Cited by 927Gene Regulatory Network AnalysisGenomics and Chromatin DynamicsRNA Research and Splicing

Mammalian genes are transcribed with widely different bursting kinetics

Open access
Suter, David M., Molina, Nacho, Gatfield, David, Schneider, Kim, Schibler, Ueli, Naef, Felix·2011·Science

Abstract

In prokaryotes and eukaryotes, most genes appear to be transcribed during short periods called transcriptional bursts, interspersed by silent intervals. We describe how such bursts generate gene-specific temporal patterns of messenger RNA (mRNA) synthesis in mammalian cells. To monitor transcription at high temporal resolution, we established various gene trap cell lines and transgenic cell lines expressing a short-lived luciferase protein from an unstable mRNA, and recorded bioluminescence in real time in single cells. Mathematical modeling identified gene-specific on- and off-switching rates in transcriptional activity and mean numbers of mRNAs produced during the bursts. Transcriptional kinetics were markedly altered by cis-regulatory DNA elements. Our analysis demonstrated that bursting kinetics are highly gene-specific, reflecting refractory periods during which genes stay inactive for a certain time before switching on again.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.1198817

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Promoter state is not solely determined by instantaneous TF occupancy, consistent with a model in which the timescales of TF binding and promoter activation are similar, and suggests that promoters integrate information from multiple rounds of TF binding.

    “The finding that promoter state is not solely determined by instantaneous TF occupancy is consistent with a model in which the timescales of TF binding and promoter activation are similar (compare Fig. 3H to Fig. S4K for dissimilar timescales) and suggests that promoters integrate information from multiple rounds of TF binding34,35”
  • When one takes into account the pulsatile nature of transcription and the stochastic nature of RNA-seq transcript sampling, the observed numbers of neurons expressing NPP genes might be best understood as lower limits.

    “When one takes into account the pulsatile nature of transcription (Suter et al., 2011) and the stochastic nature of RNA-seq transcript sampling (Fu and Pachter, 2016; Kim et al., 2015; Tasic et al., 2016), these numbers might be best understood as lower limits.”

    From Single-cell transcriptomic evidence for dense intracortical neuropeptide networks (2019) · cites this paper as Suter et al., 2011

  • The observed numbers of neurons expressing NP-GPCR genes must be understood as lower limits after taking into account pulsatile transcription and stochastic sampling.

    “Again, these numbers must be understood as lower limits to percentages of cortical neurons actually expressing at least one of the 29 NP-GPCR genes, after taking into account the pulsatile transcription and stochastic sampling issues cited above.”

    From Single-cell transcriptomic evidence for dense intracortical neuropeptide networks (2019) · cites this paper as Suter et al., 2011

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Suter, D. M., Molina, N., Gatfield, D., Schneider, K., Schibler, U., & Naef, F.
Affiliations
  • University of Geneva (CH)
  • SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics (CH)
  • Institute of Bioengineering, School of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne and Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, AAB 021 Station 15, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Venue
Science
Published
2011-04-22
Volume
332
Issue
6028
Pages
472-474
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2105512180
Cited by
927
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 40 · 2025: 54 · 2024: 69 · 2023: 53 · 2022: 60 · 2021: 76 · 2020: 86 · 2019: 80 · 2018: 65 · 2017: 54 · 2016: 61 · 2015: 57 · 2014: 40 · 2013: 59 · 2012: 59
FWCI
22.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • IRIS (submittedVersion)
  • SERVAL (Université de Lausanne) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
Keywords
transcriptional bursting, transcriptional kinetics, mRNA synthesis, refractory period, cis-regulatory elements, luciferase reporter, mammalian gene expression
MeSH terms
Acetylation, Animals, Cells, Cultured, Chromatin, Circadian Rhythm, Histones, Kinetics, Luminescent Measurements, Models, Genetic, Promoter Regions, Genetic, RNA, Messenger, Stochastic Processes, Transcription, Genetic, Protein Biosynthesis, Transcriptional Activation, Down-Regulation, Up-Regulation, Gene Expression, Transgenes, NIH 3T3 Cells, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review