PreprintCited by 47Lipid Membrane Structure and BehaviorProtein Structure and DynamicsLipid metabolism and biosynthesis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Molecular mechanisms of spontaneous curvature and softening in complex lipid bilayer mixtures

Open access

Preprint — published as 10.1016/j.bpj.2022.07.036 · Paper page

Abstract

Membrane reshaping is an essential biological process. The chemical composition of lipid membranes determines their mechanical properties, and thus the energetics of their shape. Hundreds of distinct lipid species make up native bilayers, and this diversity complicates efforts to uncover what compositional factors drive membrane stability in cells. Simplifying assumptions, therefore, are used to generate quantitative predictions of bilayer dynamics based on lipid composition. One assumption commonly used is that “per lipid” mechanical properties are both additive and constant — that they are an intrinsic property of lipids independent of the surrounding composition. Related to this, is the assumption that lipid bulkiness, or “shape” determines its curvature preference, independently of context. In this study, all-atom molecular dynamics simulations on three separate multi-lipid systems were used to explicitly test these assumptions, applying methodology recently developed to isolate properties of single lipids or nanometer-scale patches of lipids. The curvature preference of populations of lipid conformations were inferred from their redistribution on a dynamically fluctuating bilayer. Representative populations were extracted by both structural similarity and semi-automated hidden Markov model analysis. The curvature preferences of lipid dimers were then determined and compared to an additive model that combines the monomer curvature preference of both the individual lipids. In all three systems, we identified conformational subpopulations of lipid dimers that showed non-additive curvature preference, in each case mediated by a special chemical interaction (e.g., hydrogen bonding). Our study highlights the importance of specific chemical interactions between lipids in multicomponent bilayers and the impact of interactions on bilayer stiffness. We identify two mechanisms of bilayer softening: Diffusional softening , which is driven by the dynamic coupling between lipid distributions and membrane undulations, and conformational softening , which is driven by the inter-conversion between distinct dimeric conformations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2022.02.17.480963

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 64

  1. 10.1038/nrm.2017.138 · DOI
  2. 10.1038/nri3859 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1097/MOL.0b013e328082e4d5 · DOI
  4. K. Mandal , “Review of PIP2 in cellular signaling, functions and diseases,” (2020). · DOI
  5. 10.1038/nrm2330 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1016/j.abb.2021.108921 · DOI
  7. 10.1016/j.plipres.2013.12.001 · DOI
  8. 2017, Biochim. Biophys. Acta - Mol. Cell Biol. Lipids, 1862, 1155
  9. 10.1038/s41589-020-0529-6 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/j.jmb.2016.08.022 · DOI
  11. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00439 · DOI
  12. 10.7554/eLife.19891 · DOI
  13. 10.1016/j.bpj.2010.04.068 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/j.bpj.2017.01.028 · DOI
  15. 10.1021/bi301332v · DOI
  16. 10.1038/s42003-019-0583-3 · DOI
  17. 10.1039/b920629a · DOI
  18. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.088101 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/S0006-3495(90)82444-9 · DOI
  20. 10.1051/jphys:01986004703050700 · DOI
  21. 10.1103/PhysRevE.103.042413 · DOI
  22. 1973, Zeitschrift fur Naturforsch. - Sect. C J. Biosci, 28, 693, 10.1515/znc-1973-11-1209 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/S0022-5193(70)80032-7 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/S0006-3495(97)78067-6 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/j.bbamem.2021.183709 · DOI
  26. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.138104 · DOI
  27. 10.1021/ja302528z · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1021/ja9090353 · DOI
  29. 10.1073/pnas.0905466106 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1021/ja207470h · DOI
  31. 10.1073/pnas.1003962107 · DOI
  32. 10.1038/s41467-017-01163-6 · DOI
  33. 10.1038/nchem.2785 · DOI
  34. 10.1074/jbc.M113.473207 · DOI
  35. 10.1021/jp101759q · DOI
  36. 10.1002/jcc.20289 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1002/jcc.20290 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1021/ct400314y · DOI
  39. 10.1016/0021-9991(77)90098-5 · DOI
  40. 10.1002/jcc.540130805 · DOI
  41. 10.1073/pnas.82.11.3665 · DOI
  42. 10.1529/biophysj.105.069435 · DOI
  43. 10.1016/j.bpj.2014.02.037 · DOI
  44. 10.1016/0003-2697(86)90574-9 · DOI
  45. 10.1016/j.bpj.2018.04.048 · DOI
  46. 10.1063/1.458267 · DOI
  47. 10.1101/cshperspect.a004747 · DOI
  48. 10.1016/j.bpj.2013.03.048 · DOI
  49. 10.1529/biophysj.104.049692 · DOI
  50. 10.1126/science.8211140 · DOI
  51. 10.1073/pnas.2004807117 · DOI
  52. J. F. Nagle , E. A. Evans , P. Bassereau , T. Baumgart , S. Tristram-Nagle , and R. Dimova , “A needless but interesting controversy,” (2021). · DOI
  53. R. Ashkar , M. Doktorova , F. A. Heberle , H. L. Scott , F. N. Barrera , J. Katsaras , G. Khelashvili , and M. F. Brown , “Reply to Nagle et al.: The universal stiffening effects of cholesterol on lipid membranes,” (2021). · DOI
  54. 1993, Epl, 23, 71, 10.1209/0295-5075/23/1/012 · DOI
  55. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.078102 · DOI
  56. 10.1063/1.4977705 · DOI
  57. 10.1038/nature10545 · DOI · Paper page
  58. 10.1042/BCJ20180022 · DOI · Paper page
  59. 10.3389/fcell.2020.595849 · DOI
  60. 10.1021/bi00419a039 · DOI
  61. 10.1042/BJ20091283 · DOI
  62. 2020, J. Phys. Chem. B, 124, 1183, 10.1021/acs.jpcb.9b10951 · DOI
  63. 2021, ACS Nano, 15, 12880, 10.1021/acsnano.0c08614 · DOI
  64. 2020, Biophys. J, 118, 624, 10.1016/j.bpj.2019.11.3398 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Lessen, H. J., Sapp, K. C., Beaven, A. H., Ashkar, R., & Sodt, A. J.
Affiliations
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • Virginia Tech (US)
Corresponding author
Sodt, Alexander J.
Venue
Biophysical Journal
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2022-02-18
Volume
121
Issue
17
Pages
3188-3199
ISSN
0006-3495 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4289732201
Cited by
47
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 3
FWCI
2.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biophysical Journal (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (2137154)
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (1Fi2GM137844-01)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biochemistry › Lipid metabolism and biosynthesis
Keywords
spontaneous curvature, membrane undulation, lipid composition
MeSH terms
Hydrogen Bonding, Lipid Bilayers, Molecular Conformation, Molecular Dynamics Simulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review