PreprintCited by 44Cell Image Analysis TechniquesSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomicsAdvanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A deep generative model of 3D single-cell organization

Open access

Preprint — published as 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009155 · Paper page

Abstract

1 We introduce a framework for end-to-end integrative modeling of 3D single-cell multi-channel fluorescent image data of diverse subcellular structures. We employ stacked conditional β -variational autoencoders to first learn a latent representation of cell morphology, and then learn a latent representation of subcellular structure localization which is conditioned on the learned cell morphology. Our model is flexible and can be trained on images of arbitrary subcellular structures and at varying degrees of sparsity and reconstruction fidelity. We train our full model on 3D cell image data and explore design trade-offs in the 2D setting. Once trained, our model can be used to impute structures in cells where they were not imaged and to quantify the variation in the location of all subcellular structures by generating plausible instantiations of each structure in arbitrary cell geometries. We apply our trained model to a small drug perturbation screen to demonstrate its applicability to new data. We show how the latent representations of drugged cells differ from unperturbed cells as expected by on-target effects of the drugs. 2 Author summary: It’s impossible to acquire all the information we want about every cell we’re interested in in a single experiment. Even just limiting ourselves to imaging, we can only image a small set of subcellular structures in each cell. If we are interested in integrating those images into a holistic picture of cellular organization directly from data, there are a number of approaches one might take. Here, we leverage the fact that of the three channels we image in each cell, two stay the same across the data set; these two channels assess the cell’s shape and nuclear morphology. Given these two reference channels, we learn a model of cell and nuclear morphology, and then use this as a reference frame in which to learn a representation of the localization of each subcellular structure as measured by the third channel. We use β-variational autoencoders to learn representations of both the reference channels and representations of each subcellular structure (conditioned on the reference channels of the cell in which it was imaged). Since these models are both probabilistic and generative, we can use them to understand the variation in the data from which they were trained, to generate instantiations of new cell morphologies, and to generate imputations of structures in real cell images to create an integrated model of subcellular organization.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2021.06.09.447725

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. 10.1042/BST0330535 · DOI
  2. 10.1038/nature13302 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 2007, Automated learning of generative models for subcellular location: Building blocks for systems biology, Cytometry Part A, 71A, 978, 10.1002/cyto.a.20487 · DOI
  4. 2011, Image-derived, three-dimensional generative models of cellular organization, Cytometry Part A, 79A, 383, 10.1002/cyto.a.21066 · DOI
  5. Majarian TD , Cao-Berg I , Ruan X , Murphy RF. CellOrganizer: Learning and Using Cell Geometries for Spatial Cell Simulations. In: Modeling Biomolecular Site Dynamics. Springer; 2019. p. 251–264. · DOI
  6. 2016, Unbiased rare event sampling in spatial stochastic systems biology models using a weighted ensemble of trajectories, PLoS computational biology, 12, e1004611, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004611 · DOI
  7. 2020, Applications and Challenges of Machine Learning to Enable Realistic Cellular Simulations, Frontiers in Physics, 7, 247, 10.3389/fphy.2019.00247 · DOI
  8. 10.1093/bioinformatics/17.12.1213 · DOI
  9. 10.1186/gb-2006-7-10-r100 · DOI
  10. 2012, PhenoRipper: software for rapidly profiling microscopy images, Nature Methods, 9, 635, 10.1038/nmeth.2097 · DOI
  11. Chen J , Ding L , Viana MP , Hendershott MC , Yang R , Mueller IA , et al. The Allen Cell Structure Segmenter: a new open source toolkit for segmenting 3D intracellular structures in fluorescence microscopy images. bioRxiv. 2018; p. 491035. · DOI · Paper page
  12. 2016, Deep Learning Automates the Quantitative Analysis of Individual Cells in Live-Cell Imaging Experiments, PLOS Computational Biology, 12, e1005177, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005177 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 2018, Label-free prediction of three-dimensional fluorescence images from transmitted-light microscopy, Nature methods, 15, 917, 10.1038/s41592-018-0111-2 · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1016/j.cell.2018.03.040 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 2018, Content-aware image restoration: pushing the limits of fluorescence microscopy, Nature methods, 15, 1090, 10.1038/s41592-018-0216-7 · DOI
  16. 10.1038/nbt.4106 · DOI
  17. 2019, Deep learning neural networks highly predict very early onset of pluripotent stem cell differentiation, Stem cell reports, 12, 845, 10.1016/j.stemcr.2019.02.004 · DOI
  18. 2017, Reconstructing cell cycle and disease progression using deep learning, Nature communications, 8, 1
  19. Kimmel JC , Brack AS , Marshall WF. Deep convolutional and recurrent neural networks for cell motility discrimination and prediction. bioRxiv. 2019; p. 159202.
  20. 2019, Learning unsupervised feature representations for single cell microscopy images with paired cell inpainting, PLoS computational biology, 15, e1007348, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007348 · DOI
  21. 2013, Auto-encoding variational bayes, arXiv preprint
  22. 2017, Fixing a broken ELBO, arXiv preprint
  23. 2017, beta-VAE: Learning Basic Visual Concepts with a Constrained Variational Framework, Iclr, 2, 6
  24. Sønderby CK , Raiko T , Maaløe L , Sønderby SK , Winther O. Ladder variational autoencoders. In: Advances in neural information processing systems; 2016. p. 3738–3746.
  25. 2017, Generative Modeling with Conditional Autoencoders: Building an Integrated Cell, arXiv preprint
  26. 10.1101/238378 · DOI
  27. Goldsborough P , Pawlowski N , Caicedo JC , Singh S , Carpenter A. CytoGAN: Generative Modeling of Cell Images. bioRxiv. 2017; p. 227645. · DOI
  28. Osokin A , Chessel A , Carazo Salas RE , Vaggi F. GANs for biological image synthesis. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision; 2017. p. 2233–2242. · DOI
  29. 2017, Progressive growing of gans for improved quality, stability, and variation, arXiv preprint
  30. Wang TC , Liu MY , Zhu JY , Tao A , Kautz J , Catanzaro B. High-resolution image synthesis and semantic manipulation with conditional gans. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition; 2018. p. 8798–8807. · DOI
  31. 2016, NIPS 2016 tutorial: Generative adversarial networks, arXiv preprint
  32. Hou X , Shen L , Sun K , Qiu G. Deep Feature Consistent Variational Autoencoder. CoRR. 2016;abs/1610.00291. · DOI
  33. 2018, Deep generative modeling for single-cell transcriptomics, Nature methods, 15, 1053, 10.1038/s41592-018-0229-2 · DOI · Paper page
  34. 2018, Spectral normalization for generative adversarial networks, arXiv preprint
  35. He K , Zhang X , Ren S , Sun J. Deep residual learning for image recognition. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition; 2016. p. 770–778. · DOI · Paper page
  36. 2014, Adam: A method for stochastic optimization, arXiv preprint

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Donovan-Maiye, R. M., Brown, J. M., Chan, C. K., Ding, L., Yan, C., Gaudreault, N., Theriot, J. A., Maleckar, M. M., Knijnenburg, T. A., & Johnson, G. R.
Affiliations
  • Allen Institute for Cell Science (US)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Knijnenburg, Theo A.
Venue
PLoS Computational Biology
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2021-06-09
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
e1009155-e1009155
ISSN
1553-734X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4205199447
Cited by
44
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 5
FWCI
3.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • PLoS Computational Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Cell Image Analysis Techniques
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Advanced Fluorescence Microscopy Techniques
Keywords
conditional variational autoencoder, cell morphology, latent representations
MeSH terms
Cell Nucleus, Cells, Cultured, Humans, Microscopy, Fluorescence, Models, Biological, Computational Biology, Imaging, Three-Dimensional, Intracellular Space, Cell Shape, Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells, Single-Cell Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review