The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A deep generative model of 3D single-cell organization
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009155 · Paper page
Abstract
1 We introduce a framework for end-to-end integrative modeling of 3D single-cell multi-channel fluorescent image data of diverse subcellular structures. We employ stacked conditional β -variational autoencoders to first learn a latent representation of cell morphology, and then learn a latent representation of subcellular structure localization which is conditioned on the learned cell morphology. Our model is flexible and can be trained on images of arbitrary subcellular structures and at varying degrees of sparsity and reconstruction fidelity. We train our full model on 3D cell image data and explore design trade-offs in the 2D setting. Once trained, our model can be used to impute structures in cells where they were not imaged and to quantify the variation in the location of all subcellular structures by generating plausible instantiations of each structure in arbitrary cell geometries. We apply our trained model to a small drug perturbation screen to demonstrate its applicability to new data. We show how the latent representations of drugged cells differ from unperturbed cells as expected by on-target effects of the drugs. 2 Author summary: It’s impossible to acquire all the information we want about every cell we’re interested in in a single experiment. Even just limiting ourselves to imaging, we can only image a small set of subcellular structures in each cell. If we are interested in integrating those images into a holistic picture of cellular organization directly from data, there are a number of approaches one might take. Here, we leverage the fact that of the three channels we image in each cell, two stay the same across the data set; these two channels assess the cell’s shape and nuclear morphology. Given these two reference channels, we learn a model of cell and nuclear morphology, and then use this as a reference frame in which to learn a representation of the localization of each subcellular structure as measured by the third channel. We use β-variational autoencoders to learn representations of both the reference channels and representations of each subcellular structure (conditioned on the reference channels of the cell in which it was imaged). Since these models are both probabilistic and generative, we can use them to understand the variation in the data from which they were trained, to generate instantiations of new cell morphologies, and to generate imputations of structures in real cell images to create an integrated model of subcellular organization.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 36
- 10.1042/BST0330535 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature13302 · DOI · Paper page
- 2007, Automated learning of generative models for subcellular location: Building blocks for systems biology, Cytometry Part A, 71A, 978, 10.1002/cyto.a.20487 · DOI
- 2011, Image-derived, three-dimensional generative models of cellular organization, Cytometry Part A, 79A, 383, 10.1002/cyto.a.21066 · DOI
- Majarian TD , Cao-Berg I , Ruan X , Murphy RF. CellOrganizer: Learning and Using Cell Geometries for Spatial Cell Simulations. In: Modeling Biomolecular Site Dynamics. Springer; 2019. p. 251–264. · DOI
- 2016, Unbiased rare event sampling in spatial stochastic systems biology models using a weighted ensemble of trajectories, PLoS computational biology, 12, e1004611, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004611 · DOI
- 2020, Applications and Challenges of Machine Learning to Enable Realistic Cellular Simulations, Frontiers in Physics, 7, 247, 10.3389/fphy.2019.00247 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/17.12.1213 · DOI
- 10.1186/gb-2006-7-10-r100 · DOI
- 2012, PhenoRipper: software for rapidly profiling microscopy images, Nature Methods, 9, 635, 10.1038/nmeth.2097 · DOI
- Chen J , Ding L , Viana MP , Hendershott MC , Yang R , Mueller IA , et al. The Allen Cell Structure Segmenter: a new open source toolkit for segmenting 3D intracellular structures in fluorescence microscopy images. bioRxiv. 2018; p. 491035. · DOI · Paper page
- 2016, Deep Learning Automates the Quantitative Analysis of Individual Cells in Live-Cell Imaging Experiments, PLOS Computational Biology, 12, e1005177, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005177 · DOI · Paper page
- 2018, Label-free prediction of three-dimensional fluorescence images from transmitted-light microscopy, Nature methods, 15, 917, 10.1038/s41592-018-0111-2 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.cell.2018.03.040 · DOI · Paper page
- 2018, Content-aware image restoration: pushing the limits of fluorescence microscopy, Nature methods, 15, 1090, 10.1038/s41592-018-0216-7 · DOI
- 10.1038/nbt.4106 · DOI
- 2019, Deep learning neural networks highly predict very early onset of pluripotent stem cell differentiation, Stem cell reports, 12, 845, 10.1016/j.stemcr.2019.02.004 · DOI
- 2017, Reconstructing cell cycle and disease progression using deep learning, Nature communications, 8, 1
- Kimmel JC , Brack AS , Marshall WF. Deep convolutional and recurrent neural networks for cell motility discrimination and prediction. bioRxiv. 2019; p. 159202.
- 2019, Learning unsupervised feature representations for single cell microscopy images with paired cell inpainting, PLoS computational biology, 15, e1007348, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007348 · DOI
- 2013, Auto-encoding variational bayes, arXiv preprint
- 2017, Fixing a broken ELBO, arXiv preprint
- 2017, beta-VAE: Learning Basic Visual Concepts with a Constrained Variational Framework, Iclr, 2, 6
- Sønderby CK , Raiko T , Maaløe L , Sønderby SK , Winther O. Ladder variational autoencoders. In: Advances in neural information processing systems; 2016. p. 3738–3746.
- 2017, Generative Modeling with Conditional Autoencoders: Building an Integrated Cell, arXiv preprint
- 10.1101/238378 · DOI
- Goldsborough P , Pawlowski N , Caicedo JC , Singh S , Carpenter A. CytoGAN: Generative Modeling of Cell Images. bioRxiv. 2017; p. 227645. · DOI
- Osokin A , Chessel A , Carazo Salas RE , Vaggi F. GANs for biological image synthesis. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision; 2017. p. 2233–2242. · DOI
- 2017, Progressive growing of gans for improved quality, stability, and variation, arXiv preprint
- Wang TC , Liu MY , Zhu JY , Tao A , Kautz J , Catanzaro B. High-resolution image synthesis and semantic manipulation with conditional gans. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition; 2018. p. 8798–8807. · DOI
- 2016, NIPS 2016 tutorial: Generative adversarial networks, arXiv preprint
- Hou X , Shen L , Sun K , Qiu G. Deep Feature Consistent Variational Autoencoder. CoRR. 2016;abs/1610.00291. · DOI
- 2018, Deep generative modeling for single-cell transcriptomics, Nature methods, 15, 1053, 10.1038/s41592-018-0229-2 · DOI · Paper page
- 2018, Spectral normalization for generative adversarial networks, arXiv preprint
- He K , Zhang X , Ren S , Sun J. Deep residual learning for image recognition. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition; 2016. p. 770–778. · DOI · Paper page
- 2014, Adam: A method for stochastic optimization, arXiv preprint
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Integrated intracellular organization and its variations in human iPS cells
Viana, M. P., Chen, J., Knijnenburg, T. A., Vasan, R., Yan, C., Arakaki, J. E., Bailey, M., Berry, B., Borensztejn, A., Brown, E. M., et al. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-022-05563-7 · Cited by 132
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Donovan-Maiye, R. M., Brown, J. M., Chan, C. K., Ding, L., Yan, C., Gaudreault, N., Theriot, J. A., Maleckar, M. M., Knijnenburg, T. A., & Johnson, G. R.
- Affiliations
- Allen Institute for Cell Science (US)
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
- Corresponding author
- Knijnenburg, Theo A.
- ORCID
- Venue
- PLoS Computational Biology
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2021-06-09
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- e1009155-e1009155
- ISSN
- 1553-734X (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC8797242
- OpenAlex
- W4205199447
- Cited by
- 44
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 5
- FWCI
- 3.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- PLoS Computational Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Cell Image Analysis Techniques
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques
- Keywords
- conditional variational autoencoder, cell morphology, latent representations
- MeSH terms
- Cell Nucleus, Cells, Cultured, Humans, Microscopy, Fluorescence, Models, Biological, Computational Biology, Imaging, Three-Dimensional, Intracellular Space, Cell Shape, Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells, Single-Cell Analysis
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review