.1007/978-94-009-1453-7_2 · Cited by 772
Starch Hydrolysis by the Ruminal Microflora ,
Kotarski, S. F., KWaniska, R. D., & Thurn, K. K. (1992) · The Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1093/jn/122.1.178 · Cited by 248
Svartström, O., Alneberg, J., Terrapon, N., Lombard, V., de Bruijn, I., Malmsten, J., Dalin, A.-M., EL Muller, E., Shah, P., Wilmes, P., et al. (2017) · The ISME Journal · doi:10.1038/ismej.2017.108 · Cited by 161
Metadata
- Authors
- MONTGOMERY, L., FLESHER, B., & STAHL, D.
- Venue
- International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology
- Publisher
- Microbiology Society
- Published
- 1988-10-01
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 430-435
- ISSN
- 0020-7713 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-2102
- OpenAlex
- W2009761291
- Cited by
- 168
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 3.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Transfer of Bacteroides succinogenes (Hungate) to Fibrobacter gen. nov. as Fibrobacter succinogenes comb. nov. and Description of Fibrobacter intestinalis sp. nov. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1099/00207713-38-4-430
- The paper
- MONTGOMERY, L., FLESHER, B., & STAHL, D. (1988). Transfer of Bacteroides succinogenes (Hungate) to Fibrobacter gen. nov. as Fibrobacter succinogenes comb. nov. and Description of Fibrobacter intestinalis sp. nov. International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology. https://doi.org/10.1099/00207713-38-4-430
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.