Cited by 11Food Quality and Safety StudiesFermentation and Sensory AnalysisFood Nutrient Composition and Product Development

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Quality characteristics of detoxified Rhus verniciflua vinegar fermented using different acetic acid bacteria

Open access
Baek, Seong Yeol, Kim, Ji-Seon, Mun, Ji-Young, Lee, Choong Hwan, Park, Yoo Kyoung, Yeo, Soo-Hwan·2016·Korean Journal of Food Preservation

Abstract

To investigate the effect of different acetic acid bacteria on qualities of detoxified Rhus verniciflua vinegar (DRV), different DRVs were produced by using three acetic acid bacterial strains including Acetobacter pasteurianus KACC16934 (AP), Acetobacter malorum V5-7 (AM), and Gluconoacetobacter entanii RDAF-S (GE). Little difference in pH (2.87~2.90) or titratable acidity (5.33~5.68%) was observed among different DRVs. Acetic acid yields of the AP, AM, and GE strains were 78.6%, 85.3%, and 85.9%, respectively. Organic acid content in different DRVs was in the range of 69.84~73.83 mg/mL. Oxalic acid, malic acid, succinic acid, acetic acid, and fumaric acid were detected in all DRVs. And glutamic acid, alanine, valine, leucine, tyrosine, lysine, anserine, and arginine were detected in all DRVs. Arginine and alanine were the predominant amino acids in all DRVs. PCA plots of electronic nose analysis data showed a significant differentiation of DRVs from different acetic acid bacterial strains. A sensory evaluation of all DRVs indicated that DRV fermented using AM was superior in the aspect of flavor, tasted and overall preference.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.11002/kjfp.2016.23.3.347

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In Rhus verniciflua vinegar fermented by Acetobacter pasteurianus KACC16934 (AP), the main free amino acids were arginine (277.74 μg/mL), tyrosine (160.17 μg/mL), and alanine (158.95 μg/mL); by Acetobacter malorum V5-7 (AM), arginine (277.74 μg/mL), alanine (181.90 μg/mL), and proline (172.85 μg/mL); by Gluconoacetobacter entanii RDAF-S (GE), arginine (278.28 μg/mL) and alanine (273.67 μg/mL).

    “The analysis revealed that the main free amino acids in the vinegar fermented by AP were arginine (277.74 μg/mL), tyrosine (160.17 μg/mL), and alanine (158.95 μg/mL). For the vinegar fermented by AM, the primary free amino acids were arginine (277.74 μg/mL), alanine (181.90 μg/mL), and proline (172.85 μg/mL). In contrast, the vinegar fermented by GE contained arginine (278.28 μg/mL) and alanine (”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 16

  1. Jung NC 1998 Biological activity of urushiol and flavonoids from Lac tree (Rhus verniciflua Stokes) Ph D Thesis Chonnam National University, Korea 9 21
  2. Baek SY Lee CH Park YK Choi HS Mun JY Yeo SH 2015 Quality Characteristics of fermented vinegar prepared with the detoxified Rhus verniciflua extract. Korean J Food Preserv 22 674 682 10.11002/kjfp.2015.22.5.674 · DOI
  3. Sengun IY Karabiyikli S 2011 Importance of acetic acid bacteria in food industry. Food Control 22 647 656 10.1016/j.foodcont.2010.11.008 · DOI
  4. Gonzalez A Mas A 2011 Differentiation of acetic acid bacteria based on sequence analysis of 16S-23S rRNA gene internal transcribed spacer sequences. Int J Food Microbiol 147 217 222 21543129 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2011.04.005 · DOI
  5. Park MH Lee JO Lee JY Yu SJ Ko YJ Kim YH Ryu CH 2005 Isolation and characteristics of acetic acid bacteria for persimmon vinegar fermentation. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr 34 1251 1257 · DOI
  6. Kang BH Shin EJ Lee SH Lee DS Hur SS Shin KS Kim SH Son SM Lee JM 2011 Optimization of the acetic acid fermentation condition of apple juice. Korean J Food Preserv 18 980 985 10.11002/kjfp.2011.18.6.980 · DOI
  7. Yi MR Hwang JH Oh YS Oh HJ Lim SB 2014 Quality characteristics and antioxidant activity of immature Citrus unshiu vinegar. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr 43 250 257 10.3746/jkfn.2014.43.2.250 · DOI
  8. Baek SY Park HY Lee CH Yeo SH 2014 Comparison of the fermented property and isolation of acetic-acid bacteria from traditional Korean vinegar. Korean J Food Preserv 21 903 907 10.11002/kjfp.2014.21.6.903 · DOI
  9. Chen XH Lou WY Zong MH Smith TJ 2011 Optimization of culture conditions to produce high yields of active Acetobacter sp. CCTCC M209061 cells for anti-Prelog reduction of prochiral ketones. BMC Biotechnol 11 110 121 22099947 10.1186/1472-6750-11-110 PMC3341575 · DOI
  10. Jo IH Kim HS Kim GM Kim JS Kim GC 2012 Effects of packaging method on the quality of blanched Namul during storage. Korean J Food Preserv 19 328 336 10.11002/kjfp.2012.19.3.328 · DOI
  11. Hidalgo C Torija MJ Mas A Mateo E 2013 Effect of inoculation on strawberry fermentation and acetification processes using native strains of yeast and acetic acid bacteria. Food Microbiol 34 88 94 23498182 10.1016/j.fm.2012.11.019 · DOI
  12. Woo SM Yeo SH Kwon JH Kim SH Jeong YJ 2015 Quality characteristics of high-acidity vinegar prepared with grape juice. Korean J Food Preserv 22 100 107 10.11002/kjfp.2015.22.1.100 · DOI
  13. Schuller G Hertel C Hammes WP 2000 Gluconacetobacter entanii sp. nov., isolated from submerged high-acid industrial vinegar fermentations. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 50 2013 2020 11155975 10.1099/00207713-50-6-2013 · DOI
  14. Shin JS Jeong YJ 2003 Changes in the components of acetic acid fermentation of brown rice using raw starch digesting enzyme. J Korean Soc Food Sci Nutr 32 381 387 10.3746/jkfn.2003.32.3.381 · DOI
  15. Choi HS Yeo SH Jeong ST Choi JH Kang JE Kim MK 2012 Effect of the extracts from fermented-Rhus verniciflua stem bark with Fomitella fraxinea on the growth and enzyme activity of soybean productfermenting microorganisms. Kor J Mycol 40 235 243 10.4489/kjm.2012.40.4.235 · DOI
  16. Hong HK Shin HW Park HS Yun DH Kwon CH Lee KC Kim ST Moriizumi T 1996 Gas identification using micro gas sensor array and neural-network pattern recognition Sensors and Actuators B33 68 71 10.1016/0925-4005(96)01892-8 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Baek, S. Y., Kim, J.-S., Mun, J.-Y., Lee, C. H., Park, Y. K., & Yeo, S.-H.
Affiliations
  • Konkuk University (KR)
  • Kyung Hee University (KR)
Venue
Korean Journal of Food Preservation
Published
2016-06
Volume
23
Issue
3
Pages
347-354
ISSN
  • 1738-7248 (ISSN-L)
  • 2287-7428
OpenAlex
W2510744463
Cited by
11
References
2
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2
FWCI
1.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
Korean Journal of Food Preservation (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
Rural Development Administration (PJ00982601)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Quality and Safety Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Fermentation and Sensory Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Nutrient Composition and Product Development
Keywords
Rhus verniciflua, detoxification, acetic acid bacteria, Acetobacter pasteurianus, Acetobacter malorum, vinegar fermentation, acetic acid yield, organic acids, amino acids, electronic nose, sensory evaluation, vinegar quality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review