Cited by 155SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchVaccine Coverage and HesitancyCOVID-19 epidemiological studies

Two-Dose Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Vaccine Effectiveness With Mixed Schedules and Extended Dosing Intervals: Test-Negative Design Studies From British Columbia and Quebec, Canada

Open access
Skowronski, Danuta M, Febriani, Yossi, Ouakki, Manale, Setayeshgar, Solmaz, El Adam, Shiraz, Zou, Macy, Talbot, Denis, Prystajecky, Natalie +23 more·2022·Clinical Infectious Diseases

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Background: The Canadian coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) immunization strategy deferred second doses and allowed mixed schedules. We compared 2-dose vaccine effectiveness (VE) by vaccine type (mRNA and/or ChAdOx1), interval between doses, and time since second dose in 2 of Canada’s larger provinces. Methods: Two-dose VE against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection or hospitalization among adults ≥18 years, including due to Alpha, Gamma, and Delta variants of concern (VOCs), was assessed ≥14 days postvaccination by test-negative design studies separately conducted in British Columbia and Quebec, Canada, between 30 May and 27 November (epi-weeks 22–47) 2021. Results: In both provinces, all homologous or heterologous mRNA and/or ChAdOx1 2-dose schedules were associated with ≥90% reduction in SARS-CoV-2 hospitalization risk for ≥7 months. With slight decline from a peak of >90%, VE against infection was ≥80% for ≥6 months following homologous mRNA vaccination, lower by ∼10% when both doses were ChAdOx1 but comparably high following heterologous ChAdOx1 + mRNA receipt. Findings were similar by age group, sex, and VOC. VE was significantly higher with longer 7–8-week versus manufacturer-specified 3–4-week intervals between mRNA doses. Conclusions: Two doses of any mRNA and/or ChAdOx1 combination gave substantial and sustained protection against SARS-CoV-2 hospitalization, spanning Delta-dominant circulation. ChAdOx1 VE against infection was improved by heterologous mRNA series completion. A 7–8-week interval between first and second doses improved mRNA VE and may be the optimal schedule outside periods of intense epidemic surge. Findings support interchangeability and extended intervals between SARS-CoV-2 vaccine doses, with potential global implications for low-coverage areas and, going forward, for children.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/cid/ciac290

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [13]Andrews N, Tessier E, Stowe J, et al Vaccine effectiveness and duration of protection of Comirnaty, Vaxzevria and Spikevax against mild and severe COVID-19 in the UK. Knowledgehub [preprint], 15 September 2021. Available at: https://khub.net/documents/135939561/338928724/Vaccine+effectiveness+and+duration+of+protection+of+covid+vaccines+against+mild+and+severe+COVID-19+in+the+UK.pdf/10dcd99c-0441-0403-dfd8-11ba2c6f5801. Accessed 16 October 2021.
  2. [22]Atmar RL, Lyke KE, Deming ME, et al Homologous and heterologous Covid-19 booster vaccinations. N Engl J Med 2022; 386: 1046– 57. 35081293 PMC8820244
  3. [31]Hall V, Foulkes S, Insalata F, et al Effectiveness and durability of protection against future SARS-CoV-2 infection conferred by COVID-19 vaccination and previous infection; findings from the UK SIREN prospective cohort study of healthcare workers March 2020 to September 2021. medRxiv [preprint], 1 December 2021. Available at: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.11.29.21267006v1. Accessed 21 March 2022. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Skowronski, D. M., Febriani, Y., Ouakki, M., Setayeshgar, S., El Adam, S., Zou, M., Talbot, D., Prystajecky, N., Tyson, J. R., Gilca, R., Brousseau, N., Deceuninck, G., Galanis, E., Fjell, C. D., Sbihi, H., Fortin, E., Barkati, S., Sauvageau, C., Naus, M., Patrick, D. M., Henry, B., Hoang, L. M. N., De Wals, P., Garenc, C., Carignan, A., Drolet, M., Jassem, A. N., Sadarangani, M., Brisson, M., Krajden, M., & De Serres, G.
Affiliations
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • Centre hospitalier universitaire de Québec (CA)
  • Institut National de Sante Publique du Québec, Biological and Occupational Risks , Quebec City, Quebec , Canada
  • BC Centre for Disease Control (CA)
  • BC Centre for Disease Control, Communicable Diseases and Immunization Services , Vancouver, British Columbia , Canada
  • BC Centre for Disease Control, Public Health Laboratory , Vancouver, British Columbia , Canada
  • McGill University Health Centre (CA)
  • Ministry of Health (CA)
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Québec-Université Laval Research Center , Quebec City, Quebec , Canada
  • Université de Sherbrooke (CA)
Corresponding author
Skowronski, Danuta M
Venue
Clinical Infectious Diseases
Published
2022-04-19
Volume
75
Issue
11
Pages
1980-1992
ISSN
  • 1058-4838 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-6591
OpenAlex
W4226124668
Cited by
155
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 69 · 2021: 9
FWCI
17.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Infectious Diseases (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • medRxiv (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Children's Hospital Foundation
  • BC Children's Hospital
  • Canadian Child Health Clinician Scientist Program
  • Michael Smith Health Research BC
  • British Columbia Centre for Disease Control
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Social Sciences › Health › Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Modeling and Simulation › COVID-19 epidemiological studies
Keywords
COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness, SARS-CoV-2, two-dose vaccine schedule, extended dosing interval, heterologous vaccination, mRNA vaccines, ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine, SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern, Delta variant, test-negative design, vaccine interchangeability, British Columbia, Quebec
MeSH terms
COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19 Vaccines, Vaccine Efficacy, Adult, British Columbia, Child, Humans, Quebec, RNA, Messenger

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review