The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Plasmid transfer in the animal intestine and other dynamic bacterial populations: the role of community structure and environment
Abstract
The transfer of the R1drd19 plasmid between isogenic strains of Escherichia coli BJ4 in batch cultures of laboratory media and intestinal extracts was compared. Using an estimate of plasmid transfer rate that is independent of cell density, of donor:recipient ratios and of mating time, it was found that transfer occurs at a much lower rate in intestinal extracts than in laboratory media. Furthermore, the results suggest that the majority of intestinal plasmid transfer takes place in the viscous mucus layer covering the epithelial cells. Investigation of plasmid transfer in different flow systems harbouring a dynamic, continuously growing population of constant size showed that transfer kinetics were strongly influenced by bacterial biofilm formation. When donor and recipient populations were subjected to continuous mixing, as in a chemostat, transfer continued to occur at a constant rate. When donor and recipient populations retained fixed spatial locations, as in a biofilm, transfer occurred very rapidly in the initial phase, after which no further transfer was detected. From in vivo studies of plasmid transfer in the intestine of streptomycin-treated mice, results were obtained which were similar to those obtained in the biofilm, but differed markedly from those obtained in the chemostat. In spite of peristaltic movements in the gut, and of apparently even distribution of E. coli as single cells in the intestinal mucus, the intestinal environment displays transfer kinetics different from those expected of a mixed, liquid culture, but quite similar to those of a biofilm.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Dental biofilms: difficult therapeutic targets
SOCRANSKY, S. S., & HAFFAJEE, A. D. (2002) · Periodontology 2000 · doi:10.1034/j.1600-0757.2002.280102.x · Cited by 1,273
Stecher, B., Denzler, R., Maier, L., Bernet, F., Sanders, M. J., Pickard, D. J., Barthel, M., Westendorf, A. M., Krogfelt, K. A., Walker, A. W., et al. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1113246109 · Cited by 492
Self-citationBiofilms in the large bowel suggest an apparent function of the human vermiform appendix
Randal Bollinger, R., Barbas, A. S., Bush, E. L., Lin, S. S., & Parker, W. (2007) · Journal of Theoretical Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2007.08.032 · Cited by 373
Bowel Biofilms: Tipping Points between a Healthy and Compromised Gut?
Tytgat, H. L. P., Nobrega, F. L., van der Oost, J., & de Vos, W. M. (2019) · Trends in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.tim.2018.08.009 · Cited by 144
Models for Gut-Mediated Horizontal Gene Transfer by Bacterial Plasmid Conjugation
Ott, L. C., & Mellata, M. (2022) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2022.891548 · Cited by 32
Metadata
- Authors
- Licht, T. R., Christensen, B. B., Krogfelt, K. A., & Molin, S.
- Venue
- Microbiology
- Publisher
- Microbiology Society
- Published
- 1999-09-01
- Volume
- 145
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 2615-2622
- ISSN
- 1350-0872 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-2080
- OpenAlex
- W2102001744
- Cited by
- 167
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Plasmid transfer in the animal intestine and other dynamic bacterial populations: the role of community structure and environment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1099/00221287-145-9-2615
- The paper
- Licht, T. R., Christensen, B. B., Krogfelt, K. A., & Molin, S. (1999). Plasmid transfer in the animal intestine and other dynamic bacterial populations: the role of community structure and environment. Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1099/00221287-145-9-2615
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.