The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Extracellular phytase activity of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB45 contributes to its plant-growth-promoting effect a aThe GenBank accession numbers for the sequences determined in this work are AY055219 to AY055226.
Abstract
Several Bacillus strains belonging to the B. subtilis/amyloliquefaciens group isolated from plant-pathogen-infested soil possess plant-growth-promoting activity [Krebs, B. et al. (1998) J Plant Dis Prot 105, 181-197]. Three out of the four strains investigated were identified as B. amyloliquefaciens and were able to degrade extracellular phytate (myo-inositol hexakisphosphate). The highest extracellular phytase activity was detected in strain FZB45, and diluted culture filtrates of this strain stimulated growth of maize seedlings under phosphate limitation in the presence of phytate. The amino acid sequence deduced from the phytase phyA gene cloned from FZB45 displayed a high degree of similarity to known Bacillus phytases. Weak similarity between FZB45 phytase and B. subtilis alkaline phosphatase IV pointed to a possible common origin of these two enzymes. The recombinant protein expressed by B. subtilis MU331 displayed 3(1)-phytase activity yielding D/L-Ins(1,2,4,5,6)P5 as the first product of phytate hydrolysis. A phytase-negative mutant strain, FZB45/M2, whose phyA gene is disrupted, was generated by replacing the entire wild-type gene on the chromosome of FZB45 with a km::phyA fragment, and culture filtrates obtained from FZB45/M2 did not stimulate plant growth. In addition, the growth of maize seedlings was promoted in the presence of purified phytase and the absence of culture filtrate. These genetic and biochemical experiments provide strong evidence that phytase activity of B. amyloliquefaciens FZB45 is important for plant growth stimulation under phosphate limitation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
DNA sequencing with chain-terminating inhibitors
Sanger, F., Nicklen, S., & Coulson, A. R. (1977) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.74.12.5463 · Cited by 68,572
Smith, M. C. M. (1991) · FEBS Letters · doi:10.1016/0014-5793(91)80059-c · Cited by 1,519
Molecular basis of plant growth promotion and biocontrol by rhizobacteria
Bloemberg, G. V., & Lugtenberg, B. J. J. (2001) · Current Opinion in Plant Biology · doi:10.1016/s1369-5266(00)00183-7 · Cited by 1,039
Grayston, S. J., Vaughan, D., & Jones, D. (1997) · Applied Soil Ecology · doi:10.1016/s0929-1393(96)00126-6 · Cited by 999
Steenhoudt, O., & Vanderleyden, J. (2000) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1016/s0168-6445(00)00036-x · Cited by 992
Free-living bacterial inocula for enhancing crop productivity
Kloepper, J. W., Lifshitz, R., & Zablotowicz, R. M. (1989) · Trends in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/0167-7799(89)90057-7 · Cited by 957
Biocontrol of plant disease: a (Gram-) positive perspective
Emmert, E. (1999) · FEMS Microbiology Letters · doi:10.1016/s0378-1097(98)00570-9 · Cited by 656
Timmusk, S., & Wagner, E. G. H. (1999) · Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions® · doi:10.1094/mpmi.1999.12.11.951 · Cited by 558
Survey of indigenous bacterial endophytes from cotton and sweet corn
McInroy, J. A., & Kloepper, J. W. (1995) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/bf00011472 · Cited by 460
Salt stress is an environmental signal affecting degradative enzyme synthesis in Bacillus subtilis
Kunst, F., & Rapoport, G. (1995) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.177.9.2403-2407.1995 · Cited by 439
Cited by
Soil enzymes in a changing environment: Current knowledge and future directions
Burns, R. G., DeForest, J. L., Marxsen, J., Sinsabaugh, R. L., Stromberger, M. E., Wallenstein, M. D., Weintraub, M. N., & Zoppini, A. (2013) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.11.009 · Cited by 2,552
Agricultural uses of plant biostimulants
Calvo, P., Nelson, L., & Kloepper, J. W. (2014) · Plant and Soil · doi:10.1007/s11104-014-2131-8 · Cited by 2,294
Soil beneficial bacteria and their role in plant growth promotion: a review
Hayat, R., Ali, S., Amara, U., Khalid, R., & Ahmed, I. (2010) · Annals of Microbiology · doi:10.1007/s13213-010-0117-1 · Cited by 2,064
Plant–microbes interactions in enhanced fertilizer-use efficiency
Adesemoye, A. O., & Kloepper, J. W. (2009) · Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s00253-009-2196-0 · Cited by 889
Chen, X. H., Koumoutsi, A., Scholz, R., Eisenreich, A., Schneider, K., Heinemeyer, I., Morgenstern, B., Voss, B., Hess, W. R., Reva, O., et al. (2007) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1325 · Cited by 873
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Idriss, E. E., Makarewicz, O., Farouk, A., Rosner, K., Greiner, R., Bochow, H., Richter, T., & Borriss, R.
- Venue
- Microbiology
- Publisher
- Microbiology Society
- Published
- 2002-07-01
- Volume
- 148
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 2097-2109
- ISSN
- 1350-0872 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-2080
- OpenAlex
- W2169068902
- Cited by
- 447
- References
- 33
- FWCI
- 5.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Extracellular phytase activity of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB45 contributes to its plant-growth-promoting effect a aThe GenBank accession numbers for the sequences determined in this work are AY055219 to AY055226. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1099/00221287-148-7-2097
- The paper
- Idriss, E. E., Makarewicz, O., Farouk, A., Rosner, K., Greiner, R., Bochow, H., Richter, T., & Borriss, R. (2002). Extracellular phytase activity of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens FZB45 contributes to its plant-growth-promoting effect a aThe GenBank accession numbers for the sequences determined in this work are AY055219 to AY055226. Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1099/00221287-148-7-2097
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.