Cited by 21Yeasts and Rust Fungi StudiesFungal and yeast genetics researchPlant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases

Geotrichum bryndzae sp. nov., a novel asexual arthroconidial yeast species related to the genus Galactomyces

Sulo, P., Laurencik, M., Polakova, S., Minarik, G., Slavikova, E.·2009·INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATIC AND EVOLUTIONARY MICROBIOLOGY

Abstract

Ten strains of an asexual arthroconidial yeast species were isolated from Bryndza, a traditional Slovak artisanal sheep cheese, which was manufactured from raw milk during a 4-month summer production period at two Slovakian sites (the northern RuZomberok and the central-southern Tisovec areas). Sequence comparison of the D1/D2 domains of the large-subunit rRNA gene revealed that this yeast represents a novel species of the genus Geotrichum, which contains anamorphs of the ascogenous genus Galactomyces, for which the name Geotrichum bryndzae sp. nov. is proposed (type culture CCY 16-2-1T=NRRL Y-48450T=CBS 11176T). The novel species is most closely related to Geotrichum silvicola NRRL Y-27641T, although yeasts with identical or very similar sequences have been found throughout the world.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1099/ijs.0.008938-0

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Barnett, J. A., Payne, R. W. & Yarrow, D. (2000). In Yeasts: Characteristics and Identification , 3rd edn, pp. 388-394. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Authors
Sulo, P., Laurencik, M., Polakova, S., Minarik, G., & Slavikova, E.
Affiliations
Comenius University Bratislava (SK)
Venue
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATIC AND EVOLUTIONARY MICROBIOLOGY
Published
2009-07-15
Volume
59
Issue
9
Pages
2370-2374
ISSN
  • 1466-5026 (ISSN-L)
  • 1466-5034
OpenAlex
W2147775562
Cited by
21
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATIC AND EVOLUTIONARY MICROBIOLOGY (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Vedecká Grantová Agentúra MŠVVaŠ SR a SAV
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Yeasts and Rust Fungi Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases
Keywords
new yeast species
MeSH terms
Animals, Cheese, DNA, Fungal, DNA, Ribosomal, Geotrichum, Microscopy, Molecular Sequence Data, Phylogeny, RNA, Fungal, RNA, Ribosomal, Sheep, Cluster Analysis, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Slovakia, Genes, rRNA

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review