The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cell-cycle coupled expression minimizes random fluctuations in gene product levels
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1098/rsos.160578 · Paper page
Abstract
Expression of many genes varies as a cell transitions through different cell-cycle stages. How coupling between stochastic expression and cell cycle impacts cell-to-cell variability (noise) in the level of protein is not well understood. We analyze a model, where a stable protein is synthesized in random bursts, and the frequency with which bursts occur varies within the cell cycle. Formulas quantifying the extent of fluctuations in the protein copy number are derived and decomposed into components arising from the cell cycle and stochastic processes. The latter stochastic component represents contributions from bursty expression and errors incurred during partitioning of molecules between daughter cells. These formulas reveal an interesting trade-off: cell-cycle dependencies that amplify the noise contribution from bursty expression also attenuate the contribution from partitioning errors. We investigate existence of optimum strategies for coupling expression to the cell cycle that minimize the stochastic component. Intriguingly, results show that a zero production rate throughout the cell cycle, with expression only occurring just before cell division minimizes noise from bursty expression for a fixed mean protein level. In contrast, the optimal strategy in the case of partitioning errors is to make the protein just after cell division. We provide examples of regulatory proteins that are expressed only towards the end of cell cycle, and argue that such strategies enhance robustness of cell-cycle decisions to the intrinsic stochasticity of gene expression.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Global quantification of mammalian gene expression control
Schwanhäusser, B., Busse, D., Li, N., Dittmar, G., Schuchhardt, J., Wolf, J., Chen, W., & Selbach, M. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10098 · Cited by 6,566 · cited 1×
“In contrast, CV2 is the “intrinsic noise” resulting from stochasticity in gene expression and partitioning processes, and is measured by subtracting the extrinsic noise from the total noise Having appropriately defined the noise level, we next compute it using moment equations.”
Method
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 72
- 10.1038/nature01546 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1105891 · DOI
- 10.1038/nrg1615 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1231456 · DOI
- 2014, Stochastic gene expression in mammals: lessons from olfaction, Trends in Cell Biology, 23, 449
- 10.1101/gad.235770.113 · DOI
- 10.1038/ng.821 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1198817 · DOI · Paper page
- R. D. Dar , B. S. Razooky , A. Singh , T. V. Trimeloni , J. M. McCollum , C. D. Cox , M. L. Simpson , and L. S. Weinberger , “Transcriptional burst frequency and burst size are equally modulated across the human genome,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 109, pp. 17 454–17 459, 2012. · DOI
- 10.1016/j.bpj.2014.09.017 · DOI
- 10.1101/gr.139378.112 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040309 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/msb.2012.38 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.01.027 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.molcel.2016.03.007 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv007 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1417527111 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature04599 · DOI · Paper page
- V. Shahrezaei and P. S. Swain , “Analytical distributions for stochastic gene expression,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 105, pp. 17 256–17 261, 2008. · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.bpj.2009.02.064 · DOI
- 10.1038/ng869 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1161427 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.bpj.2010.03.001 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature09326 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.mib.2009.06.016 · DOI
- 2014, Stochastic holin expression can account for lysis time variation in the bacteriophage λ, Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 11, 20140140, 10.1098/rsif.2014.0140 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cell.2008.09.050 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.aac9786 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev-micro-091213-112852 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1119623 · DOI · Paper page
- 2013, Cell-cycle dependence of transcription dominates noise in gene expression, PLOS Computational Biology, 9, e1003161, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003161 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.7554/elife.12175 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.03.005 · DOI
- D. Huh and J. Paulsson , “Random partitioning of molecules at cell division,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 108, pp. 15 004–15 009, 2011. · DOI
- 2015, Quantifying selective pressures driving bacterial evolution using lineage analysis, Physical Review X, 5, 011016
- 2008, Timing the start of division in e. coli: a single-cell study, Physical Biology, 5, 046001, 10.1088/1478-3975/5/4/046001 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000367 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0012775 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0905629106 · DOI
- 2013, Age-dependent stochastic models for understanding population fluctuations in continuously cultured cells, Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 10, 20130325, 10.1098/rsif.2013.0325 · DOI
- 2013, Modeling the effect of cell division on genetic oscillators, Journal of Theoretical Biology, 325, 22, 10.1016/j.jtbi.2013.02.001 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jtbi.2014.04.018 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1188308 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.cell.2005.09.031 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/0022-5193(78)90326-0 · DOI
- 10.1016/0022-5193(79)90013-4 · DOI
- 10.1038/ng.729 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.2408422 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.3103264 · DOI
- 10.1529/biophysj.106.093781 · DOI
- 10.1109/TAC.2010.2088631 · DOI
- 2009, Moment closure approximations for mass-action models, IET Systems Biology, 3, 52, 10.1049/iet-syb:20070031 · DOI
- 2015, Conditional moment closure schemes for studying stochastic dynamics of genetic circuits, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Systems and Circuits, 9, 518, 10.1109/TBCAS.2015.2453158 · DOI
- J. Zhang , L. DeVille , S. Dhople , and A. Dominguez-Garcia , “A maximum entropy approach to the moment closure problem for stochastic hybrid systems at equilibrium,” in IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, 2014, pp. 747–752. · DOI
- 10.1098/rsta.2010.0211 · DOI
- P. S. Swain , M. B. Elowitz , and E. D. Siggia , “Intrinsic and extrinsic contributions to stochasticity in gene expression,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 99, pp. 12 795–12 800, 2002. · DOI · Paper page
- 2013, Quantifying intrinsic and extrinsic variability in stochastic gene expression models, PLOS ONE, 8, e84301, 10.1371/journal.pone.0084301 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.bpj.2013.10.033 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.bpj.2008.09.052 · DOI
- 10.1529/biophysj.107.127035 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.bpj.2010.12.3737 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.plrev.2005.03.003 · DOI
- 2015, Nonspecific transcription factor binding can reduce noise in the expression of downstream proteins, Physical Biology, 12, 055002, 10.1088/1478-3975/12/5/055002 · DOI
- 10.7554/eLife.10767 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature14908 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.tcb.2015.10.006 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.208102 · DOI
- 2015, A mechanistic first-passage time framework for bacterial cell-division timing
- C. A. Vargas-Garcia and A. Singh , “Hybrid systems approach to modeling stochastic dynamics of cell size,” bioRxiv, p. 044131, 2016.
- 10.2307/3212214 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.1378322 · DOI
- 2005, Stochastic models for chemically reacting systems using polynomial stochastic hybrid systems, International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, 15, 669, 10.1002/rnc.1017 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Soltani, M., & Singh, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Delaware (US)
- Corresponding author
- Singh, Abhyudai
- Venue
- Royal Society Open Science
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2016-05-08
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 160578-160578
- ISSN
- 2054-5703 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC5210684
- OpenAlex
- W2560588933
- Cited by
- 32
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 2.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Royal Society Open Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (1312926)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › stochastic dynamics and bifurcation
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Mathematical Physics › Stochastic processes and statistical mechanics
- Keywords
- cell cycle, stochastic gene expression, cell-to-cell variability, cell division, protein synthesis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review