PreprintCited by 23Wheat and Barley Genetics and PathologyPlant Molecular Biology ResearchGenetics and Plant Breeding

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Novel exotic alleles of EARLY FLOWERING 3 determine plant development in barley

Open access

Preprint — published as 10.1093/jxb/erad127 · Paper page

Abstract

EARLY FLOWERING 3 ( ELF3 ) is an important regulator of various physiological and developmental processes and hence may serve to improve plant adaptation which will be substantial for future plant breeding. To expand the limited knowledge on barley ELF3 in determining agronomic traits, we conducted field studies with heterogeneous inbred families (HIFs) derived from selected lines of the wild barley nested association mapping population HEB-25. During two growing seasons, phenotypes of nearly isogenic HIF sister lines, segregating for exotic and cultivated alleles at the ELF3 locus, were compared for ten developmental and yield-related traits. We determine novel exotic ELF3 alleles and show that HIF lines, carrying the exotic ELF3 allele, accelerated plant development compared to the cultivated ELF3 allele, depending on the genetic background. Remarkably, the most extreme phenotypic effects could be attributed to one exotic ELF3 allele, differing in only one SNP from the cultivated Barke ELF3 allele. This SNP causes an amino acid change, which predictively has an impact on the protein structure of ELF3, thereby possibly affecting phase separation behaviour and nano-compartment formation of ELF3 and, potentially, also affecting its local cellular interactions causing significant trait differences between HIF sister lines.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1101/2022.07.15.500212

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 96

  1. 2017, Heading Date Is Not Flowering Time in Spring Barley, Front Plant Sci, 8, 896, 10.3389/fpls.2017.00896 · DOI
  2. 10.1038/nrg3291 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 2020, Photoperiod sensing of the circadian clock is controlled by EARLY FLOWERING 3 and GIGANTEA, Plant Journal, 101, 1397, 10.1111/tpj.14604 · DOI
  4. 2017, Development and Evaluation of a Barley 50k iSelect SNP Array, Frontiers in Plant Science, 8, 1792, 10.3389/fpls.2017.01792 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/j.molp.2015.03.003 · DOI
  6. 10.1038/nrg2896 · DOI
  7. 10.1093/nar/gkaa977 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1016/j.copbio.2014.11.023 · DOI
  9. 10.1105/tpc.114.123794 · DOI
  10. 10.3389/fpls.2021.769194 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/j.cub.2014.10.076 · DOI
  12. 10.1007/s00239-015-9665-0 · DOI
  13. 2021, Genetic and Management Effects on Barley Yield and Phenology in the Mediterranean Basin, Front Plant Sci, 12, 655406, 10.3389/fpls.2021.655406 · DOI
  14. 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04839.x · DOI
  15. 2012, Expression conservation within the circadian clock of a monocot: natural variation at barley Ppd-H1 affects circadian expression of flowering time genes, but not clock orthologs, BMC Plant Biology, 12, 97, 10.1186/1471-2229-12-97 · DOI
  16. 2014, Genetic Control of Reproductive Development in Temperate Cereals, Advances in Botanical Research, 72, 131, 10.1016/B978-0-12-417162-6.00005-5 · DOI
  17. 2021, Candidate genes underlying QTL for flowering time and their interactions in a wide spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) cross, The Crop Journal, 9, 862, 10.1016/j.cj.2020.07.008 · DOI
  18. 2014, A meta-analysis of crop yield under climate change and adaptation, Nature Climate Change, 4, 287, 10.1038/nclimate2153 · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1093/jxb/erm042 · DOI
  20. 10.1101/gr.849004 · DOI
  21. 2015, Direct links between the vernalization response and other key traits of cereal crops, Nature Communications, 6, 5882, 10.1038/ncomms6882 · DOI
  22. 10.1105/tpc.15.00203 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/j.cub.2010.12.013 · DOI
  24. 10.1104/pp.16.01275 · DOI
  25. 10.1093/jexbot/51.342.9 · DOI
  26. 2017, The evening complex coordinates environmental and endogenous signals in Arabidopsis, Nat Plants, 3, 17087, 10.1038/nplants.2017.87 · DOI
  27. 10.1073/pnas.1120496109 · DOI
  28. 2021, Major flowering time genes of barley: allelic diversity, effects, and comparison with wheat, Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 134, 1867, 10.1007/s00122-021-03824-z · DOI
  29. 2011, Determinants of barley grain yield in a wide range of Mediterranean environments, Field Crops Research, 120, 169, 10.1016/j.fcr.2010.09.010 · DOI
  30. 10.1073/pnas.1110682108 · DOI
  31. 2020, Protein Sequence Analysis Using the MPI Bioinformatics Toolkit, Current Protocols in Bioinformatics, 72, e108, 10.1002/cpbi.108 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 2017, PIF4 Coordinates Thermosensory Growth and Immunity in Arabidopsis, Current Biology, 27, 243, 10.1016/j.cub.2016.11.012 · DOI
  33. 10.1093/nar/gkg563 · DOI
  34. 2021, Ppd-H1 integrates drought stress signals to control spike development and flowering time in barley, Journal of Experimental Botany, 72, 122, 10.1093/jxb/eraa261 · DOI
  35. 10.1111/pce.12242 · DOI
  36. 10.1146/annurev.arplant.043008.092054 · DOI
  37. 10.1016/S0168-9525(02)00009-4 · DOI
  38. 10.1104/pp.108.116418 · DOI
  39. 10.1105/tpc.111.093807 · DOI
  40. 2019, Genetic dissection of grain elements predicted by hyperspectral imaging associated with yield-related traits in a wild barley NAM population, Plant Science, 285, 151, 10.1016/j.plantsci.2019.05.008 · DOI
  41. 10.1093/jxb/ery002 · DOI
  42. 10.1105/tpc.13.6.1281 · DOI
  43. 2016, Identification of Evening Complex Associated Proteins in Arabidopsis by Affinity Purification and Mass Spectrometry, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics, 15, 201, 10.1074/mcp.M115.054064 · DOI
  44. 10.1002/pld3.18 · DOI
  45. 10.1016/j.tig.2016.08.002 · DOI
  46. 2020, The barley pan-genome reveals the hidden legacy of mutation breeding, Nature, 588, 284, 10.1038/s41586-020-2947-8 · DOI · Paper page
  47. 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1984.tb07877.x · DOI
  48. 10.1038/s41586-020-2644-7 · DOI
  49. 10.1093/bib/bbx108 · DOI · Paper page
  50. 10.1093/jxb/erv441 · DOI
  51. Kim DH , Han KH . 2018. Transient Secondary Structures as General Target-Binding Motifs in Intrinsically Disordered Proteins. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 19. · DOI
  52. 10.1104/pp.113.233932 · DOI
  53. 10.1016/j.cub.2009.01.046 · DOI
  54. 10.1038/nature10928 · DOI
  55. 10.1093/nar/gkt389 · DOI
  56. 10.1105/tpc.13.6.1293 · DOI
  57. 2019, Liquid-Liquid Phase Separation Is Driven by Large-Scale Conformational Unwinding and Fluctuations of Intrinsically Disordered Protein Molecules, Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters, 10, 3929, 10.1021/acs.jpclett.9b01731 · DOI
  58. 10.1186/s12864-015-1459-7 · DOI
  59. 10.1093/jxb/erw070 · DOI
  60. 10.5447/ipk/2019/20 · DOI
  61. 2017, Estimating parent-specific QTL effects through cumulating linked identity-by-state SNP effects in multiparental populations, Heredity, 118, 477, 10.1038/hdy.2016.121 · DOI
  62. 1997, Growing degree-days: one equation, two interpretations Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 87, 291
  63. 10.1101/gad.331520.119 · DOI
  64. 10.1038/367660a0 · DOI
  65. 10.1186/s13059-019-1899-5 · DOI · Paper page
  66. 10.1104/pp.19.01411 · DOI
  67. 2017, MobiDB-lite: fast and highly specific consensus prediction of intrinsic disorder in proteins, Bioinformatics, 33, 1402, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx015 · DOI
  68. Nevo E . 2013. Evolution of Wild Barley and Barley Improvement. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1–23. · DOI
  69. 10.1016/j.cub.2014.10.070 · DOI
  70. 10.1038/nature10182 · DOI
  71. Pourkheirandish M , Hensel G , Kilian B , et al. 2015. Evolution of the Grain Dispersal System in Barley. Cell, 527–539. · DOI
  72. 2016, Molecular and genetic control of plant thermomorphogenesis, Nature Plants, 2, 15190, 10.1038/nplants.2015.190 · DOI
  73. 2015, Natural variants of ELF3 affect thermomorphogenesis by transcriptionally modulating PIF4-dependent auxin response genes, BMC Plant Biology, 15, 197, 10.1186/s12870-015-0566-6 · DOI
  74. 2016, Yield-related salinity tolerance traits identified in a nested association mapping (NAM) population of wild barley, Scientific Reports, 6, 32586, 10.1038/srep32586 · DOI
  75. Semagn K , Babu R , Hearne S , Olsen M . 2014. Single nucleotide polymorphism genotyping using Kompetitive Allele Specific PCR (KASP): overview of the technology and its application in crop improvement. Molecular Breeding 33. · DOI
  76. 10.1021/bi00184a020 · DOI
  77. 10.1093/nar/gkaa1074 · DOI · Paper page
  78. 10.1126/science.277.5329.1063 · DOI
  79. 10.1073/pnas.0911006107 · DOI
  80. 10.1007/s001220050654 · DOI
  81. 10.1126/science.1117619 · DOI
  82. Vernon RM , Chong PA , Tsang B , Kim TH , Bah A , Farber P , Lin H , Forman-Kay JD . 2018. Pi-Pi contacts are an overlooked protein feature relevant to phase separation. Elife 7. · DOI
  83. 10.1007/s11103-005-0351-2 · DOI
  84. 2019, Barley yield formation under abiotic stress depends on the interplay between flowering time genes and environmental cues, Scientific Reports, 9, 6397, 10.1038/s41598-019-42673-1 · DOI
  85. 10.1146/annurev.genet.40.110405.090603 · DOI
  86. 2017, The alternative splicing of EAM8 contributes to early flowering and short-season adaptation in a landrace barley from the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau, Theor Appl Genet, 130, 757, 10.1007/s00122-016-2848-2 · DOI
  87. 10.1073/pnas.0607142103 · DOI
  88. 10.1126/science.1094305 · DOI
  89. 10.1073/pnas.0937399100 · DOI
  90. 10.1016/j.molcel.2008.09.026 · DOI
  91. 10.1111/j.1365-3180.1974.tb01084.x · DOI
  92. 10.1046/j.1365-313X.1996.10040691.x · DOI
  93. 10.1073/pnas.1113009109 · DOI
  94. 10.1038/35103589 · DOI
  95. 10.1093/jxb/ert209 · DOI
  96. 10.1093/jxb/erab473 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Zahn, T., Zhu, Z., Ritoff, N., Krapf, J., Junker, A., Altmann, T., Schmutzer, T., Tüting, C., Kastritis, P. L., Babben, S., Quint, M., Pillen, K., & Maurer, A.
Affiliations
  • Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg (DE)
  • Leibniz-Institut für Pflanzengenetik und Kulturpflanzenforschung (IPK) (DE)
  • German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (DE)
Corresponding author
Maurer, Andreas
Venue
Journal of Experimental Botany
Publisher
openRxiv
Published
2022-07-16
Volume
74
Issue
12
Pages
3630-3650
ISSN
0022-0957 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4362506139
Cited by
23
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1
FWCI
3.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Experimental Botany (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Informationszentrum Lebenswissenschaften (ZB MED) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Digitalen Hochschulbibliothek Sachsen-Anhalt (Universitäts- und Landesbibliothek Sachsen-Anhalt) (cc-by)
Funders
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (391498659, RTG 2467)
  • Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (03Z22HN23, 03Z22HI2, 03COV04)
  • Leibniz-Gemeinschaft
  • European Regional Development Fund (391498659, RTG 2467, ZS/2016/04/78115)
  • European Social Fund (ZS/2016/08/80644)
  • Leibniz-Institut für Pflanzengenetik und Kulturpflanzenforschung
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Molecular Biology Research
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetics and Plant Breeding
Keywords
EARLY FLOWERING 3, ELF3, barley, wild barley, nested association mapping, plant development, phenology, yield components, single nucleotide polymorphisms, amino acid substitutions, protein phase separation, genetic background effects
MeSH terms
Plant Breeding, Alleles, Hordeum, Chromosome Mapping, Quantitative Trait Loci, Plant Development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review