Cited by 820Protein Structure and DynamicsRNA and protein synthesis mechanismsProtein purification and stability

Constructing the equilibrium ensemble of folding pathways from short off-equilibrium simulations

Open access
Noé, Frank, Schütte, Christof, Vanden-Eijnden, Eric, Reich, Lothar, Weikl, Thomas R.·2009·Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Abstract

Characterizing the equilibrium ensemble of folding pathways, including their relative probability, is one of the major challenges in protein folding theory today. Although this information is in principle accessible via all-atom molecular dynamics simulations, it is difficult to compute in practice because protein folding is a rare event and the affordable simulation length is typically not sufficient to observe an appreciable number of folding events, unless very simplified protein models are used. Here we present an approach that allows for the reconstruction of the full ensemble of folding pathways from simulations that are much shorter than the folding time. This approach can be applied to all-atom protein simulations in explicit solvent. It does not use a predefined reaction coordinate but is based on partitioning the state space into small conformational states and constructing a Markov model between them. A theory is presented that allows for the extraction of the full ensemble of transition pathways from the unfolded to the folded configurations. The approach is applied to the folding of a PinWW domain in explicit solvent where the folding time is two orders of magnitude larger than the length of individual simulations. The results are in good agreement with kinetic experimental data and give detailed insights about the nature of the folding process which is shown to be surprisingly complex and parallel. The analysis reveals the existence of misfolded trap states outside the network of efficient folding intermediates that significantly reduce the folding speed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1073/pnas.0905466106

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The MSM approach has led to the construction of extremely detailed statistical models of folding mechanism and unfolded state dynamics for some small peptides and proteins.

    “By contrast, the MSM approach has led to the construction of extremely detailed statistical models of folding mechanism and unfolded state dynamics for some small peptides and proteins (e.g. [44, 45]).”

    From Markov state models of biomolecular conformational dynamics (2014) · cites this paper as [45]

    The paper’s application to PinWW constructs a detailed Markov model and reports complex, parallel folding pathways and misfolded trap states (Application to the Folding of PinWW; Conclusions, page unavailable). This supports the folding-mechanism part of the claim, but our copy does not separately characterize unfolded-state dynamics. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Noé, F., Schütte, C., Vanden-Eijnden, E., Reich, L., & Weikl, T. R.
Affiliations
  • Freie Universität Berlin (DE)
  • Courant Institute, New York University, 251 Mercer Street, New York, NY 10012; and
  • Max Planck Institute of Colloids and Interfaces (DE)
  • Max Planck Society (DE)
Venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Published
2009-11-10
Volume
106
Issue
45
Pages
19011-19016
ISSN
  • 0027-8424 (ISSN-L)
  • 1091-6490
OpenAlex
W1979070806
Cited by
820
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 65 · 2020: 50 · 2019: 42 · 2018: 55 · 2017: 50 · 2016: 51 · 2015: 49 · 2014: 59 · 2013: 58 · 2012: 51
FWCI
17.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein purification and stability
Keywords
protein folding, folding pathways, equilibrium ensembles, Markov state models, rare events, folding intermediates, folding kinetics
MeSH terms
Computer Simulation, Models, Chemical, Protein Conformation, Proteins, Protein Folding, Computational Biology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review