The DOI matches its Crossref record; 167 of the 167 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Biofilm-associated persistence of food-borne pathogens
Open accessAbstract
Microbial life abounds on surfaces in both natural and industrial environments, one of which is the food industry. A solid substrate, water and some nutrients are sufficient to allow the construction of a microbial fortress, a so-called biofilm. Survival strategies developed by these surface-associated ecosystems are beginning to be deciphered in the context of rudimentary laboratory biofilms. Gelatinous organic matrices consisting of complex mixtures of self-produced biopolymers ensure the cohesion of these biological structures and contribute to their resistance and persistence. Moreover, far from being just simple three-dimensional assemblies of identical cells, biofilms are composed of heterogeneous sub-populations with distinctive behaviours that contribute to their global ecological success. In the clinical field, biofilm-associated infections (BAI) are known to trigger chronic infections that require dedicated therapies. A similar belief emerging in the food industry, where biofilm tolerance to environmental stresses, including cleaning and disinfection/sanitation, can result in the persistence of bacterial pathogens and the recurrent cross-contamination of food products. The present review focuses on the principal mechanisms involved in the formation of biofilms of food-borne pathogens, where biofilm behaviour is driven by its three-dimensional heterogeneity and by species interactions within these biostructures, and we look at some emergent control strategies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
RETRACTED: A Self-Produced Trigger for Biofilm Disassembly that Targets Exopolysaccharide
Kolodkin-Gal, I., Cao, S., Chai, L., Böttcher, T., Kolter, R., Clardy, J., & Losick, R. (2012) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2012.02.055 · Cited by 159
RetractedFlemming, H.-C., & Wingender, J. (2010) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro2415 · Cited by 10,137
Stochastic Gene Expression in a Single Cell
Elowitz, M. B., Levine, A. J., Siggia, E. D., & Swain, P. S. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1070919 · Cited by 5,441
Biofilms: Microbial Life on Surfaces
Donlan, R. M. (2002) · Emerging Infectious Diseases · doi:10.3201/eid0809.020063 · Cited by 4,145
Mechanisms of biofilm resistance to antimicrobial agents
Mah, T.-F. C., & O'Toole, G. A. (2001) · Trends in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/s0966-842x(00)01913-2 · Cited by 3,921
Biofilms as Complex Differentiated Communities
Stoodley, P., Sauer, K., Davies, D. G., & Costerton, J. W. (2002) · Annual Review of Microbiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.micro.56.012302.160705 · Cited by 3,158
Microbial Biofilms: from Ecology to Molecular Genetics
Davey, M. E., & O'toole, G. A. (2000) · Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.64.4.847-867.2000 · Cited by 3,086
Understanding biofilm resistance to antibacterial agents
Davies, D. (2003) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd1008 · Cited by 2,781
Physiological heterogeneity in biofilms
Stewart, P. S., & Franklin, M. J. (2008) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro1838 · Cited by 2,327
Pseudomonas aeruginosa Displays Multiple Phenotypes during Development as a Biofilm
Sauer, K., Camper, A. K., Ehrlich, G. D., Costerton, J. W., & Davies, D. G. (2002) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.184.4.1140-1154.2002 · Cited by 1,691
Cited by
Biofilm formation and control strategies of foodborne pathogens: food safety perspectives
Zhao, X., Zhao, F., Wang, J., & Zhong, N. (2017) · RSC Advances · doi:10.1039/c7ra02497e · Cited by 283
Isothiocyanates: An Overview of Their Antimicrobial Activity against Human Infections
Romeo, L., Iori, R., Rollin, P., Bramanti, P., & Mazzon, E. (2018) · Molecules · doi:10.3390/molecules23030624 · Cited by 230
Hordenine: A Novel Quorum Sensing Inhibitor and Antibiofilm Agent against Pseudomonas aeruginosa
Zhou, J.-W., Luo, H.-Z., Jiang, H., Jian, T.-K., Chen, Z.-Q., & Jia, A.-Q. (2018) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.jafc.7b05035 · Cited by 206
Optimizing the production of the biosurfactant lichenysin and its application in biofilm control
Coronel-León, J., Marqués, A. M., Bastida, J., & Manresa, A. (2016) · Journal of Applied Microbiology · doi:10.1111/jam.12992 · Cited by 102
“Bridier et al. (2014) reviewed potential green strategies that include essential oils, bacteriophages, enzymes, biocides and biosurfactants (BS) to avoid biofilm formation.”
BackgroundInfluentialKomodromos, D., Kotzamanidis, C., Giantzi, V., Pappa, S., Papa, A., Zdragas, A., Angelidis, A., & Sergelidis, D. (2022) · Pathogens · doi:10.3390/pathogens11111370 · Cited by 12
Metadata
- Authors
- Bridier, A., Sanchez-Vizuete, P., Guilbaud, M., Piard, J.-C., Naïtali, M., & Briandet, R.
- Venue
- Food Microbiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-02
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- Pt B
- Pages
- 167-178
- ISSN
- 0740-0020 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1975240963
- Cited by
- 507
- References
- 167
- FWCI
- 11.68
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biofilm-associated persistence of food-borne pathogens. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.fm.2014.04.015
- The paper
- Bridier, A., Sanchez-Vizuete, P., Guilbaud, M., Piard, J.-C., Naïtali, M., & Briandet, R. (2015). Biofilm-associated persistence of food-borne pathogens. Food Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2014.04.015
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.