The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Individual-based modelling of biofilms
Open accessAbstract
Understanding the emergence of the complex organization of biofilms from the interactions of its parts, individual cells and their environment, is the aim of the individual-based modelling (IbM) approach. This IbM is version 2 of BacSim, a model of Escherichia coli colony growth, which was developed into a two-dimensional multi-substrate, multi-species model of nitrifying biofilms. It was compared with the established biomass-based model (BbM) of Picioreanu and others. Both models assume that biofilm growth is due to the processes of diffusion, reaction and growth (including biomass growth, division and spreading). In the IbM, each bacterium was a spherical cell in continuous space and had variable growth parameters. Spreading of biomass occurred by shoving of cells to minimize overlap between cells. In the BbM, biomass was distributed in a discrete grid and each species had uniform growth parameters. Spreading of biomass occurred by cellular automata rules. In the IbM, the effect of random variation of growth parameters of individual bacteria was negligible in contrast to the E. coli colony model, because the heterogeneity of substrate concentrations in the biofilm was more important. The growth of a single cell into a clone, and therefore also the growth of the less abundant species, depended on the randomly chosen site of attachment, owing to the heterogeneity of substrate concentrations in the biofilm. The IbM agreed with the BbM regarding the overall growth of the biofilm, due to the same diffusion-reaction processes. However, the biofilm shape was different due to the different biomass spreading mechanisms. The IbM biofilm was more confluent and rounded due to the steady, deterministic and directionally unconstrained spreading of the bacteria. Since the biofilm shape is influenced by the spreading mechanism, it is partially independent of growth, which is driven by diffusion-reaction. Chance in initial attachment events modifies the biofilm shape and the growth of single cells because of the high heterogeneity of substrate concentrations in the biofilm, which again results from the interaction of diffusion-reaction with spreading. This stresses the primary importance of spreading and chance in addition to diffusion-reaction in the emergence of the complexity of the biofilm community.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Textural Features for Image Classification
Haralick, R. M., Shanmugam, K., & Dinstein, I. (1973) · IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/tsmc.1973.4309314 · Cited by 22,886
David, F. N., & Tukey, J. W. (1977) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2529486 · Cited by 12,708
Bergey's Manual of Determinative Bacteriology
S., F. A., Buchanan, R. E. T., Gibbons, N. E., & Bergey (1975) · Taxon · doi:10.2307/1218353 · Cited by 11,333
Costerton, J. W., Lewandowski, Z., Caldwell, D. E., Korber, D. R., & Lappin-Scott, H. M. (1995) · Annual Review of Microbiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.mi.49.100195.003431 · Cited by 4,544
The Numerical Solution of Parabolic and Elliptic Differential Equations
Peaceman, D. W., & Rachford, Jr. (1955) · Journal of the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics · doi:10.1137/0103003 · Cited by 3,255
Quantification of biofilm structures by the novel computer program comstat
Heydorn, A., Nielsen, A. T., Hentzer, M., Sternberg, C., Givskov, M., Ersbøll, B. K., & Molin, S. (2000) · Microbiology · doi:10.1099/00221287-146-10-2395 · Cited by 2,179
A Comparative Study of Texture Measures for Terrain Classification
Weszka, J. S., Dyer, C. R., & Rosenfeld, A. (1976) · IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics · doi:10.1109/tsmc.1976.5408777 · Cited by 1,522
Grimm, V. (1999) · Ecological Modelling · doi:10.1016/s0304-3800(98)00188-4 · Cited by 939
New Computer Models Unify Ecological Theory
Huston, M., DeAngelis, D., & Post, W. (1988) · BioScience · doi:10.2307/1310870 · Cited by 792
Biological nitrogen removal from wastewater
Wiesmann, U. (1994) · Advances in Biochemical Engineering/Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/bfb0008736 · Cited by 597
Cited by
Nadell, C. D., Xavier, J. B., & Foster, K. R. (2009) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1574-6976.2008.00150.x · Cited by 667
Xiong, Q., Baychev, T. G., & Jivkov, A. P. (2016) · Journal of Contaminant Hydrology · doi:10.1016/j.jconhyd.2016.07.002 · Cited by 606
The developmental model of microbial biofilms: ten years of a paradigm up for review
Monds, R. D., & O’Toole, G. A. (2009) · Trends in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.tim.2008.11.001 · Cited by 532
Cooperation and conflict in microbial biofilms
Xavier, J. B., & Foster, K. R. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0607651104 · Cited by 517
Biofilm-associated persistence of food-borne pathogens
Bridier, A., Sanchez-Vizuete, P., Guilbaud, M., Piard, J.-C., Naïtali, M., & Briandet, R. (2015) · Food Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.fm.2014.04.015 · Cited by 507
Metadata
- Authors
- Kreft, J.-U., Picioreanu, C., van Loosdrecht, M. C. M., & Wimpenny, J. W. T.
- Venue
- Microbiology
- Publisher
- Microbiology Society
- Published
- 2001-11-01
- Volume
- 147
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2897-2912
- ISSN
- 1350-0872 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-2080
- OpenAlex
- W2130281211
- Cited by
- 416
- References
- 28
- FWCI
- 3.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Individual-based modelling of biofilms. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1099/00221287-147-11-2897
- The paper
- Kreft, J.-U., Picioreanu, C., van Loosdrecht, M. C. M., & Wimpenny, J. W. T. (2001). Individual-based modelling of biofilms. Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1099/00221287-147-11-2897
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.