The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Distribution and in-vitro transfer of tetracycline resistance determinants in clinical and aquatic Acinetobacter strains
Abstract
Following characterisation by phenotypic tests and amplified ribosomal DNA restriction analysis (ARDRA), 50 tetracycline-resistant (MIC > or = 16 mg/L) Acinetobacter strains from clinical (n = 35) and aquatic (n = 15) samples were analysed by PCR for tetracycline resistance (Tet) determinants of classes A-E. All the clinical strains were A. baumannii; most (33 of 35) had Tet A (n = 16) or B (n = 17) determinants, and only two did not yield amplicons with primers for any of the five tetracycline resistance determinants. The aquatic strains belonged to genomic species other than A. baumannii, and most (12 of 15) did not contain determinants Tet A-E. Strains negative for Tet A-E were also negative for Tet G and M; further analysis of two aquatic strains with specific primers for Tet O and Tet Y and degenerate primers for Tet M-S-O-P(B)-Q also showed negative results. Transfer of tetracycline resistance was tested for 20 strains with three aquatic Acinetobacter strains and Escherichia coli K-12 as recipients. Transfer of resistance was demonstrated between aquatic strains from distinct ecological niches, but not from clinical to aquatic strains, nor from any Acinetobacter strain to E. coli K-12. Most transconjugants acquired multiple relatively small plasmids (<36 kb). Transfer did not occur when DNA from the donor strains was added to the recipient cultures and was not affected by deoxyribonuclease I, suggesting a conjugative mechanism. It is concluded that Tet A and B are widespread among tetracycline-resistant A. baumannii strains of clinical origin, but unknown genetic determinants are responsible for most tetracycline resistance among aquatic Acinetobacter spp. These differences, together with the inability of clinical strains to transfer tetracycline resistance in vitro to aquatic strains, contra-indicate any important flow of tetracycline resistance genes between clinical and aquatic acinetobacter populations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Acinetobacter baumannii : Emergence of a Successful Pathogen
Peleg, A. Y., Seifert, H., & Paterson, D. L. (2008) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00058-07 · Cited by 3,316
Efflux-mediated antimicrobial resistance
Poole, K. (2005) · Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy · doi:10.1093/jac/dki171 · Cited by 1,082
Kummerer, K. (2004) · Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy · doi:10.1093/jac/dkh325 · Cited by 935
Dodd, M. C. (2012) · Journal of Environmental Monitoring · doi:10.1039/c2em00006g · Cited by 462
Solubility of Antimony and Other Elements in Samples Taken from Shooting Ranges
Johnson, C. A., Moench, H., Wersin, P., Kugler, P., & Wenger, C. (2005) · Journal of Environmental Quality · doi:10.2134/jeq2005.0248 · Cited by 357
Metadata
- Authors
- GUARDABASSI, L., DIJKSHOORN, L., COLLARD, J.-M., OLSEN, J. E., & DALSGAARD, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Medical Microbiology
- Publisher
- Microbiology Society
- Published
- 2000-10-01
- Volume
- 49
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 929-936
- ISSN
- 0022-2615 (ISSN-L)
- 1473-5644
- OpenAlex
- W2124004909
- Cited by
- 189
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Distribution and in-vitro transfer of tetracycline resistance determinants in clinical and aquatic Acinetobacter strains. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1099/0022-1317-49-10-929
- The paper
- GUARDABASSI, L., DIJKSHOORN, L., COLLARD, J.-M., OLSEN, J. E., & DALSGAARD, A. (2000). Distribution and in-vitro transfer of tetracycline resistance determinants in clinical and aquatic Acinetobacter strains. Journal of Medical Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1099/0022-1317-49-10-929
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.