PreprintCited by 65Gene Regulatory Network AnalysisStochastic processes and statistical mechanicsSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effects of cell cycle variability on lineage and population measurements of mRNA abundance

Open access
Perez-Carrasco, Ruben, Beentjes, Casper, Grima, Ramon·2020·Journal of The Royal Society Interface

Preprint — published as 10.1098/rsif.2020.0360 · Paper page

Abstract

Many models of gene expression do not explicitly incorporate a cell cycle description. Here we derive a theory describing how mRNA fluctuations for constitutive and bursty gene expression are influenced by stochasticity in the duration of the cell cycle and the timing of DNA replication. Analytical expressions for the moments show that omitting cell cycle duration introduces an error in the predicted mean number of mRNAs that is a monotonically decreasing function of η , which is proportional to the ratio of the mean cell cycle duration and the mRNA lifetime. By contrast, the error in the variance of the mRNA distribution is highest for intermediate values of η consistent with genome-wide measurements in many organisms. Using eukaryotic cell data, we estimate the errors in the mean and variance to be at most 3% and 25%, respectively. Furthermore, we derive an accurate negative binomial mixture approximation to the mRNA distribution. This indicates that stochasticity in the cell cycle can introduce fluctuations in mRNA numbers that are similar to the effect of bursty transcription. Finally, we show that for real experimental data, disregarding cell cycle stochasticity can introduce errors in the inference of transcription rates larger than 10%.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2020.03.24.006494

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

  • Global quantification of mammalian gene expression control

    Schwanhäusser, B., Busse, D., Li, N., Dittmar, G., Schuchhardt, J., Wolf, J., Chen, W., & Selbach, M. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10098 · Cited by 6,566 · cited 8×

    “145h−1 and N = 4 using the reported cell cycle duration and variability in [19] (see Appendix F), while replication is considered to occur at the middle of the cell cycle (w = 1/2).”
    BackgroundMethodInfluential

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 57

  1. 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040309 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1038/nsmb.1514 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.7554/eLife.12248 · DOI
  4. N. Van Kampen , Stochastic Processes in Physics and Chemistry. North-Holland Personal Library, Elsevier Science, 2011.
  5. 2020, Exact solution of stochastic gene expression models with bursting, cell cycle and replication dynamics, Phys. Rev. E, vol, 101, 032403, 10.1103/PhysRevE.101.032403 · DOI
  6. 10.1073/pnas.1910888117 · DOI
  7. I. G. Johnston and N. S. Jones , “Closed-form stochastic solutions for non-equilibrium dynamics and inheritance of cellular components over many cell divisions,” Proc. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci., vol. 471, no. 2180, 2015. · DOI
  8. 10.1073/pnas.1013171108 · DOI
  9. 2020, Models of protein production along the cell cycle: An investigation of possible sources of noise, PLoS One, vol, 15, 1
  10. 10.1016/j.bpj.2014.05.004 · DOI
  11. P Thomas , “Making sense of snapshot data: Ergodic principle for clonal cell populations,” J. R. Soc. Interface, vol. 14, no. 136, 2017. · DOI
  12. M. Soltani and A. Singh , “Effects of cell-cycle-dependent expression on random fluctuations in protein levels,” R. Soc. Open Sci., vol. 3, no. 12, 2016. · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004972 · DOI
  14. 2019, Exactly solvable model of gene expression in a proliferating bacterial cell population with stochastic protein bursts and protein partitioning, Phys. Rev. E, 99, 042416, 10.1103/PhysRevE.99.042416 · DOI
  15. 10.1007/BF01190834 · DOI
  16. 10.1098/rsif.2013.0895 · DOI
  17. E. Gavagnin , S. T. Vittadello , G. Guanasingh , N. K. Haass , M. J. Simpson , T. Rogers , and C. A. Yates , “Synchronised oscillations in growing cell populations are explained by demographic noise,” bioRxiv, 2020. · DOI
  18. 10.1126/science.aax3072 · DOI
  19. 2017, A Multi-stage Representation of Cell Proliferation as a Markov Process, Bull. Math. Biol, 79, 2905, 10.1007/s11538-017-0356-4 · DOI
  20. 10.1073/pnas.1818680116 · DOI
  21. 10.1126/science.1213230 · DOI
  22. 10.1093/embo-reports/kve251 · DOI
  23. 1969, Time-Lapse Cinemicrographic Studies of X-Irradiated HeLa S3 Cells: I. Cell Progression and Cell Disintegration, Biophys. J, 9, 607, 10.1016/S0006-3495(69)86407-6 · DOI
  24. 10.1038/nmeth.2138 · DOI
  25. N. Brenner , E. Braun , A. Yoney , L. Susman , J. Rotella , and H. Salman , “Single-cell protein dynamics reproduce universal fluctuations in cell populations,” Eur. Phys. J. E, vol. 38, no. 9, 2015. · DOI
  26. 10.1038/nature06072 · DOI
  27. 10.1073/pnas.1811309115 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/j.cell.2005.04.013 · DOI
  29. 10.1101/gr.102764.109 · DOI
  30. 10.4161/cc.8.7.8042 · DOI
  31. 10.1101/gr.912603 · DOI
  32. 10.1073/pnas.092538799 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/S0076-6879(02)50954-X · DOI · Paper page
  34. 10.1006/jmbi.1999.2710 · DOI
  35. S. T. Vittadello , S. W. McCue , G. Gunasingh , N. K. Haass , and M. J. Simpson , “Mathematical models incorporating a multi-stage cell cycle replicate normally-hidden inherent synchronization in cell proliferation,” J. R. Soc. Interface, vol. 16, no. 157, 2019. · DOI · Paper page
  36. 2019, Simulation and inference algorithms for stochastic biochemical reaction networks: from basic concepts to state-of-the-art, J. R. Soc. Interface, 16, 20180943, 10.1098/rsif.2018.0943 · DOI
  37. 2020, Extrinsic Noise and Heavy-Tailed Laws in Gene Expression, Phys. Rev. Lett, 124, 108101, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.108101 · DOI
  38. 10.1038/ng.821 · DOI
  39. A. D. Cawte , P. J. Unrau , and D. S. Rueda , “Live cell imaging of single RNA molecules with fluorogenic Mango II arrays,” Nat. Commun., vol. 11, no. 1, 2020. · DOI
  40. 2018, An improved MS2 system for accurate reporting of the mRNA life cycle, Nat. Methods, 15, 81, 10.1038/nmeth.4502 · DOI
  41. 2019, Visualizing RNA dynamics in live cells with bright and stable fluorescent RNAs, Nat. Biotechnol, 37, 1287, 10.1038/s41587-019-0249-1 · DOI
  42. 10.1016/S0300-9084(02)01445-1 · DOI
  43. 10.1186/1747-1028-5-1 · DOI
  44. R. Sabi and T. Tuller , “Novel insights into gene expression regulation during meiosis revealed by translation elongation dynamics,” npj Syst. Biol. Appl., vol. 5, no. 1, 2019. · DOI
  45. 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.03.005 · DOI
  46. 10.1073/pnas.1322420111 · DOI
  47. 10.1126/science.1198817 · DOI · Paper page
  48. 10.1016/j.bpj.2013.12.011. · DOI
  49. 10.1128/MCB.24.3.945-953.2004 · DOI
  50. 10.1016/S1534-5807(03)00119-9 · DOI
  51. 10.1073/pnas.95.15.8660 · DOI
  52. 10.1093/emboj/cdg168 · DOI
  53. 10.1016/j.cell.2018.09.056 · DOI
  54. 10.1242/dev.059923 · DOI
  55. 10.1073/pnas.1912500117 · DOI
  56. 10.1126/science.1119623 · DOI · Paper page
  57. 10.1016/0022-5193(78)90326-0 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Perez-Carrasco, R., Beentjes, C., & Grima, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
Corresponding author
Grima, Ramon
Venue
Journal of The Royal Society Interface
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2020-03-25
Volume
17
Issue
168
Pages
20200360-20200360
ISSN
1742-5662 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3038366933
Cited by
65
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 2
FWCI
3.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of The Royal Society Interface (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Leverhulme Trust (RPG-2018-423)
  • Clarendon Fund
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Mathematical Physics › Stochastic processes and statistical mechanics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
Keywords
stochastic gene expression, DNA replication timing, mRNA levels, eukaryotic cells
MeSH terms
Cell Cycle, Cell Division, Models, Genetic, RNA, Messenger, Stochastic Processes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review