Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 358

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

agr function in clinical Staphylococcus aureus isolates

Open access
Traber, Katrina E., Lee, Elsie, Benson, Sarah, Corrigan, Rebecca, Cantera, Mariela, Shopsin, Bo, Novick, Richard P.·2008·Microbiology

Abstract

The accessory gene regulator (agr) of Staphylococcus aureus is a global regulator of the staphylococcal virulon, which includes secreted virulence factors and surface proteins. The agr locus is important for virulence in a variety of animal models of infection, and has been assumed by inference to have a major role in human infection. Although most human clinical S. aureus isolates are agr(+), there have been several reports of agr-defective mutants isolated from infected patients. Since it is well known that the agr locus is genetically labile in vitro, we have addressed the question of whether the reported agr-defective mutants were involved in the infection or could have arisen during post-isolation handling. We obtained a series of new staphylococcal isolates from local clinical infections and handled these with special care to avoid post-isolation mutations. Among these isolates, we found a number of strains with non-haemolytic phenotypes owing to mutations in the agr locus, and others with mutations elsewhere. We have also obtained isolates in which the population was continuously heterogeneous with respect to agr functionality, with agr(+) and agr(-) variants having otherwise indistinguishable chromosomal backgrounds. This finding suggested that the agr(-) variants arose by mutation during the course of the infection. Our results indicate that while most clinical isolates are haemolytic and agr(+), non-haemolytic and agr(-) strains are found in S. aureus infections, and that agr(+) and agr(-) variants may have a cooperative interaction in certain types of infections.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1099/mic.0.2007/011874-0

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 358

Metadata

Authors
Traber, K. E., Lee, E., Benson, S., Corrigan, R., Cantera, M., Shopsin, B., & Novick, R. P.
Venue
Microbiology
Published
2008-08-01
Volume
154
Issue
8
Pages
2265-2274
ISSN
  • 1350-0872 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-2080
OpenAlex
W2136989595
Cited by
358
References
0
FWCI
7.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: agr function in clinical Staphylococcus aureus isolates. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1099/mic.0.2007/011874-0
The paper
Traber, K. E., Lee, E., Benson, S., Corrigan, R., Cantera, M., Shopsin, B., & Novick, R. P. (2008). agr function in clinical Staphylococcus aureus isolates. Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.2007/011874-0

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.