PreprintCited by 12Protein Structure and DynamicsGenomics and Phylogenetic StudiesBioinformatics and Genomic Networks

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Correlations from structure and phylogeny combine constructively in the inference of protein partners from sequences

Open access
Gerardos, Andonis, Dietler, Nicola, Bitbol, Anne-Florence·2021·PLoS Computational Biology

Preprint — published as 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010147

Abstract

Inferring protein-protein interactions from sequences is an important task in computational biology. Recent methods based on Direct Coupling Analysis (DCA) or Mutual Information (MI) allow to find interaction partners among paralogs of two protein families. Does successful inference mainly rely on correlations from structural contacts or from phylogeny, or both? Do these two types of signal combine constructively or hinder each other? To address these questions, we generate and analyze synthetic data produced using a minimal model that allows us to control the amounts of structural constraints and phylogeny. We show that correlations from these two sources combine constructively to increase the performance of partner inference by DCA or MI. Furthermore, signal from phylogeny can rescue partner inference when signal from contacts becomes less informative, including in the realistic case where inter-protein contacts are restricted to a small subset of sites. We also demonstrate that DCA-inferred couplings between non-contact pairs of sites improve partner inference in the presence of strong phylogeny, while deteriorating it otherwise. Moreover, restricting to non-contact pairs of sites preserves inference performance in the presence of strong phylogeny. In a natural data set, as well as in realistic synthetic data based on it, we find that non-contact pairs of sites contribute positively to partner inference performance, and that restricting to them preserves performance, evidencing an important role of phylogeny. Author summary: In protein sequence data, the amino acid usages at different sites of a protein or of two interacting proteins can be correlated because of functional constraints. For instance, the need to maintain physicochemical complementarity among two sites that are in contact in the three-dimensional structure of a protein complex causes such correlations. However, correlations can also arise due to shared evolutionary history, even in the absence of any functional constraint. While these phylogenetic correlations are known to obscure the inference of structural contacts, we show, using controlled synthetic data, that correlations from structure and phylogeny combine constructively to allow the inference of protein partners among paralogs using just sequences. We also show that pairs of amino acids that are not in contact in the structure have a major impact on partner inference in a natural data set and in realistic synthetic ones. These findings explain the success of methods based on pairwise maximum-entropy models or on information theory at predicting protein partners from sequences among paralogs.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2021.11.22.469574

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 84

  1. 10.1038/nbt.2831 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 1999, Correlated mutations in models of protein sequences: phylogenetic and structural effects, In: Statistics in molecular biology and genetics - IMS Lecture Notes - Monograph Series, 33, 236
  3. 10.1038/msb4100203 · DOI
  4. 10.1103/PhysRev.106.620 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1073/pnas.0805923106 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1371/journal.pone.0028766 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1073/pnas.1111471108 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1073/pnas.1207864109 · DOI
  9. 10.1534/genetics.113.155861 · DOI
  10. 10.1073/pnas.1323734111 · DOI
  11. 10.1093/molbev/msw188 · DOI
  12. 10.1093/molbev/msv211 · DOI
  13. 10.1073/pnas.1913071117 · DOI
  14. 10.1073/pnas.1315625110 · DOI
  15. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004262 · DOI
  16. 10.1126/science.aba3304 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1371/journal.pone.0019729 · DOI
  18. 10.1371/journal.pone.0092721 · DOI
  19. 10.7554/eLife.02030 · DOI · Paper page
  20. 10.7554/eLife.03430 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1073/pnas.1403770111 · DOI
  22. 10.1038/srep13652 · DOI
  23. 10.1371/journal.pone.0149166 · DOI
  24. 10.1073/pnas.1606762113 · DOI
  25. 10.1073/pnas.1607570113 · DOI
  26. 10.1126/science.aaw6718 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 2021, Large-scale discovery of protein interactions at residue resolution using co-evolution calculated from genomic sequences, Nat Commun, 12, 1396, 10.1038/s41467-021-21636-z · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1038/nsb0295-171 · DOI
  29. 10.1016/j.cell.2009.07.038 · DOI
  30. 10.1073/pnas.1711913115 · DOI
  31. 1996, The coevolution of gene family trees, Trends Genet, 12, 364, 10.1016/S0168-9525(96)80020-5 · DOI
  32. 10.1006/jmbi.2000.3732 · DOI
  33. 10.1073/pnas.0609962104 · DOI
  34. 10.1016/j.febslet.2008.02.017 · DOI
  35. 10.1016/j.jmb.2008.09.078 · DOI
  36. 10.1093/molbev/msq144 · DOI
  37. 2012, The origins of the evolutionary signal used to predict protein-protein interactions, BMC Evol Biol, 12, 238, 10.1186/1471-2148-12-238 · DOI
  38. 10.1093/protein/14.9.609 · DOI
  39. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti1009 · DOI
  40. Bradde S , Braunstein A , Mahmoudi H , Tria F , Weigt M , Zecchina R. Aligning graphs and finding substructures by a cavity approach. EPL. 2010;89(3). · DOI
  41. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq137 · DOI
  42. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv102 · DOI
  43. 10.1073/pnas.96.8.4285 · DOI
  44. 2019, A multi-scale coevolutionary approach to predict interactions between protein domains, PLoS Comput Biol, 15, e1006891, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006891 · DOI
  45. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007553 · DOI
  46. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006401 · DOI
  47. 10.1103/PhysRevE.101.032413 · DOI
  48. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007179 · DOI
  49. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006526 · DOI
  50. 10.3390/e21111090 · DOI
  51. Rodriguez Horta E , Weigt M. On the effect of phylogenetic correlations in coevolution-based contact prediction in proteins. PLoS Comput Biol. 2021;17(5). · DOI
  52. 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0167 · DOI
  53. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm604 · DOI
  54. 2013, Improved contact prediction in proteins: using pseudolikelihoods to infer Potts models, Phys Rev E, 87, 012707, 10.1103/PhysRevE.87.012707 · DOI · Paper page
  55. Hockenberry AJ , Wilke CO . Phylogenetic weighting does little to improve the accuracy of evolutionary coupling analyses. Entropy. 2019;21(10). · DOI
  56. 2020, Coevolutionary Analysis of Protein Subfamilies by Sequence Reweight-ing, Entropy, 21, 1127
  57. 2022, Extracting phylogenetic dimensions of coevolution reveals hidden functional signals, Scientific Reports, 12, 820, 10.1038/s41598-021-04260-1 · DOI
  58. 2021, Computed structures of core eukaryotic protein complexes, Science, 374, 1340
  59. 10.1101/2021.10.04.463034 · DOI · Paper page
  60. 2022, Improved prediction of protein-protein interactions using AlphaFold2, Nat Commun, 13, 1265, 10.1038/s41467-022-28865-w · DOI · Paper page
  61. 10.1088/1361-6633/aa9965 · DOI
  62. 10.1073/pnas.1105315108 · DOI
  63. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003776 · DOI
  64. 2014, Fast pseudolikelihood maximization for direct-coupling analysis of protein structure from many homologous amino-acid sequences, J Comput Phys, 276, 341, 10.1016/j.jcp.2014.07.024 · DOI
  65. 10.1186/1471-2164-10-315 · DOI
  66. 10.1093/nar/gkq1023 · DOI
  67. 10.1093/molbev/msy007 · DOI
  68. 2021, Efficient generative modeling of protein sequences using simple autoregressive models, Nat Commun, 12, 5800, 10.1038/s41467-021-25756-4 · DOI
  69. 10.1371/journal.pone.0013124 · DOI
  70. 2017, Inverse statistical problems: from the inverse Ising problem to data science, Advances in Physics, 66, 197, 10.1080/00018732.2017.1341604 · DOI
  71. 1982, Convergence condition of the TAP equation for the infinite-ranged Ising spin glass model, J Phys A: Math Gen, 15, 1971, 10.1088/0305-4470/15/6/035 · DOI
  72. Fano R. Transmission of Information: A Statistical Theory of Communications. plambridge, MA: The MIT Press; 1961. · DOI
  73. 1990, Word association norms, mutual information, and lexicography, Comput Linguist, 16, 22
  74. Role F , Nadif M. Handling the impact of low frequency events on co-occurrence based measures of word similarity. In: Filipe J , Fred A , editors. Proceedings of the International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Information Retrieval (KDIR-2011). Scitepress; 2011. p. 218–223.
  75. 10.1002/nav.3800020109 · DOI · Paper page
  76. 10.1137/0105003 · DOI
  77. 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2 · DOI · Paper page
  78. 10.1073/pnas.1413575111 · DOI
  79. Ngampruetikorn V , Sachdeva V , Torrence J , Humplik J , Schwab DJ , Palmer SE . Inferring couplings in networks across order-disorder phase transitions. ArXiv Preprint; p. https://arxiv.org/abs/2106.02349. · arXiv
  80. 10.1007/s10955-011-0229-4 · DOI · Paper page
  81. Ewens WJ . Mathematical Population Genetics. Springer-Verlag; 1979.
  82. 10.1093/nar/28.1.235 · DOI · Paper page
  83. 2019, Revealing evolutionary constraints on proteins through sequence analysis, PLoS Comput Biol, 15, e1007010, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007010 · DOI
  84. 10.1016/j.cell.2009.08.032 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Gerardos, A., Dietler, N., & Bitbol, A.-F.
Affiliations
SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics (CH)
Corresponding author
Bitbol, Anne-Florence
Venue
PLoS Computational Biology
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2021-11-22
Volume
18
Issue
5
Pages
e1010147-e1010147
ISSN
1553-734X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3217241434
Cited by
12
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3
FWCI
0.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • PLoS Computational Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • European Commission (851173, HORIZON2020)
  • European Research Council (851173)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
Keywords
protein paralogs, direct coupling analysis, mutual information, structural contacts, phylogenetic signal, synthetic data, minimal models
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Phylogeny, Proteins, Computational Biology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review