The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
AlphaFold accurately predicts distinct conformations based on oligomeric state of a de novo designed protein
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1002/pro.4368 · Paper page
Abstract
Using the molecular modeling program Rosetta, we designed a de novo protein, called SEWN0.1, that binds the heterotrimeric G protein Gαq. The design is helical, well-folded, and primarily monomeric in solution at a concentration of 10 uM. However, when we solved the crystal structure of SEWN0.1, we observed a dimer in a conformation incompatible with binding Gαq. Unintentionally, we had designed a protein that adopts alternate conformations depending on its oligomeric state. Recently, there has been tremendous progress in the field of protein structure prediction as new methods in artificial intelligence have been used to predict structures with high accuracy. We were curious if the structure prediction method AlphaFold could predict the structure of SEWN0.1 and if the prediction depended on oligomeric state. When AlphaFold was used to predict the structure of monomeric SEWN0.1, it produced a model that resembles the Rosetta design model and is compatible with binding Gαq, but when used to predict the structure of a dimer, it predicted a conformation that closely resembles the SEWN0.1 crystal structure. AlphaFold’s ability to predict multiple conformations for a single protein sequence should be useful for engineering protein switches.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 23
- 2021, Highly accurate protein structure prediction for the human proteome, Nature, 596, 590, 10.1038/s41586-021-03828-1 · DOI · Paper page
- Mirdita M , Ovchinnikov S , Steinegger M (2021) ColabFold - Making protein folding accessible to all. bioRxiv:2021.08.15.456425. · DOI · Paper page
- Evans R , O’Neill M , Pritzel A , Antropova N , Senior A , Green T , Žídek A , Bates R , Blackwell S , Yim J , et al. (2021) Protein complex prediction with AlphaFold-Multimer. bioRxiv:2021.10.04.463034. · DOI · Paper page
- 2020, Oligomerization and Conformational Change Turn Monomeric β-Amyloid and Tau Proteins Toxic: Their Role in Alzheimer’s Pathogenesis, Molecules, 25, 1659, 10.3390/molecules25071659 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.bpj.2010.01.050 · DOI
- 10.1056/NEJMoa1000584 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature07586 · DOI
- 2021, Designer proteins that competitively inhibit Gαq by targeting its effector site, J. Biol. Chem, 297, 101348, 10.1016/j.jbc.2021.101348 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1193438 · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.jcim.8b00060 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.aad8036 · DOI
- 10.1371/journal.pone.0020161 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1115898108 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature19791 · DOI
- 2018, Distinguishing crystallographic from biological interfaces in protein complexes: role of intermolecular contacts and energetics for classification, BMC Bioinformatics, 19, 438, 10.1186/s12859-018-2414-9 · DOI
- Jendrusch M , Korbel JO , Sadiq SK (2021) AlphaDesign: A de novo protein design framework based on AlphaFold. bioRxiv:2021.10.11.463937. · DOI · Paper page
- Akdel M , Pires DE V , Pardo EP , Jänes J , Zalevsky AO , Mészáros B , Bryant P , Good LL , Laskowski RA , Pozzati G , et al. (2021) A structural biology community assessment of AlphaFold 2 applications. bioRxiv:2021.09.26.461876. · DOI · Paper page
- 2010, XDS. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D Biol, Crystallogr, 66, 125
- 10.1107/S0021889807021206 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1107/S0907444913027534 · DOI
- 10.1107/S0907444904019158 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1107/S0907444912001308 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1107/S0907444994003112 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Cummins, M. C., Jacobs, T. M., Teets, F. D., DiMaio, F., Tripathy, A., & Kuhlman, B.
- Affiliations
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
- University of Washington (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kuhlman, Brian
- Venue
- Protein Science
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2022-02-03
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- e4368-e4368
- ISSN
- 0961-8368 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC9207892
- OpenAlex
- W4283167332
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2
- FWCI
- 1.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Protein Science (publishedVersion)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health
- National Cancer Institute (P30CA016086)
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (T32GM007040, R35GM131923)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Enzyme Structure and Function
- Keywords
- AlphaFold, de novo protein design, oligomeric state, protein conformational polymorphism, protein dimerization, protein switches
- MeSH terms
- Amino Acid Sequence, Artificial Intelligence, Models, Molecular, Protein Conformation, Proteins
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review