PreprintCited by 5COVID-19 Clinical Research StudiesSARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchCOVID-19 epidemiological studies

Risk factors associated with severe outcomes of COVID-19: A systematic rapid review to inform national guidance on vaccine prioritization in Canada

Open access
Gates, Michelle, Pillay, Jennifer, Wingert, Aireen, Guitard, Samantha, Rahman, Sholeh, Zakher, Bernadette, Gates, Allison, Hartling, Lisa·2021·medRxiv

Abstract

Background: To inform vaccine prioritization guidance in Canada, we systematically reviewed evidence on the magnitude of association between risk factors and severe outcomes of COVID-19. The urgent nature of this review necessitated an adapted methodology, which may serve as an exemplar for reviews undertaken under strict timelines. Methods: We updated our existing review by searching online databases and websites for cohort studies providing multivariate adjusted associations. After piloting, one author screened studies and extracted data. Two authors estimated the magnitude of association between exposures and outcomes as little-to-no (odds, risk, or hazard ratio <2.0, or >0.50 for reduction), large (2.0-3.9, or 0.50-0.26 for reduction), or very large (≥4.0, or ≤0.25 for reduction), and rated the evidence certainty using GRADE. Results: Of 11,734 unique records we included 134 reports. There is probably (moderate certainty) at least a large increase in mortality from COVID-19 among people aged 60-69 vs. <60 years (11 studies, n=517,217), with ≥2 vs. no comorbidities (4 studies, n=189,608), and for people with (vs. without): Down syndrome (1 study, n>8 million), type 1 and 2 diabetes (1 study, n>8 million), end-stage kidney disease (1 study, n>8 million), motor neuron disease, multiple sclerosis, myasthenia gravis, or Huntington’s disease (as a grouping; 1 study, n>8 million). The magnitude of association with mortality is probably very large for Down syndrome and may (low certainty) be very large for age 60-69 years, and diabetes. There is probably little-to-no increase in severe outcomes with several cardiovascular and respiratory conditions, and for adult males vs. females. Conclusion: There is strong evidence to support at least a large increase in mortality from COVID-19 among older adults aged 60 to 69 years versus <60 years; people having two or more versus no comorbidities; and for people affected by several pre-existing conditions. The methodology employed in this review may provide an important exemplar for future syntheses undertaken under urgent timelines. Systematic review registration: PROSPERO #CRD42021230185.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2021.04.23.21256014

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Inadequate efforts were made to prioritise health and safety of these workers, first in workplace precautions and later in reducing barriers to vaccine access.

    “Inadequate efforts were made to prioritise the health and safety of these workers, first in requiring precautions in their workplaces, and later in reducing structural barriers to accessing vaccines when they became available.”
  • Groups disproportionately affected include people with comorbid conditions, immunocompromised people, people with disabilities or mental disorders, residents of congregant settings, and essential workers.

    “Other groups that have been disproportionately affected include people with comorbid medical conditions, particularly those with immunocompromised status; people living with physical disabilities or mental disorders; residents of congregant settings; and essential workers.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gates, M., Pillay, J., Wingert, A., Guitard, S., Rahman, S., Zakher, B., Gates, A., & Hartling, L.
Affiliations
University of Alberta (CA)
Corresponding author
Gates, Michelle
Venue
medRxiv
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2021-04-26
OpenAlex
W3158882463
Cited by
5
References
6
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
medRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › COVID-19 epidemiological studies
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, risk factors, severe outcomes, COVID-19 mortality, vaccine prioritization, older adults, comorbidities, Down syndrome, diabetes mellitus, end-stage renal disease, neuromuscular disorders, sex differences

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review