The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An accessible infrastructure for artificial intelligence using a docker-based Jupyterlab in Galaxy
Open accessPreprint — published as 10.1093/gigascience/giad028 · Paper page
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) programs that train on a large amount of data require powerful compute infrastructure. Jupyterlab notebook provides an excellent framework for developing AI programs but it needs to be hosted on a powerful infrastructure to enable AI programs to train on large data. An open-source, docker-based, and GPU-enabled jupyterlab notebook infrastructure has been developed that runs on the public compute infrastructure of Galaxy Europe for rapid prototyping and developing end-to-end AI projects. Using such a notebook, long-running AI model training programs can be executed remotely. Trained models, represented in a standard open neural network exchange (ONNX) format, and other resulting datasets are created in Galaxy. Other features include GPU support for faster training, git integration for version control, the option of creating and executing pipelines of notebooks, and the availability of multiple dashboards for monitoring compute resources. These features make the jupyterlab notebook highly suitable for creating and managing AI projects. A recent scientific publication that predicts infected regions of COVID-19 CT scan images is reproduced using multiple features of this notebook. In addition, colabfold, a faster implementation of alphafold2, can also be accessed in this notebook to predict the 3D structure of protein sequences. Jupyterlab notebook is accessible in two ways - first as an interactive Galaxy tool and second by running the underlying docker container. In both ways, long-running training can be executed on Galaxy’s compute infrastructure. The scripts to create the docker container are available under MIT license at https://github.com/anuprulez/ml-jupyter-notebook . Contact: kumara@informatik.uni-freiburg.de anup.rulez@gmail.com
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 19
- I. Kumar , S.P. Singh , and Shivam. Chapter 26 - machine learning in bioinformatics. Academic Press, pages 443–456, 2022. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-89775-4.00020-1. · DOI
- 10.1093/nar/gky379 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1524/auto.2011.0951 · DOI
- 10.1097/01.NND.0000320699.47006.a3 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2 · DOI · Paper page
- G. Bradski . The OpenCV Library. Dr. Dobb’s Journal of Software Tools, 2000.
- 10.7717/peerj.453 · DOI
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt199 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41592-022-01488-1 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/978-1-4842-4470-8_7 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41587-019-0336-3 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa176 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cels.2018.05.012 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.cmpbup.2021.100007 · DOI
- N. Saeedizadeh , S. Minaee , R. Kafieh , S. Yazdani , and M. Sonka . Covid tvunet: Segmenting covid-19 chest ct images using connectivity imposed unet. https://github.com/narges-sa/COVID-CT-Segmentation/blob/main/main_TV_Unet_Split1.py. 2021. Accessed 30 June 2022, 2021. · DOI
- 10.1038/nbt.3988 · DOI · Paper page
- 1992, 4-oxalocrotonate tautomerase, an enzyme composed of 62 amino acid residues per monomer, J Biol Chem, 267, 17716, 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)37101-7 · DOI
- M. Mirdita , K. Schütze , Y. Moriwaki , and et al. ColabFold: making protein folding accessible to all. https://github.com/sokrypton/ColabFold/blob/main/AlphaFold2.ipynb. 2022. Accessed 30 June 2022, 2022. · DOI · Paper page
Metadata
- Authors
- Kumar, A., Cuccuru, G., Grüning, B., & Backofen, R.
- Affiliations
- University of Freiburg (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Kumar, Anup
- Venue
- GigaScience
- Publisher
- openRxiv
- Published
- 2022-07-11
- Volume
- 12
- ISSN
- 2047-217X (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC10132306
- OpenAlex
- W4367048100
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 5 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 1.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- GigaScience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- European Commission (101057388)
- Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (CIBSS-EXC 2189, EXC‐2189, 390939984)
- Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (EXC-2189, 031A538A de.NBI, 031A538A, 390939984)
- Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg (031A538A, EXC-2189, 390939984)
- Bundesministerium für Bildung und Frauen (031 A538A)
- German Network for Bioinformatics Infrastructure (031A538A)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Scientific Computing and Data Management
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Distributed and Parallel Computing Systems
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Cloud Computing and Resource Management
- Keywords
- JupyterLab, Docker containers, GPU computing, AI training, ONNX, Galaxy tool, ColabFold, protein structure prediction
- MeSH terms
- COVID-19, Amino Acid Sequence, Artificial Intelligence, Humans, Software, Neural Networks, Computer
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review