PreprintCited by 32Computational Drug Discovery MethodsProtein Structure and DynamicsReceptor Mechanisms and Signaling

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Energy Penalties Enhance Flexible Receptor Docking in a Model Cavity

Open access
Kamenik, Anna S., Singh, Isha, Lak, Parnian, Balius, Trent E., Liedl, Klaus R., Shoichet, Brian K.·2021·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Preprint — published as 10.1073/pnas.2106195118 · Paper page

Abstract

Protein flexibility remains a major challenge in library docking due to difficulties in sampling conformational ensembles with accurate probabilities. Here we use the model cavity site of T4 Lysozyme L99A to test flexible receptor docking with energy penalties from molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. Crystallography with larger and smaller ligands indicates that this cavity can adopt three major conformations, open, intermediate, and closed. Since smaller ligands typically bind better to the cavity site, we anticipate an energy penalty for cavity opening. To estimate its magnitude, we calculate conformational preferences from MD simulations. We find that including a penalty term is essential for retrospective ligand enrichment, otherwise high-energy states dominate the docking. We then prospectively docked a library of over 900,000 compounds for new molecules binding to each conformational state. Absent a penalty term, the open conformation dominated the docking results; inclusion of this term led to a balanced sampling of ligands against each state. High ranked molecules were experimentally tested by T m -upshift and X-ray crystallography. From 33 selected molecules, we identified 18 new ligands and determined 13 crystal structures. Most interesting were those bound to the open cavity, where the buried site opens to bulk solvent. Here, highly unusual ligands for this cavity had been predicted, including large ligands with polar tails; these were confirmed both by binding and by crystallography. In docking, incorporating protein flexibility with thermodynamic weightings may thus access new ligand chemotypes. The MD approach to accessing and, crucially, weighting such alternative states may find general applicability. Significance Statement: The dynamic nature of biomolecules is typically neglected in docking screens for ligand discovery. Key to benefitting from various receptor conformations is not only structural but also thermodynamic information. Here we test a general approach that uses conformational preferences from enhanced and conventional MD simulations to account for the cost of transitions to high energy states. Including this information as a conformational penalty term in a docking scoring function, we perform retrospective and prospective screens and experimentally confirm novel ligands with T m -upshift and X-ray crystallography.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2021.04.20.440636

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 92

  1. 10.1038/nature06522 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 2015, Keep on moving: discovering and perturbing the conformational dynamics of enzymes, Acc Chem Res, 48, 423, 10.1021/ar5003158 · DOI
  3. 10.1038/nchem.1954 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 2018, Dynamics of human protein kinase Aurora A linked to drug selectivity, Elife, 7, e36656, 10.7554/eLife.36656 · DOI
  5. 10.1021/jm049756p · DOI
  6. 10.1016/j.bpj.2018.02.038 · DOI
  7. 10.1038/ncomms12965 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.02.015 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/j.bpj.2018.02.038 · DOI
  10. J. Sørensen , Ö. Demir , R. V. Swift , V. A. Feher , R. E. Amaro , “Molecular docking to flexible targets” in Molecular Modeling of Proteins. (Springer, 2015), pp. 445–469. · DOI
  11. 2015, Multi-conformer ensemble docking to difficult protein targets, J Phys Chem B, 119, 1026, 10.1021/jp506511p · DOI
  12. 2009, An Evaluation of Explicit Receptor Flexibility in Molecular Docking Using Molecular Dynamics and Torsion Angle Molecular Dynamics, J Chem Theory Comput, 5, 2909, 10.1021/ct900262t · DOI
  13. 10.1007/s10822-007-9159-2 · DOI
  14. 2012, Protein flexibility in virtual screening: the BACE-1 case study, J Chem Inf Model, 52, 2697, 10.1021/ci300390h · DOI
  15. 10.1006/jmbi.2001.4551 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/S0959-440X(02)00308-1 · DOI
  17. 10.1038/nsb0902-646 · DOI
  18. 10.1016/j.ejmech.2014.08.004 · DOI
  19. 10.1146/annurev-biophys-042910-155245 · DOI
  20. 10.1063/1.1755656 · DOI
  21. 2019, Mechanisms for Benzene Dissociation through the Excited State of T4 Lysozyme L99A Mutant, Biophys J, 116, 205, 10.1016/j.bpj.2018.09.035 · DOI
  22. 10.1021/ct300284c · DOI
  23. 2018, Peptidic Macrocycles - Conformational Sampling and Thermodynamic Characterization, J Chem Inf Model, 58, 982, 10.1021/acs.jcim.8b00097 · DOI
  24. 10.1038/355371a0 · DOI
  25. 10.1126/science.1553543 · DOI
  26. 10.1021/bi00027a006 · DOI
  27. 10.1002/pro.344 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1073/pnas.1500806112 · DOI
  29. 2016, Hydrogen Bonding of 1,2-Azaborines in the Binding Cavity of T4 Lysozyme Mutants: Structures and Thermodynamics, J Am Chem Soc, 138, 12021, 10.1021/jacs.6b06566 · DOI
  30. 10.1073/pnas.1703287114 · DOI
  31. 10.1021/bi00027a007 · DOI
  32. 10.1073/pnas.1506505112 · DOI
  33. 10.1038/nature10349 · DOI
  34. D. Ming , R. Chen , H. Huang , Amino-Acid Network Clique Analysis of Protein Mutation Non-Additive Effects: A Case Study of Lysozme. Int J Mol Sci 19 (2018). · DOI
  35. 2019, Structural Characterization of Biomolecules through Atomistic Simulations Guided by DEER Measurements, Structure, 27, 359, 10.1016/j.str.2018.10.013 · DOI
  36. 2016, Atomistic picture of conformational exchange in a T4 lysozyme cavity mutant: an experiment-guided molecular dynamics study, Chem Sci, 7, 3602, 10.1039/C5SC03886C · DOI
  37. 2019, Enhanced Sampling of Protein Conformational Transitions via Dynamically Optimized Collective Variables, J Chem Theory Comput, 15, 1393, 10.1021/acs.jctc.8b00827 · DOI
  38. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006180 · DOI
  39. 2019, Toward Achieving Efficient and Accurate Ligand-Protein Unbinding with Deep Learning and Molecular Dynamics through RAVE, J Chem Theory Comput, 15, 708, 10.1021/acs.jctc.8b00869 · DOI
  40. 10.7554/eLife.17505 · DOI
  41. 10.1021/acs.jctc.5b00436 · DOI
  42. 2017, Identification and Validation of Reaction Coordinates Describing Protein Functional Motion: Hierarchical Dynamics of T4 Lysozyme, J Chem Theory Comput, 13, 5076, 10.1021/acs.jctc.7b00571 · DOI
  43. 2016, Seeing the Unseen: Sampling the Excited State of T4 Lysozyme L99A with Simulations on the Anton Supercomputer, Biophysical Journal, 110, 11a, 10.1016/j.bpj.2015.11.120 · DOI
  44. 2018, Escape of a Small Molecule from Inside T4 Lysozyme by Multiple Pathways, Biophys J, 114, 1058, 10.1016/j.bpj.2018.01.014 · DOI
  45. 2018, Enhanced Monte Carlo Methods for Modeling Proteins Including Computation of Absolute Free Energies of Binding, Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation, 14, 3279, 10.1021/acs.jctc.8b00031 · DOI
  46. 2017, Absolute Binding Free Energies between T4 Lysozyme and 141 Small Molecules: Calculations Based on Multiple Rigid Receptor Configurations, J Chem Theory Comput, 13, 2930, 10.1021/acs.jctc.6b01183 · DOI
  47. 2016, Sensitivity in Binding Free Energies Due to Protein Reorganization, J Chem Theory Comput, 12, 4620, 10.1021/acs.jctc.6b00532 · DOI
  48. 2018, Binding Modes of Ligands Using Enhanced Sampling (BLUES): Rapid Decorrelation of Ligand Binding Modes via Nonequilibrium Candidate Monte Carlo, J Phys Chem B, 122, 5579, 10.1021/acs.jpcb.7b11820 · DOI
  49. 10.1021/bi001351t · DOI
  50. 2018, Frequency adaptive metadynamics for the calculation of rare-event kinetics, The Journal of Chemical Physics, 149, 072309, 10.1063/1.5024679 · DOI
  51. 10.1021/ct060037v · DOI
  52. 10.1016/S0022-2836(02)00777-5 · DOI · Paper page
  53. 10.1016/j.ymeth.2010.06.002 · DOI · Paper page
  54. G. R. Bowman , V. S. Pande , F. Noé , An Introduction to Markov State Models and Their Application to Long Timescale Molecular Simulation, Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology (Springer Science & Business Media, 2014), vol. 797. · DOI
  55. 10.1063/1.3565032 · DOI · Paper page
  56. 10.1021/ja0119806 · DOI
  57. 10.1021/ci100214a · DOI
  58. 2016, Modelling proteins’ hidden conformations to predict antibiotic resistance, Nature Communications, 7, 12965, 10.1038/ncomms12965 · DOI
  59. 10.1080/08927022.2015.1121541 · DOI
  60. 10.1021/ct400341p · DOI
  61. 10.1021/acs.jctc.5b00743 · DOI
  62. 10.1371/journal.pone.0075992 · DOI
  63. 10.1073/pnas.1500806112 · DOI
  64. 10.1002/prot.22711 · DOI
  65. 10.1063/1.445869 · DOI
  66. 10.1002/jcc.21758 · DOI
  67. 10.1021/ct300284c · DOI
  68. 2016, Localization of Millisecond Dynamics: Dihedral Entropy from Accelerated MD, J Chem Theory Comput, 12, 3449, 10.1021/acs.jctc.6b00231 · DOI
  69. 10.1021/ct400314y · DOI
  70. 10.1063/1.464397 · DOI
  71. 10.1063/1.432526 · DOI · Paper page
  72. 10.1063/1.448118 · DOI
  73. 10.1016/0021-9991(77)90098-5 · DOI
  74. 10.1021/ct400341p · DOI
  75. 10.1021/ct500090q · DOI
  76. 10.1021/acs.jctc.5b00743 · DOI
  77. 10.1063/1.3565032 · DOI · Paper page
  78. 10.1038/nchem.1954 · DOI · Paper page
  79. 10.1006/jmbi.1998.2401 · DOI
  80. 10.1016/0022-2836(82)90153-X · DOI
  81. 1995, Polyelectrolyte electrostatics: Salt dependence, entropic, and enthalpic contributions to free energy in the nonlinear Poisson-Boltzmann model, Biopolymers: Original Research on Biomolecules, 36, 227, 10.1002/bip.360360210 · DOI
  82. 10.1002/jcc.540130412 · DOI
  83. 10.1021/ci100214a · DOI
  84. 10.1073/pnas.1500806112 · DOI
  85. 10.1021/bi00027a006 · DOI
  86. 10.1021/bi00027a007 · DOI
  87. 2016, Hydrogen Bonding of 1,2-Azaborines in the Binding Cavity of T4 Lysozyme Mutants: Structures and Thermodynamics, J Am Chem Soc, 138, 12021, 10.1021/jacs.6b06566 · DOI
  88. 10.1002/1097-0134(20010201)42:2<279::AID-PROT150>3.0.CO;2-U · DOI
  89. 10.1016/j.jmb.2007.06.002 · DOI · Paper page
  90. 10.1016/j.jmb.2008.01.049 · DOI
  91. 10.1021/jm300687e · DOI · Paper page
  92. 10.1021/ci049714+ · DOI · Paper page

Metadata

Authors
Kamenik, A. S., Singh, I., Lak, P., Balius, T. E., Liedl, K. R., & Shoichet, B. K.
Affiliations
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • Universität Innsbruck (AT)
Corresponding author
  • Kamenik, Anna S.
  • Singh, Isha
  • Balius, Trent E.
  • Liedl, Klaus R.
  • Shoichet, Brian K.
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2021-04-20
Volume
118
Issue
36
ISSN
0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3196694646
Cited by
32
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 1
FWCI
2.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Austrian Science Fund (P3037, P30737)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM122481, R35GM122481)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Drug Discovery › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
Keywords
ligand binding prediction, binding site conformation, ligand discovery, enhanced sampling molecular dynamics, docking scoring functions
MeSH terms
Binding Sites, Kinetics, Ligands, Protein Binding, Protein Conformation, Proteins, Retrospective Studies, Thermodynamics, Crystallography, X-Ray, Molecular Dynamics Simulation, Molecular Docking Simulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review