The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
rrQNet: protein contact map quality estimation by deep evolutionary reconciliation
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1002/prot.26394
Abstract
Protein contact maps have proven to be a valuable tool in the deep learning revolution of protein structure prediction, ushering in the recent breakthrough by AlphaFold2. However, self-assessment of the quality of predicted structures are typically performed at the granularity of 3D coordinates as opposed to directly exploiting the rotation- and translation-invariant 2D contact maps. Here we present rrQNet, a deep learning method for self-assessment in 2D by contact map quality estimation. Our approach is based on the intuition that for a contact map to be of high quality, the residue pairs predicted to be in contact should be mutually consistent with the evolutionary context of the protein. The deep neural network architecture of rrQNet implements this intuition by cascading two deep modules—one encoding the evolutionary context and the other performing evolutionary reconciliation. The penultimate stage of rrQNet estimates the quality scores at the interacting residue-pair level, which are then aggregated for estimating the quality of a contact map. This design choice offers versatility at varied resolutions from individual residue pairs to full-fledged contact maps. Trained on multiple complementary sources of contact predictors, rrQNet facilitates generalizability across various contact maps. By rigorously testing using publicly available datasets and comparing against several in-house baseline approaches, we show that rrQNet accurately reproduces the true quality score of a predicted contact map and successfully distinguishes between accurate and inaccurate contact maps predicted by a wide variety of contact predictors. The open-source rrQNet software package is freely available at https://github.com/Bhattacharya-Lab/rrQNet .
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 43
- 10.1073/pnas.1821309116 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41586-019-1923-7 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1073/pnas.1914677117 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.abj8754 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/prot.26171 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41586-021-03828-1 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008753 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa455 · DOI
- 10.1145/3233547.3233570 · DOI
- 10.1109/CVPR.2016.512 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0028766 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/prot.26254 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/prot.24829 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41598-020-59834-2 · DOI
- 10.3389/fmolb.2021.643752 · DOI
- 10.1002/prot.25684 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007411 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.aah4043 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1109/CVPR.2016.90 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz863 · DOI
- 10.1111/ectj.12061 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz291 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu500 · DOI
- 10.1186/1471-2105-15-85 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr638 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu791 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.csbj.2018.10.009 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx781 · DOI
- 10.1002/prot.22934 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1103/PhysRevE.87.012707 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1214/009053606000000281 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx296 · DOI
- 2016, TensorFlow: Large-Scale Machine Learning on Heterogeneous Distributed Systems
- 2017, Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/bty341 · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gki524 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/nar/gkw1081 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu739 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41467-018-04964-5 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/prot.26248 · DOI
- 10.1101/2021.08.15.456425 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt211 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003889 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Roche, R., Bhattacharya, S., Shuvo, M. H., & Bhattacharya, D.
- Affiliations
- Virginia Tech (US)
- Florida Polytechnic University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Bhattacharya, Debswapna
- Venue
- Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2022-01-22
- Volume
- 90
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2023-2034
- ISSN
- 0887-3585 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC9633355
- OpenAlex
- W4283449823
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc-nd
- Locations
- Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics (publishedVersion, public-domain)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (2030722, 1942692)
- National Science Foundation of Sri Lanka (IIS-2030722, DBI‐1942692)
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R35GM138146)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Enzyme Structure and Function
- Keywords
- protein contact maps, evolutionary context, contact prediction, deep neural network, protein structure prediction
- MeSH terms
- Biological Evolution, Proteins, Software, Neural Networks, Computer, Computational Biology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review