The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Molecular mechanisms of spontaneous curvature and softening in complex lipid bilayer mixtures
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1016/j.bpj.2022.07.036 · Paper page
Abstract
Membrane reshaping is an essential biological process. The chemical composition of lipid membranes determines their mechanical properties, and thus the energetics of their shape. Hundreds of distinct lipid species make up native bilayers, and this diversity complicates efforts to uncover what compositional factors drive membrane stability in cells. Simplifying assumptions, therefore, are used to generate quantitative predictions of bilayer dynamics based on lipid composition. One assumption commonly used is that “per lipid” mechanical properties are both additive and constant — that they are an intrinsic property of lipids independent of the surrounding composition. Related to this, is the assumption that lipid bulkiness, or “shape” determines its curvature preference, independently of context. In this study, all-atom molecular dynamics simulations on three separate multi-lipid systems were used to explicitly test these assumptions, applying methodology recently developed to isolate properties of single lipids or nanometer-scale patches of lipids. The curvature preference of populations of lipid conformations were inferred from their redistribution on a dynamically fluctuating bilayer. Representative populations were extracted by both structural similarity and semi-automated hidden Markov model analysis. The curvature preferences of lipid dimers were then determined and compared to an additive model that combines the monomer curvature preference of both the individual lipids. In all three systems, we identified conformational subpopulations of lipid dimers that showed non-additive curvature preference, in each case mediated by a special chemical interaction (e.g., hydrogen bonding). Our study highlights the importance of specific chemical interactions between lipids in multicomponent bilayers and the impact of interactions on bilayer stiffness. We identify two mechanisms of bilayer softening: Diffusional softening , which is driven by the dynamic coupling between lipid distributions and membrane undulations, and conformational softening , which is driven by the inter-conversion between distinct dimeric conformations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Markov state models of biomolecular conformational dynamics
Chodera, J. D., & Noé, F. (2014) · Current Opinion in Structural Biology · doi:10.1016/j.sbi.2014.04.002 · Cited by 776
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 64
- 10.1038/nrm.2017.138 · DOI
- 10.1038/nri3859 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1097/MOL.0b013e328082e4d5 · DOI
- K. Mandal , “Review of PIP2 in cellular signaling, functions and diseases,” (2020). · DOI
- 10.1038/nrm2330 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.abb.2021.108921 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.plipres.2013.12.001 · DOI
- 2017, Biochim. Biophys. Acta - Mol. Cell Biol. Lipids, 1862, 1155
- 10.1038/s41589-020-0529-6 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jmb.2016.08.022 · DOI
- 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00439 · DOI
- 10.7554/eLife.19891 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.bpj.2010.04.068 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.bpj.2017.01.028 · DOI
- 10.1021/bi301332v · DOI
- 10.1038/s42003-019-0583-3 · DOI
- 10.1039/b920629a · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.088101 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0006-3495(90)82444-9 · DOI
- 10.1051/jphys:01986004703050700 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevE.103.042413 · DOI
- 1973, Zeitschrift fur Naturforsch. - Sect. C J. Biosci, 28, 693, 10.1515/znc-1973-11-1209 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0022-5193(70)80032-7 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0006-3495(97)78067-6 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.bbamem.2021.183709 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.138104 · DOI
- 10.1021/ja302528z · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1021/ja9090353 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.0905466106 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1021/ja207470h · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.1003962107 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-017-01163-6 · DOI
- 10.1038/nchem.2785 · DOI
- 10.1074/jbc.M113.473207 · DOI
- 10.1021/jp101759q · DOI
- 10.1002/jcc.20289 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/jcc.20290 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1021/ct400314y · DOI
- 10.1016/0021-9991(77)90098-5 · DOI
- 10.1002/jcc.540130805 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.82.11.3665 · DOI
- 10.1529/biophysj.105.069435 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.bpj.2014.02.037 · DOI
- 10.1016/0003-2697(86)90574-9 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.bpj.2018.04.048 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.458267 · DOI
- 10.1101/cshperspect.a004747 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.bpj.2013.03.048 · DOI
- 10.1529/biophysj.104.049692 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.8211140 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.2004807117 · DOI
- J. F. Nagle , E. A. Evans , P. Bassereau , T. Baumgart , S. Tristram-Nagle , and R. Dimova , “A needless but interesting controversy,” (2021). · DOI
- R. Ashkar , M. Doktorova , F. A. Heberle , H. L. Scott , F. N. Barrera , J. Katsaras , G. Khelashvili , and M. F. Brown , “Reply to Nagle et al.: The universal stiffening effects of cholesterol on lipid membranes,” (2021). · DOI
- 1993, Epl, 23, 71, 10.1209/0295-5075/23/1/012 · DOI
- 10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.078102 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.4977705 · DOI
- 10.1038/nature10545 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1042/BCJ20180022 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3389/fcell.2020.595849 · DOI
- 10.1021/bi00419a039 · DOI
- 10.1042/BJ20091283 · DOI
- 2020, J. Phys. Chem. B, 124, 1183, 10.1021/acs.jpcb.9b10951 · DOI
- 2021, ACS Nano, 15, 12880, 10.1021/acsnano.0c08614 · DOI
- 2020, Biophys. J, 118, 624, 10.1016/j.bpj.2019.11.3398 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Lessen, H. J., Sapp, K. C., Beaven, A. H., Ashkar, R., & Sodt, A. J.
- Affiliations
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- Virginia Tech (US)
- Corresponding author
- Sodt, Alexander J.
- Venue
- Biophysical Journal
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2022-02-18
- Volume
- 121
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 3188-3199
- ISSN
- 0006-3495 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC9463698
- OpenAlex
- W4289732201
- Cited by
- 47
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 15 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 3
- FWCI
- 2.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Biophysical Journal (publishedVersion)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Science Foundation (2137154)
- National Institutes of Health
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (1Fi2GM137844-01)
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biochemistry › Lipid metabolism and biosynthesis
- Keywords
- spontaneous curvature, membrane undulation, lipid composition
- MeSH terms
- Hydrogen Bonding, Lipid Bilayers, Molecular Conformation, Molecular Dynamics Simulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review