PreprintCited by 1,640SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchCOVID-19 Clinical Research StudiesVaccine Coverage and Hesitancy

Six Month Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine

Open access
Thomas, Stephen J., Moreira, Edson D., Kitchin, Nicholas, Absalon, Judith, Gurtman, Alejandra, Lockhart, Stephen, Perez, John L., Pérez Marc, Gonzalo +25 more·2021·New England Journal of Medicine

Preprint — published as 10.1056/nejmoa2110345 · Paper page

Abstract

Background: BNT162b2 is a lipid nanoparticle-formulated, nucleoside-modified RNA vaccine encoding a prefusion-stabilized, membrane-anchored SARS-CoV-2 full-length spike protein. BNT162b2 is highly efficacious against COVID-19 and is currently authorized for emergency use or conditional approval worldwide. At the time of authorization, data beyond 2 months post-vaccination were unavailable. Methods: In an ongoing, placebo-controlled, observer-blinded, multinational, pivotal efficacy study, 44,165 ≥16-year-old participants and 2,264 12-15-year-old participants were randomized to receive 2 doses, 21 days apart, of 30 µg BNT162b2 or placebo. Study endpoints reported here are vaccine efficacy (VE) against laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 and safety data, both up to 6 months post-vaccination. Results: BNT162b2 continued to be safe and well tolerated. Few participants had adverse events leading to study withdrawal. VE against COVID-19 was 91% (95% CI 89.0-93.2) through up to 6 months of follow-up, among evaluable participants and irrespective of previous SARS-CoV-2 infection. VE of 86%-100% was seen across countries and in populations with diverse characteristics of age, sex, race/ethnicity, and COVID-19 risk factors in participants without evidence of previous SARS-CoV-2 infection. VE against severe disease was 97% (95% CI 80.3−99.9). In South Africa, where the SARS-CoV-2 variant of concern, B.1.351 (beta), was predominant, 100% (95% CI 53.5, 100.0) VE was observed. Conclusion: With up to 6 months of follow-up and despite a gradually declining trend in vaccine efficacy, BNT162b2 had a favorable safety profile and was highly efficacious in preventing COVID-19. ( ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04368728 )

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2021.07.28.21261159

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Vaccine-induced immunity remains effective at preventing severe disease, hospitalization, and death even at later time points when antibody levels may have declined.

    “Yet, vaccine-induced immunity remains effective at preventing severe disease, hospitalization, and death, even at later time points when antibody levels may have declined (10–12).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. Baraniuk C. What do we know about China's covid-19 vaccines? BMJ 2021;373:n912.
  2. Baraniuk C. Covid-19: What do we know about Sputnik V and other Russian vaccines? BMJ 2021;372:n743.
  3. Pardi N, Tuyishime S, Muramatsu H, et al. Expression kinetics of nucleoside-modified mRNA delivered in lipid nanoparticles to mice by various routes. J Control Release 2015;217:345-51.
  4. Karikó K, Muramatsu H, Welsh FA, et al. Incorporation of pseudouridine into mRNA yields superior nonimmunogenic vector with increased translational capacity and biological stability. Mol Ther 2008;16:1833-40.
  5. Wrapp D, Wang N, Corbett KS, et al. Cryo-EM structure of the 2019-nCoV spike in the prefusion conformation. Science 2020;367:1260-3.
  6. Liu Y, Liu J, Xia H, et al. Neutralizing Activity of BNT162b2-Elicited Serum. N Engl J Med 2021;384:1466-1468.
  7. Haas EJ, Angulo FJ, McLaughlin JM, et al. Impact and effectiveness of mRNA BNT162b2 vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 infections and COVID-19 cases, hospitalisations, and deaths following a nationwide vaccination campaign in Israel: an observational study using national surveillance data. Lancet 2021;397:1819-29.
  8. Abu-Raddad LJ, Chemaitelly H, Butt AA, National Study Group for C-V. Effectiveness of the BNT162b2 Covid-19 Vaccine against the B.1.1.7 and B.1.351 Variants. N Engl J Med 2021;385:187-189.
  9. Lopez Bernal J, Andrews N, Gower C, et al. Effectiveness of the Pfizer-BioNTech and Oxford- AstraZeneca vaccines on covid-19 related symptoms, hospital admissions, and mortality in older adults in England: test negative case-control study. BMJ 2021;373:n1088.
  10. Vasileiou E, Simpson CR, Shi T, et al. Interim findings from first-dose mass COVID-19 vaccination roll-out and COVID-19 hospital admissions in Scotland: a national prospective cohort study. Lancet 2021;397:1646-57.
  11. Walsh EE, Frenck RW, Jr., Falsey AR, et al. Safety and Immunogenicity of Two RNA-Based Covid-19 Vaccine Candidates. N Engl J Med 2020;383:2439-50.
  12. Tauzin A, Nayrac M, Benlarbi M, et al. A single BNT162b2 mRNA dose elicits antibodies with Fc-mediated effector functions and boost pre-existing humoral and T cell responses. bioRxiv [Preprint]. 2021 Mar 18:2021.03.18.435972.
  13. Gallagher KME, Leick MB, Larson RC, et al. SARS -CoV-2 T-cell immunity to variants of concern following vaccination. bioRxiv [Preprint]. 2021:2021.05.03.442455.
  14. Painter MM, Mathew D, Goel RR, et al. Rapid induction of antigen-specific CD4<sup>+</sup> T cells guides coordinated humoral and cellular immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination. bioRxiv 2021:2021.04.21.440862.
  15. Xie X, Liu Y, Liu J, et al. Neutralization of SARS-CoV-2 spike 69/70 deletion, E484K and N501Y variants by BNT162b2 vaccine-elicited sera. Nat Med 2021;27:620-1.
  16. Zou J, Xie X, Fontes-Garfias CR, et al. The effect of SARS-CoV-2 D614G mutation on BNT162b2 vaccine-elicited neutralization. NPJ Vaccines 2021;6:44.
  17. Muik A, Wallisch AK, Sänger B, et al. Neutralization of SARS-CoV-2 lineage B.1.1.7 pseudovirus by BNT162b2 vaccine-elicited human sera. Science 2021;371:1152-3.
  18. Dagan N, Barda N, Kepten E, et al. BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine in a Nationwide Mass Vaccination Setting. N Engl J Med 2021;384:1412-23.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Thomas, S. J., Moreira, E. D., Kitchin, N., Absalon, J., Gurtman, A., Lockhart, S., Perez, J. L., Pérez Marc, G., Polack, F. P., Zerbini, C., Bailey, R., Swanson, K. A., Xu, X., Roychoudhury, S., Koury, K., Bouguermouh, S., Kalina, W. V., Cooper, D., Frenck, R. W., Hammitt, L. L., Türeci, Ö., Nell, H., Schaefer, A., Ünal, S., Yang, Q., Liberator, P., Tresnan, D. B., Mather, S., Dormitzer, P. R., Şahin, U., Gruber, W. C., Jansen, K. U., & C4591001 Clinical Trial Group
Affiliations
Pfizer (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Absalon, Judith
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2021-07-28
Volume
385
Issue
19
Pages
1761-1773
ISSN
0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3200157219
Cited by
1,640
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 57 · 2025: 141 · 2024: 212 · 2023: 343 · 2022: 654 · 2021: 229 · 2020: 1
FWCI
114.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • medRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Pfizer
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
  • Social Sciences › Health › Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Keywords
BNT162b2, COVID-19 vaccines, SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, mRNA vaccines, lipid nanoparticle formulation, vaccine efficacy, vaccine safety, long-term follow-up, waning immunity, severe COVID-19 prevention, B.1.351 variant, emergency use authorization, children and adolescents, adverse events, trial discontinuation
MeSH terms
Immunogenicity, Vaccine, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 Vaccines, BNT162 Vaccine, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antibodies, Viral, Child, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Immunization, Secondary, Male, Middle Aged, Incidence, Single-Blind Method, Treatment Outcome, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review