The DOI matches its Crossref record.
agr function in clinical Staphylococcus aureus isolates
Open accessAbstract
The accessory gene regulator (agr) of Staphylococcus aureus is a global regulator of the staphylococcal virulon, which includes secreted virulence factors and surface proteins. The agr locus is important for virulence in a variety of animal models of infection, and has been assumed by inference to have a major role in human infection. Although most human clinical S. aureus isolates are agr(+), there have been several reports of agr-defective mutants isolated from infected patients. Since it is well known that the agr locus is genetically labile in vitro, we have addressed the question of whether the reported agr-defective mutants were involved in the infection or could have arisen during post-isolation handling. We obtained a series of new staphylococcal isolates from local clinical infections and handled these with special care to avoid post-isolation mutations. Among these isolates, we found a number of strains with non-haemolytic phenotypes owing to mutations in the agr locus, and others with mutations elsewhere. We have also obtained isolates in which the population was continuously heterogeneous with respect to agr functionality, with agr(+) and agr(-) variants having otherwise indistinguishable chromosomal backgrounds. This finding suggested that the agr(-) variants arose by mutation during the course of the infection. Our results indicate that while most clinical isolates are haemolytic and agr(+), non-haemolytic and agr(-) strains are found in S. aureus infections, and that agr(+) and agr(-) variants may have a cooperative interaction in certain types of infections.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Pathogenicity and virulence of Staphylococcus aureus
Cheung, G. Y. C., Bae, J. S., & Otto, M. (2021) · Virulence · doi:10.1080/21505594.2021.1878688 · Cited by 1,380
Quorum Sensing in Staphylococci
Novick, R. P., & Geisinger, E. (2008) · Annual Review of Genetics · doi:10.1146/annurev.genet.42.110807.091640 · Cited by 958
Self-citationHow Staphylococcus aureus biofilms develop their characteristic structure
Periasamy, S., Joo, H.-S., Duong, A. C., Bach, T.-H. L., Tan, V. Y., Chatterjee, S. S., Cheung, G. Y. C., & Otto, M. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1115006109 · Cited by 640
Quorum-sensing regulation in staphylococci—an overview
Le, K. Y., & Otto, M. (2015) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2015.01174 · Cited by 490
Tuchscherr, L., Medina, E., Hussain, M., Völker, W., Heitmann, V., Niemann, S., Holzinger, D., Roth, J., Proctor, R. A., Becker, K., et al. (2011) · EMBO Molecular Medicine · doi:10.1002/emmm.201000115 · Cited by 437
Metadata
- Authors
- Traber, K. E., Lee, E., Benson, S., Corrigan, R., Cantera, M., Shopsin, B., & Novick, R. P.
- Venue
- Microbiology
- Publisher
- Microbiology Society
- Published
- 2008-08-01
- Volume
- 154
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2265-2274
- ISSN
- 1350-0872 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-2080
- OpenAlex
- W2136989595
- Cited by
- 358
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 7.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: agr function in clinical Staphylococcus aureus isolates. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1099/mic.0.2007/011874-0
- The paper
- Traber, K. E., Lee, E., Benson, S., Corrigan, R., Cantera, M., Shopsin, B., & Novick, R. P. (2008). agr function in clinical Staphylococcus aureus isolates. Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1099/mic.0.2007/011874-0
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.