The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Filamentous Chloroflexi (green non-sulfur bacteria) are abundant in wastewater treatment processes with biological nutrient removal c cThe EMBL accession numbers for the sequences reported in this paper are X84472 (strain SBR1029 16S rDNA), X84474 (strain SBR1031 16S rDNA), X84498 (strain SBR1064 16S rDNA), X84565 (strain SBR2022 16S rDNA), X84576 (strain SBR2037 16S rDNA) and X84607 (strain SBR2076 16S rDNA).
Open accessAbstract
Most filamentous bacteria in biological nutrient removal (BNR) processes have not been identified beyond their morphotype and simple staining reactions. Furthermore, the majority of sludge filaments observed under the microscope do not hybridize to commonly used phylogenetic probes for well characterized bacterial phyla such as the Proteobacteria, Actinobacteria, Firmicutes and BACTEROIDETES: Specific 16S rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes were designed for the phylum Chloroflexi (green non-sulfur bacteria) and optimized for use in fluorescence in situ hybridization. Chloroflexi have been implicated in BNR systems by phylogenetic identification of filamentous bacteria isolated by micromanipulation from sludge and culture-independent molecular phylogenetic surveys. The predominant morphotype responding to the probes was filamentous and these filaments were generally abundant in 10 Australian full-scale and two laboratory-scale BNR samples examined. Filamentous bacteria responding to a subdivision 1 Chloroflexi probe were rare in the samples, whereas subdivision 3 Chloroflexi filaments were very common in some sludges. This is in direct contrast to results obtained from molecular phylogenetic surveys of BNR systems where most sludge 16S rDNA clones belong to subdivision 1 and only a few to subdivision 3. It is suggested that filamentous bacteria belonging to the Chloroflexi phylum account for a large fraction of phylogenetically uncharacterized filaments in BNR systems and are likely to be abundant in such systems on a global scale.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Woese, C. R. (1987) · Microbiological Reviews · doi:10.1128/mr.51.2.221-271.1987 · Cited by 5,042 · cited 2×
“Bergey’s Manual of Systematic Bacteriology has formally proposed the name Chloroflexi (Garrity & Holt, 2001) to supersede the previous common name ‘green non-sulfur ’ (Woese, 1987) for this phylum of bacteria.”
BackgroundTriggers for microbial aggregation in activated sludge
Bossier, P., & Verstraete, W. (1996) · Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s002530050640 · Cited by 168
Cited by
Dewhirst, F. E., Chen, T., Izard, J., Paster, B. J., Tanner, A. C. R., Yu, W.-H., Lakshmanan, A., & Wade, W. G. (2010) · Journal of Bacteriology · doi:10.1128/jb.00542-10 · Cited by 3,352
ARIESYADY, H., ITO, T., & OKABE, S. (2007) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2006.12.036 · Cited by 549
Recent Advances in Heterogeneous Photocatalytic Decolorization of Synthetic Dyes
Muhd Julkapli, N., Bagheri, S., & Bee Abd Hamid, S. (2014) · The Scientific World Journal · doi:10.1155/2014/692307 · Cited by 280
Miura, Y., Watanabe, Y., & Okabe, S. (2007) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es071263x · Cited by 275
Okabe, S., Kindaichi, T., & Ito, T. (2005) · Applied and Environmental Microbiology · doi:10.1128/aem.71.7.3987-3994.2005 · Cited by 171
Metadata
- Authors
- Björnsson, L., Hugenholtz, P., Tyson, G. W., & Blackall, L. L.
- Venue
- Microbiology
- Publisher
- Microbiology Society
- Published
- 2002-08-01
- Volume
- 148
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2309-2318
- ISSN
- 1350-0872 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-2080
- OpenAlex
- W2098623840
- Cited by
- 293
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 8.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Filamentous Chloroflexi (green non-sulfur bacteria) are abundant in wastewater treatment processes with biological nutrient removal c cThe EMBL accession numbers for the sequences reported in this paper are X84472 (strain SBR1029 16S rDNA), X84474 (strain SBR1031 16S rDNA), X84498 (strain SBR1064 16S rDNA), X84565 (strain SBR2022 16S rDNA), X84576 (strain SBR2037 16S rDNA) and X84607 (strain SBR2076 16S rDNA). https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1099/00221287-148-8-2309
- The paper
- Björnsson, L., Hugenholtz, P., Tyson, G. W., & Blackall, L. L. (2002). Filamentous Chloroflexi (green non-sulfur bacteria) are abundant in wastewater treatment processes with biological nutrient removal c cThe EMBL accession numbers for the sequences reported in this paper are X84472 (strain SBR1029 16S rDNA), X84474 (strain SBR1031 16S rDNA), X84498 (strain SBR1064 16S rDNA), X84565 (strain SBR2022 16S rDNA), X84576 (strain SBR2037 16S rDNA) and X84607 (strain SBR2076 16S rDNA). Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1099/00221287-148-8-2309
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.